Scenarios of State Development in the XXI Century
Е. О. Гаврилов
No information about this author
Bulletin of Kemerovo State University Series Humanities and Social Sciences,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
2023(1), P. 37 - 45
Published: Jan. 31, 2023
Scientific
forecasting
and
long-term
planning
of
social
development
cannot
ignore
such
a
key
structural
component
modern
society
as
the
state.
This
article
describes
prospects
for
state
in
XXI
century,
main
factors
transformation,
most
common
interpretations
their
consequences.
The
list
includes
globalization,
scientific
technological
progress,
competing
multinational
companies,
various
supranational
structures.
research
revealed
four
scenarios.
(1)
gives
place
to
new
management
systems.
(2)
political
centers
remain
either
executive
units
structures,
or
relatively
independent
macro-formations.
(3)
National
states
degenerate
into
forms
under
influence
factors.
(4)
New
autarkies
neo-autarkies
appear
on
territories
contemporary
states.
Most
forecasters
foretell
those
are
bound
lose
independence
internal
foreign
policy
planetary
scale.
Some
them
see
process
transition
non-state
models
management.
Others
declare
that
will
grow
strength
historical
perspective,
reaching
form
autarky,
stronger
grounds
than
ever
before.
future
this
century
depends
not
relations,
but
transformation
personality,
values,
connections.
an
subject
domestic
its
ability
respond
challenges
civilization.
Language: Английский
THE RIGHT TO BE FORGOTTEN IN THE CONTEXT OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE CONCEPT OF DIGITAL PERSONAL SOVEREIGNTY
Igor Yuryevich Ostapovich,
No information about this author
I. SHAKHNOVSKAYA
No information about this author
Vestnik of Polotsk State University Part D Economic and legal sciences,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
4, P. 100 - 103
Published: Dec. 24, 2024
The
authors
consider
the
concept
of
digital
sovereignty
individual
and
analyzes
scientific
approaches
representatives
political
legal
sciences.
conclusion
is
formulated
that
content
an
individual’s
based
on
right
to
manage
one’s
data
in
area.
A
thesis
proposed
need
expand
such
a
approach
study
progressive
foreign
regulation.
Attention
focused
modern
trends
development
this
category.
regulation
be
forgotten
considered.
have
made
attempt,
taking
into
account
practice
European
Court
Human
Rights,
Constitutional
Russian
Federation,
other
materials,
indicate
main
provisions
for
implementation
forgotten.
Language: Английский
On the legal response to the consequences of personal behavior in virtual space
Law Enforcement Review,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
8(1), P. 24 - 33
Published: March 21, 2024
The
article
deals
with
a
new
phenomenon
for
the
legal
science
response
to
consequences
of
human
behavior
in
virtual
space.
subject
research
is
relations
arising
process
such
response.
aim
study
analyze
personal
space,
including
Russian
Federation.
methodological
basis
are
logical
and
systematic
methods
scientific
knowledge,
as
well
analysis
synthesis
phenomena
Foreign
domestic
experience
space
studied.
peculiarities
from
point
view
person
malicious
actions
connected
leaving
digital
footprint,
analyzed.
Particular
attention
paid
characteristic
possibility
using
its
properties
implement
interest
user,
consideration
through
prism
construction
sovereignty.
It
stated
that
construction,
characterizing
essence
an
individual
should
have
following
meaning
–
"if
there
harmful
associated
use
it
necessary
provide
form
response,
neutralizing
actions,
otherwise
network
functioning
electronic
information
resources
will
be
accompanied
by
socially
dangerous
manifestations".
At
same
time
relevant
considered
law
enforcement
results
conclusions
made
about
Attention
focused
on
Russia
China.
noted
at
national
level
currently
no
universal
model
mechanism
person's
concluded
this
problem
has
multidimensional
nature,
which
largely
determined
awareness
users.
need
potential
techniques
special
legal,
social
psychological
law,
important
factor
development
practice.
shows
unlawful
environment
closely
related
various
types
deviant
Internet,
category
violating
non-legal
norms
(primarily,
morality
ethics)
turns
into
behavior,
violates
requirements
law.
drawn
fact
each
state
goes
own
way,
impact
often
exposed
those
recognized
most
moment.
Such
rule,
situational,
pursuing
several
goals
(political,
economic,
ideological).
Further
involves
develop
system
theoretical
ideas
forms
responsibility
negative
Language: Английский
Discussion on Prospects for E-Justice
Е. О. Гаврилов
No information about this author
Bulletin of Kemerovo State University Series Humanities and Social Sciences,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
8(4), P. 546 - 557
Published: Nov. 14, 2024
Digital
technologies
are
important
in
modern
society.
However,
the
prospects
of
e-justice
still
seem
quite
controversial.
Electronic
justice
has
already
entered
scientific
circulation
and
is
gradually
receiving
legal
formalization.
E-justice
practice
should
be
considered
as
an
international
project
for
global
digital
transformation
politics
law.
Following
this
trend,
Russia
been
introducing
services
legislative
changes.
Currently,
causes
discussions
regarding
certain
aspects
its
implementation
court.
Doubts
expressed
that
will
ensure
accessibility,
not
to
mention
compliance
with
constitutional
human
civil
rights
judicial
proceedings.
Unassisted
participation
artificial
intelligence
at
all
trial
stages,
including
sentencing,
most
controversial
issue,
possibility
making
a
final
decision.
risk
replacing
judge
electronic
one
simulation
justice,
which
might
destroy
traditional
concept
such.
Further
may
affect
very
foundations
Language: Английский
Disconnecting Russia from the SWIFT System: Possible Legal Risks
Daria Alekseevna Sedova
No information about this author
Russian Journal of Legal Studies (Moscow),
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
9(2), P. 81 - 86
Published: July 18, 2022
There
has
been
talk
for
a
long
time
about
the
possible
disconnection
of
Russian
Federation
from
SWIFT
system.
