Notarial Protection of Digital Rights of Corporate Participants DOI Creative Commons

E. S. Tsvetkova

Actual Problems of Russian Law, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 18(11), P. 154 - 163

Published: Oct. 16, 2023

The paper is devoted to the study of methods for notarial protection digital rights corporate participants. work examines concept and types rights, possible transactions that can be concluded at external level with assets, including cryptocurrencies tokens, assesses legal regulation circulation NFTs. risks concluding smart contracts which organizations are parties, also evaluates their security warranty, prospects attracting a third-party arbitrator in person notary order protect legitimate interests parties. has long established itself as an effective mechanism extrajudicial citizens entities, presence notaries’ own electronic infrastructure multi-level liability insurance system allows us consider form means maintaining balance legality transactions. issue protecting rapidly more attention civil science. implementation on Internet revealed number problems, such impossibility making changes agreement influence vice will entire chain relationships arising blockchain technology. In terms participation transactions, there many questions raised regarding verifying representative properly authorized enter into transaction all procedures approving notifying interested parties have been followed. Since assets classified property, they subject law consequences related this category objects rights.

Language: Английский

Legal Regulation of Inheritance of Non-Fungible Tokens DOI Creative Commons
Eleonora I. Leskina

Theoretical and Applied Law, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 1, P. 37 - 43

Published: April 17, 2024

The development of digital technologies permeates almost all areas public relations. At the same time, certain remain more conservative, and legal regulation also lags behind pace general digitalization. This situation is especially clearly visible in field inheritance assets. subject this article to explore opportunities risks associated with inheriting NFTs. purpose determine algorithms for NFTs context insufficient procedure Russian Federation. work uses methods both empirical (analysis synthesis, induction deduction, systematization) theoretical (methods constructing studying object study justifying knowledge) levels. When transferring a token, unique record transferred, previous owner NFT loses token after it transferred. makes similar material objects necessitates separate rights An inherited, not such as art. main problem that these are intangible. They cannot be physically materialized, stored, example, safe deposit box, or transferred physically. Therefore, if owners do have specific heirs, will even difficult include find out about token. Inheriting an requires name explanation where held. testator’s password must available. There may problems compulsory share inheritance, related access assessment dynamically changing value NFT. Also, valuation influence amount state fee issuing certificate inheritance. practical implementation facilitated by appropriate optimize procedural aspects.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Different Types of Complex Intellectual Property Objects: Court Practice Issues DOI Creative Commons
E. S. Grin

Actual Problems of Russian Law, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 18(9), P. 112 - 118

Published: July 28, 2023

Currently, a large number of creative works are produced with the use computer technologies. These can be complex consisting several heterogeneous objects that combined into one object. Since law does not provide for concept intellectual property object but new appear, author examines created technologies, as well NFTs, and provides an analysis Russian judicial practice aiming to possibly classify such results objects. The paper analyzes types named in Art. 1240 Civil Code Federation refer multimedia products, audiovisual works. In addition, cases developed regarding varieties considered. Examples foreign regulation issues discussed article also given.

Language: Английский

Citations

1
Navigating the Legal Landscape: An Analysis of NFTs Under Armenian Law DOI Creative Commons
Tatevik Davtyan

Bulletin of Yerevan University C Jurisprudence, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 14(1 (38)), P. 34 - 52

Published: Sept. 4, 2023

This article discusses the legal nature and features of non-fungible tokens (NFTs). The legislation Republic Armenia does not regulate relations with irreplaceable marks. presents status NFTs their possible place among objects civil rights defined by Article 132 RA Civil Code. process tokenization its connection right ownership is analyzed. norms intellectual property are analyzed, it concluded that buyer representing an object automatically acquire to object: these can be transferred through smart contracts or traditional instruments. possibility implementing in analyzed absence special regulations for contracts.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Notarial Protection of Digital Rights of Corporate Participants DOI Creative Commons

E. S. Tsvetkova

Actual Problems of Russian Law, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 18(11), P. 154 - 163

Published: Oct. 16, 2023

The paper is devoted to the study of methods for notarial protection digital rights corporate participants. work examines concept and types rights, possible transactions that can be concluded at external level with assets, including cryptocurrencies tokens, assesses legal regulation circulation NFTs. risks concluding smart contracts which organizations are parties, also evaluates their security warranty, prospects attracting a third-party arbitrator in person notary order protect legitimate interests parties. has long established itself as an effective mechanism extrajudicial citizens entities, presence notaries’ own electronic infrastructure multi-level liability insurance system allows us consider form means maintaining balance legality transactions. issue protecting rapidly more attention civil science. implementation on Internet revealed number problems, such impossibility making changes agreement influence vice will entire chain relationships arising blockchain technology. In terms participation transactions, there many questions raised regarding verifying representative properly authorized enter into transaction all procedures approving notifying interested parties have been followed. Since assets classified property, they subject law consequences related this category objects rights.

Language: Английский

Citations

0