Commentary on Isager et al. (2021) Reflections on the Replication Value (RV) and a Proposal for Revision DOI
Bert N. Bakker,

Linda Bomm,

Delaney Peterson

et al.

Published: July 19, 2024

To help researchers determine what studies to replicate, Isager et al. (2021, p.1) introduced the Replication Value (RV), “a proxy for expected utility gain”. In this commentary, we point out that there are scenarios where people can opt replicate with a lower RV compared those higher RV. Methodologically, highlight differences in become very small when comparing different large (e.g., over 500) samples. adjust this, demonstrate modification RV-equation – by log transforming sample size leads discriminates between sizes greater precision.

Language: Английский

Putting the affect into affective polarisation DOI Creative Commons
Bert N. Bakker, Yphtach Lelkes

Cognition & Emotion, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 38(4), P. 418 - 436

Published: May 18, 2024

While many believe that affective polarisation poses a significant threat to democratic stability, the definition and operationalisation of concept varies greatly. This leads conceptual slippage as well imprecise tests causes consequences polarisation. In order clearly identify target its micro-foundations, we must understand degree which political divides are, in fact, affective. this paper, do so. We begin by delineating polarisation, social divide is purportedly distinct from policy-based disagreements. Subsequently, explore influence emotions politics, including how affect conceptualised within framework Where possible, our literature review supplemented with analyses existing datasets support points. The paper concludes proposing series questions emotion researchers could address study

Language: Английский

Citations

5

Are We Replicating Yet? Reproduction and Replication in Communication Research DOI Creative Commons
Johannes Breuer, Mario Haim

Media and Communication, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 12

Published: June 17, 2024

The replication crisis has highlighted the importance of reproducibility and replicability in social behavioral sciences, including communication research. While there have been some discussions studies on replications research, extent this work is significantly lower than psychology. key reasons for limitation are differences between disciplines topics commonly studied methods data used Communication research often investigates dynamic uses (e.g., content analysis) types media data) that not used, or, at least, much less frequently other fields. These specific characteristics must be considered require a more nuanced understanding replicability. This thematic issue includes commentaries presenting different perspectives, as well methodological empirical investigating wide range surveys, experiments, systematic literature reviews, involve or audio data. articles acknowledge diversity unique features present various ways improving its replicability, our thereof.

Language: Английский

Citations

2

Commentary on Isager et al. (2021) Reflections on the Replication Value (RV) and a Proposal for Revision DOI
Bert N. Bakker,

Linda Bomm,

Delaney Peterson

et al.

Published: July 19, 2024

To help researchers determine what studies to replicate, Isager et al. (2021, p.1) introduced the Replication Value (RV), “a proxy for expected utility gain”. In this commentary, we point out that there are scenarios where people can opt replicate with a lower RV compared those higher RV. Methodologically, highlight differences in become very small when comparing different large (e.g., over 500) samples. adjust this, demonstrate modification RV-equation – by log transforming sample size leads discriminates between sizes greater precision.

Language: Английский

Citations

0