On
one
hand,
it
is
promising
vector
development,
because
allows
to
advance
in
digital
market.
It
opens
opportunities
offer
alternatives
existing
foreign
technologies
and
systems,
introduce
fintech
into
companies
activities.
other
national
system
currently
vulnerable
giants,
among
which,
course,
are
United
States
China.
External
developments
may
harm
systems
near
future,
which
turn
violate
right
sovereignty.
How
relevant
issue
sovereignty
now
can
be
judged
by
how
many
states
trying
limit
influence
external
actors
every
way.
These
include
Austria,
Germany,
some
EU
countries.
Therefore,
ensuring
security
protecting
critical,
will
require
definite
answer
future.
Language: Английский
Legal Mechanisms for the Protection of State Digital Sovereignty: a Comparative Legal Aspect
Russian Journal of Legal Studies (Moscow),
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
9(2), P. 9 - 20
Published: July 18, 2022
The
rapid
development
of
digital
technologies,
which
has
become
a
distinctive
feature
modernity,
determines
the
vectors
evolution
public
relations
and
modifications
their
regulators,
among
both
technology
law
are
critical.
Transport,
economy,
manufacturing,
energy,
agriculture,
education,
healthcare,
finance
just
some
areas
that,
being
keys
for
modern
society
state,
subject
to
transformation.
large-scale
penetration
technologies
into
jus
publicum
environment
is
mainly
owing
effectiveness
tools
available
achieve
goals
set.
Digitalization
tools,
such
as
big
data,
machine
learning,
neural
networks,
artificial
intelligence,
virtual
reality,
Internet
Things,
robotics,
make
it
possible
automation,
that
current
state
market
confidently
predicted
at
particular
moment
receiving,
processing,
analyzing
data.
This
allows
swift
determination
most
effective
behavior
model
maximizes
profits,
especially
in
business
environment.
Digital
thus
becoming
basis
supporting
competitiveness
today,
not
only
community,
but
more
importantly,
state.
However,
problem
digitalization
covered
by
statehood
today
based
on
solutions
algorithms
developed
put
practice
private
companies
involve
construction
service-oriented
relationship
architectures
exclude
independence
(integrity,
completeness)
products
(goods,
services).
Consequently,
risks
losing
supremacy
power
increase
significantly;
hence,
need
find
alternatives.
article
devoted
analysis
legal
mechanisms
protection
(digital)
sovereignty
comparative
aspect.
Language: Английский
“Digital geopolitics” in the regional context: certain challenges and prospects of the European Union on the path towards information sovereignty
Natalia Vladimirovna Kovalevskaia,
No information about this author
Maria Anatolievna Tikhotskaia,
No information about this author
Yan Nikolaevich Shevchenko
No information about this author
et al.
SENTENTIA European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
1, P. 32 - 44
Published: Jan. 1, 2022
The
COVID-19
pandemic
and
coronacrisis
have
clearly
exposed
the
strong
dependence
of
modern
companies
on
approaches
towards
data
management,
stability
information
networks
digitalization,
as
well
significantly
strengthened
assertion
Europeans
in
need
to
achieve
strategic
autonomy
with
regards
development
own
digital
solutions.
article
aims
determine
place
European
Union
international
communication
space
context
global
management
policy.
Research
methodology
leans
principles
multi-paradigm
method
used
for
extrapolating
some
provisions
Robert
Gilpin’s
hegemonic
theory
technological
competition
among
countries
arena
within
framework
regional
approach.
examines
term
“information
sovereignty”
based
law
a
constantly
changing
environment.
research
addresses
such
documents
“New
Industrial
Strategy
Europe”,
“European
Data
Strategy”,
decision
Court
Justice
concerning
Transatlantic
Privacy
Shield
Agreement.
As
an
example
policy,
author
ambitious
GAIA-X
project
intended
create
open
ecosystem
develop
common
requirements
infrastructure.
formulates
recommendations
aimed
at
ensuring
effective
sector,
offers
model
multilateral
participation,
which
would
allow
reaching
sovereignty
values
ideals.
Language: Английский
“Digital Geopolitics” in the Regional Context: Challenges and Prospects of the European Union on its Way towards Information Sovereignty
Natalia Vladimirovna Kovalevskaia,
No information about this author
Maria Anatolievna Tikhotskaia,
No information about this author
Yan Nikolaevich Shevchenko
No information about this author
et al.
Мировая политика,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
4, P. 52 - 65
Published: April 1, 2021
The
COVID-19
pandemic
and
the
coronacrisis
have
clearly
exposed
strong
dependence
of
modern
companies
on
data
governance,
stability
information
networks
digitalisation
significantly
strengthened
Europeans'
belief
in
need
to
achieve
strategic
autonomy
development
their
own
digital
solutions.
article
aims
define
place
European
Union
international
communication
space
context
global
governance
policy.
methodology
is
based
principles
multi-paradigm
method
used
for
extrapolating
some
provisions
Robert
Gilpin’s
hegemonic
theory
technological
competition
among
countries
arena
through
a
regional
approach.
considers
term
“information
sovereignty”
law
within
constantly
changing
environment.
research
addresses
such
documents
as
“A
New
Industrial
Strategy
Europe”,
Data”,
decision
Court
Justice
concerning
transatlantic
Privacy
Shield
agreement.
As
an
example
policy,
it
examines
ambitious
GAIA-X
project
designed
create
open
ecosystem
common
requirements
infrastructure.
formulates
recommendations
order
ensure
effective
sector
proposes
multi-stakeholder
model,
which
would
help
sovereignty
values
ideals.
Language: Английский