INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 74(9)
Published: Sept. 9, 2024
Here, I review the dynamic history of prokaryotic phyla. Following leads set by Darwin, Haeckel and Woese, concept phylum has evolved from a group sharing common phenotypes to organisms ancestry, with modern taxonomy based on phylogenetic classifications drawn macromolecular sequences. Phyla came as surprising latecomers formalities nomenclature in 2021. Since then names have been validly published for 46 phyla, replacing some established neologisms, prompting criticism debate within scientific community. Molecular barcoding enabled analysis microbial ecosystems without cultivation, leading identification candidate divisions (or phyla) diverse environments. The introduction metagenome-assembled genomes marked significant advance identifying classifying uncultured lumper–splitter dichotomy led disagreements, experts cautioning against pressure create profusion new phyla prominent databases adopting conservative stance. Candidatus designation widely used provide provisional status taxa, named under this convention now clearly surpassing those names. Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB) offered stable, standardized normalized taxonomic ranks, which both lumping splitting pre-existing GTDB framework introduced unwieldy alphanumeric placeholder labels, recent publication over 100 user-friendly Latinate unnamed Most remain ‘known unknowns’, limited knowledge their genomic diversity, ecological roles, or Whether still reflect evolutionary partitions across life remains an area active debate. However, practical importance microbiome analyses, particularly clinical research. Despite potential diminishing returns discovery biodiversity, offer extensive research opportunities microbiologists foreseeable future.
Language: Английский