Sources of information on monkeypox virus infection. A systematic review with meta-analysis DOI Creative Commons
Darwin A. León‐Figueroa, Joshuan J. Barboza, Mario J. Valladares-Garrido

et al.

Research Square (Research Square), Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Sept. 27, 2023

Abstract Background Monkeypox virus (Mpox) infection is a topic of growing interest today because its potential public health impact and concern about possible outbreaks. Reliable up-to-date sources information that provide accurate data on transmission, symptoms, prevention, treatment are essential for understanding effectively addressing this disease. Therefore, the aim present study to determine prevalence Mpox infection. Methods An exhaustive systematic review meta-analysis was carried out using available in PubMed, Scopus, Web Science, Embase, ScienceDirect databases up August 3, 2023. The were analyzed R software version 4.2.3. quality cross-sectional studies formed part assessed Joanna Briggs Institute Meta-Analysis Statistics Assessment Review Instrument (JBI-MAStARI) tool. In addition, subgroup analysis performed based populations. Results Twenty-three articles included with total sample 24040 participants. pooled each was: social networks reached 58% (95% CI: 46-70%; 17227 participants; 21 studies; I 2 = 100%); Internet 61% 44-77%; 14002 5 100%), radio 10% 07-13%; 8917 4 93%), television accounted 24% 09-43%; 14896 8 combination 45% 31-60%; 4207 7 99%); newspapers, it 15% 05-27%; 2841 6 99%), friends relatives 18% 10-28%; 16551 18 World Health Organization (WHO) 17% 07-29%; 1656 3 97%), Centers Disease Control Prevention (CDC) 03-21%; 2378 98%), WHO CDC websites 60% 48-72%; 1828 96%), finally, scientific journals 23% 13-34%; 4. 856 12 99%). Conclusion suggests people access variety gain knowledge infection, strong emphasis online such as Internet. However, important note accuracy from these can vary, underscoring need promote reliable disease ensure health.

Language: Английский

Global prevalence and correlates of mpox vaccine acceptance and uptake: a systematic review and meta-analysis DOI Creative Commons
Sahabi Kabir Sulaiman, Fatimah I. Tsiga-Ahmed, Muhammad Sale Musa

et al.

Communications Medicine, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 4(1)

Published: July 8, 2024

Vaccination has been recommended as one of the most potent ways controlling mpox (formerly, monkeypox) outbreak, particularly among high-risk groups. Here, we evaluated prevalence vaccine acceptance and uptake globally.

Language: Английский

Citations

16
Prevalence of intentions to receive monkeypox vaccine. A systematic review and meta-analysis DOI Creative Commons
Darwin A. León‐Figueroa, Joshuan J. Barboza, Mario J. Valladares-Garrido

et al.

BMC Public Health, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 24(1)

Published: Jan. 2, 2024

Abstract Background Immunization, as a preventive strategy against infectious diseases, has consolidated its position fundamental pillar in the field of public health. Therefore, present study aimed to determine prevalence intention receive monkeypox (Mpox) vaccine. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis available evidence was performed using five databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web Science, Embase, ScienceDirect) with search until July 24, 2023. Data analysis R software version 4.2.3. The quality included cross-sectional studies assessed “JBI-MAStARI”. In addition, subgroup by population continent developed. Results Twenty-nine articles total sample 52 658 participants were included. pooled vaccinate Mpox 61% (95% CI: 53–69%; 52,658 participants; 29 studies; I 2 = 100%). analysis, be vaccinated according continents 64% 53–74%; 13,883 17 99%) Asian countries, 43% 39–47%; 1538 3 53%) African 62% 45–78%; 35,811 6 European 63% 32–89%; 1426 American countries. on Mpox, subjects, it 54% 45–62%; 10,296 11 general population, 57% 33–79%; 3333 10 health care workers, 76% 70–82%; 39,029 8 98%) lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex (LGBTI) community. secondary outcome, refusal vaccination found 22% 16–30%; 45,577 21 99%). Conclusion highlights importance recognizing regional disparities vaccine willingness refusal. It emphasizes employing strategies achieve widespread coverage safeguard worldwide. Terms used Joanna Briggs Institute Meta-Analysis Statistics Assessment Review Instrument (JBI-MAStARI), Prospective International Registry Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), Preferred Reporting Items for Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).

Language: Английский

Citations

10
Sources of information on monkeypox virus infection. A systematic review with meta-analysis DOI Creative Commons
Darwin A. León‐Figueroa, Joshuan J. Barboza, Mario J. Valladares-Garrido

et al.

BMC Public Health, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 24(1)

Published: Jan. 23, 2024

Abstract Background Monkeypox (Mpox) virus infection is a topic of growing interest today because its potential public health impact and concern about possible outbreaks. Reliable up-to-date sources information that provide accurate data on transmission, symptoms, prevention, treatment are essential for understanding effectively addressing this disease. Therefore, the aim present study to determine prevalence Mpox infection. Methods An exhaustive systematic review meta-analysis was carried out using available in PubMed, Scopus, Web Science, Embase, ScienceDirect databases up August 3, 2023. The were analyzed R software version 4.2.3. quality cross-sectional studies formed part assessed Joanna Briggs Institute Meta-Analysis Statistics Assessment Review Instrument (JBI-MAStARI) tool. In addition, subgroup analysis performed based populations. Results Through electronic searches five databases, total 1833 identified. Twenty-four articles included, with sample 35,959 participants from 34 countries. pooled each included was: social networks reached 59% (95% CI: 50–68%; 29,146 participants; 22 studies; I 2 = 100%; p < 0.01); Internet 61% 44–77%; 14,002 5 0.01), radio 10% 07–13%; 8917 4 93%; television accounted 24% 09–43%; 14,896 8 combination 45% 31–60%; 4207 7 99%; newspapers, it 15% 05–27%; 2841 6 friends relatives 19% 12–28%; 28,470 19 World Health Organization (WHO) 17% 07–29%; 1656 3 97%; Centers Disease Control Prevention (CDC) 03–21%; 2378 98%; WHO CDC websites 60% 48–72%; 1828 96%; finally, scientific journals 16–33%; 16,775 13 0.01). Conclusion suggests people access variety gain knowledge infection, strong emphasis online such as Internet. However, important note accuracy these can vary, underscoring need promote reliable disease ensure health.

Language: Английский

Citations

8
Assessment of the knowledge, attitude, and perception of the world's population towards monkeypox and its vaccines: A systematic review and descriptive analysis of cross-sectional studies DOI Creative Commons
Mohammad Tanashat, Obieda Altobaishat,

Abdulrahman Sharaf

et al.

Vaccine X, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 20, P. 100527 - 100527

Published: Aug. 3, 2024

Prevention and treatment of the monkeypox virus (Mpox) remain challenging in areas where it is endemic. This systematic review meta-analysis aimed to collect this information from various studies one study give a comprehensive view people's opinions, fears, behaviors about virus.

Language: Английский

Citations

5
Knowledge, Attitude and Associated Factors of Monkeypox Infection Among Healthcare Workers in Injibara General Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia DOI Creative Commons
Zewdu Bishaw Aynalem, Melsew Dagne Abate, Fentahun Meseret

et al.

Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: Volume 17, P. 1159 - 1173

Published: March 1, 2024

Fighting health threats, especially the rise of new infectious diseases, is one main responsibilities healthcare workers. However, their knowledge and attitudes toward monkeypox have not yet been assessed. Therefore, this study aimed to assess knowledge, attitude, factors associated with infection among workers at Injibara General Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia.

Language: Английский

Citations

4
Monkeypox awareness and public health challenges in conflict affected syria 2024 DOI Creative Commons

Rawan Al-Deeb,

Azmi Wali,

Noshy S. Mansour

et al.

Scientific Reports, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 15(1)

Published: Feb. 10, 2025

Monkeypox (MPOX) is a zoonotic viral disease that has re-emerged and spread to non-endemic regions, drawing global attention. Understanding the knowledge, attitudes, practices (KAP) of vulnerable populations, particularly in conflict-affected areas, crucial for effective public health responses. This community-based cross-sectional study evaluates KAP general Syrian population regarding MPOX, focusing on areas affected by conflict. The was conducted between October 25 November 22, 2024, using culturally adapted validated structured online paper-based questionnaire. A total 2,035 responses were collected. sample included predominantly female participants (63.8%), aged 21–30 years (41.9%), mostly married (73.4%), urban residents (72.4%). Statistical analysis confidence intervals (95%) significance levels (p < 0.05). revealed while 80.3% understood causative factors, 81.2% transmission, 89% prevention, 78.2% symptoms, significant knowledge gaps identified vaccination (13.4%) diagnostic tests (42.7%), with 58.9% respondents demonstrating poor overall knowledge. Negative attitudes reported 65.8% participants, although exhibited slightly more positive attitudes. Good observed 73.6% respondents, common behaviors including isolation frequent handwashing (58.8%). However, did not significantly differ across genders or marital status. Higher scores associated males (OR = 1.721, 95% CI= [1.42–2.07]), higher education 1.324, [1.07–1.62]), incomes 2.550, [1.56–4.15]). context likely exacerbated negative underscoring urgent need tailored educational campaigns initiatives. These efforts are critical improving MPOX preparedness populations.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Global prevalence and determinants associated with the acceptance of monkeypox vaccination DOI

Dewi Indiastari,

Jonny Karunia Fajar, Fredo Tamara

et al.

Narra J, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 4(2), P. e866 - e866

Published: July 17, 2024

Assessing the acceptance of monkeypox vaccine is crucial for success vaccination programs, yet prevalence reports remain inconclusive. The aim this study was to determine global and identify its associated factors. A meta-analysis conducted with a comprehensive search strategy on following databases, including Scopus, Embase, PubMed, articles published up April 5, 2024. This utilizes single-arm calculate pooled acceptance.

Language: Английский

Citations

3
Prevalence of intentions to receive monkeypox vaccine. A systematic review and meta- analysis DOI Creative Commons
Darwin A. León‐Figueroa, Joshuan J. Barboza, Mario J. Valladares-Garrido

et al.

Research Square (Research Square), Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Oct. 9, 2023

Abstract Background Immunization, as a preventive strategy against infectious diseases, has consolidated its position fundamental pillar in the field of public health. Therefore, present study aimed to determine prevalence intention receive monkeypox vaccine (Mpox). Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis available evidence was performed using five databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web Science, Embase, ScienceDirect) with search until July 24, 2023. Data analysis R software version 4.2.3. The quality included cross-sectional studies assessed "JBI-MAStARI". In addition, subgroup by population continent developed. Results Twenty-nine articles total sample 52 658 participants were included. pooled vaccinate Mpox 61% (95% CI: 53–69%; 52658 participants; 29 studies; I 2 = 100%). on be vaccinated according continents 64% 53–74%; 13883 17 99%) Asian countries, 43% 39–47%; 1538 3 53%) African 62% 45–78%; 35811 6 European 63% 32–89%; 1426 American countries. Mpox, subjects it 54% 45–62%; 10296 11 general population, 57% 33–79%; 3333 10 health care workers, 76% 70–82%;39029 8 98%) LGBTI community. secondary outcome, refusal vaccination found 22% 16–30%; 45577 21 99%). Conclusion highlights importance recognizing regional disparities willingness refusal. It emphasizes employing strategies achieve widespread coverage safeguard worldwide. Terms used Joanna Briggs Institute Meta-Analysis Statistics Assessment Review Instrument (JBI-MAStARI), Prospective International Registry Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), Preferred Reporting Items for Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)

Language: Английский

Citations

4
Knowledge and attitudes of medical and pharmacy university students regarding monkeypox: a multicenter, cross-sectional study in Vietnam DOI Creative Commons

Dung Anh Doan,

Thuy Thi Xuan Nguyen,

Giang Ba Le

et al.

BMC Medical Education, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 24(1)

Published: July 29, 2024

Abstract Background In May 2022, monkeypox (mpox) suddenly reappeared and rapidly spread worldwide. This global outbreak was a public health emergency of international concern. study investigated Vietnamese medical pharmacy university students’ knowledge attitudes towards mpox. Methods online cross-section survey administered among students in four universities using convenience sampling method. A semi-structured questionnaire shared via Google Forms link (quick-response code) amphitheaters at recess. Frequency (percentage) mean (standard division) were used for descriptive statistics. Univariate multivariate linear regression analyses conducted to identify factors associated with mpox attitudes. p -value < 0.001 considered statistical significance. Results total 1,848 participated this (including 1,030 818 students). Their common sources seeking mpox/health information included the Internet (89.7%) mass media (64.2%). Students’ average attitude scores 11.542 ± 3.910 (range: 0–23) 30.301 3.738 9–45), respectively. The score (12.139 3.545) significantly higher than that (11.067 4.118) ( 0.001). former (30.454 3.787) comparatively latter (30.181 3.696), but difference insignificant = 0.111). Factors and/or their sex, age, year study, residence, major, grade point average, type university, past, reliable seek positive correlation existed between Conclusions about relatively poor, while positive. Universities relevant authorities should focus on above use multiple platforms channels communication guarantee trustworthy can reach as many possible.

Language: Английский

Citations

1
Sources of information on monkeypox virus infection. A systematic review with meta-analysis DOI Creative Commons
Darwin A. León‐Figueroa, Joshuan J. Barboza, Mario J. Valladares-Garrido

et al.

Research Square (Research Square), Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Sept. 27, 2023

Abstract Background Monkeypox virus (Mpox) infection is a topic of growing interest today because its potential public health impact and concern about possible outbreaks. Reliable up-to-date sources information that provide accurate data on transmission, symptoms, prevention, treatment are essential for understanding effectively addressing this disease. Therefore, the aim present study to determine prevalence Mpox infection. Methods An exhaustive systematic review meta-analysis was carried out using available in PubMed, Scopus, Web Science, Embase, ScienceDirect databases up August 3, 2023. The were analyzed R software version 4.2.3. quality cross-sectional studies formed part assessed Joanna Briggs Institute Meta-Analysis Statistics Assessment Review Instrument (JBI-MAStARI) tool. In addition, subgroup analysis performed based populations. Results Twenty-three articles included with total sample 24040 participants. pooled each was: social networks reached 58% (95% CI: 46-70%; 17227 participants; 21 studies; I 2 = 100%); Internet 61% 44-77%; 14002 5 100%), radio 10% 07-13%; 8917 4 93%), television accounted 24% 09-43%; 14896 8 combination 45% 31-60%; 4207 7 99%); newspapers, it 15% 05-27%; 2841 6 99%), friends relatives 18% 10-28%; 16551 18 World Health Organization (WHO) 17% 07-29%; 1656 3 97%), Centers Disease Control Prevention (CDC) 03-21%; 2378 98%), WHO CDC websites 60% 48-72%; 1828 96%), finally, scientific journals 23% 13-34%; 4. 856 12 99%). Conclusion suggests people access variety gain knowledge infection, strong emphasis online such as Internet. However, important note accuracy from these can vary, underscoring need promote reliable disease ensure health.

Language: Английский

Citations

0