JMIR AI,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Dec. 9, 2024
People
with
schizophrenia
often
present
cognitive
impairments
that
may
hinder
their
ability
to
learn
about
condition.
Education
platforms
powered
by
Large
Language
Models
(LLMs)
have
the
potential
improve
accessibility
of
mental
health
information.
However,
black-box
nature
LLMs
raises
ethical
and
safety
concerns
regarding
controllability
over
chatbots.
In
particular,
prompt-engineered
chatbots
drift
from
intended
role
as
conversation
progresses
become
more
prone
hallucinations.
To
develop
evaluate
a
Critical
Analysis
Filter
(CAF)
system
ensures
an
LLM-powered
chatbot
reliably
complies
predefined
its
instructions
scope
while
delivering
validated
For
proof-of-concept,
we
educational
GPT-4
can
dynamically
access
information
manual
written
for
people
caregivers.
CAF,
team
LLM
agents
are
used
critically
analyze
refine
chatbot's
responses
deliver
real-time
feedback
chatbot.
assess
CAF
re-establish
adherence
instructions,
generate
three
conversations
(by
conversing
disabled)
wherein
starts
towards
various
unintended
roles.
We
use
these
checkpoint
initialize
automated
between
adversarial
designed
entice
it
Conversations
were
repeatedly
sampled
enabled
disabled
respectively.
Three
human
raters
independently
rated
each
response
according
criteria
developed
measure
integrity;
specifically,
transparency
(such
admitting
when
statement
lacks
explicit
support
scripted
sources)
tendency
faithfully
convey
in
manual.
total,
36
(3
different
conversations,
3
per
checkpoint,
4
queries
conversation)
compliance
Activating
resulted
score
was
considered
acceptable
(≥2)
67.0%
responses,
compared
only
8.7%
deactivated.
Although
rigorous
testing
realistic
scenarios
is
needed,
our
results
suggest
self-reflection
mechanisms
could
enable
be
effectively
safely
platforms.
This
approach
harnesses
flexibility
constraining
appropriate
accurate
interactions.
Obsessive-Compulsive
Disorder
(OCD)
is
a
mental
health
condition
marked
by
recurrent
intrusive
thoughts
or
sensations
that
compel
individuals
to
perform
repetitive
behaviors
acts.
Obsessions
and
compulsions
significantly
disrupt
daily
life
cause
considerable
distress.
Early
identification
intervention
improve
long-term
outcomes.
This
study
aimed
evaluate
the
ability
of
four
advanced
artificial
intelligence
models
(ChatGPT-3.5,
ChatGPT-4,
Claude,
Bard)
accurately
recognize
OCD
compared
human
professionals
assess
recommended
therapies
stigma
attributions.
was
conducted
during
March
2024
utilizing
12
vi-gnettes.
Each
vignette
depicted
client,
either
young
adult
middle-aged
male
female,
attending
an
initial
therapy
session.
evaluated
ten
times,
resulting
in
480
evaluations.
The
results
were
with
those
sample
514
psychotherapists,
as
reported
Canavan.
Significant
differences
found.
AI
demonstrated
higher
recognition
rates
confidence
levels
than
showed
100%
recognition,
87%
among
psychotherapists.
also
evi-dence-based
interventions
more
frequently,
ChatGPT-3.5
Claude
at
100%,
ChatGPT-4
90%,
Bard
60%,
61.9%
Additionally,
ex-hibited
lower
danger
estimations,
though
both
psychotherapists
high
willingness
treat
described
cases.
findings
suggest
surpass
recognizing
recommending
evidence-based
treatments
while
demonstrating
stigma.
These
highlight
potential
tools
enhance
diagnosis
treatment
clinical
settings.
medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: July 17, 2024
Background
Suicide
risk
assessment
is
a
critical
skill
for
mental
health
professionals
(MHPs),
yet
traditional
training
in
this
area
often
limited.
This
study
examined
the
potential
of
generative
artificial
intelligence
(GenAI)-based
simulator
to
enhance
self-
efficacy
suicide
among
MHPs.
Method
A
quasi-experimental
was
conducted
with
43
MHPs
from
Israel.
Participants
attended
an
online
seminar
and
interacted
GenAI-powered
simulator.
They
completed
pre-
post-intervention
questionnaires
measuring
self-efficacy
willingness
treat
suicidal
patients.
Qualitative
data
on
user
experience
were
collected.
Results
We
found
significant
increase
scores
following
intervention.
Willingness
patients
presenting
increased
slightly
but
did
not
reach
significance.
feedback
indicated
that
participants
engaging
valuable
professional
development.
However,
raised
concerns
about
over-reliance
AI
need
human
supervision
during
training.
Conclusion
preliminary
suggests
GenAI-based
simulators
hold
promise
as
tool
MHPs’
competence
assessment.
further
research
larger
samples
control
groups
needed
confirm
these
findings
address
ethical
considerations
surrounding
use
AI-powered
simulation
tools
have
democratize
access
high-quality
health,
potentially
contributing
global
prevention
efforts.
their
implementation
should
be
carefully
considered
ensure
they
complement
rather
than
replace
expertise.
JMIR AI,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Dec. 9, 2024
People
with
schizophrenia
often
present
cognitive
impairments
that
may
hinder
their
ability
to
learn
about
condition.
Education
platforms
powered
by
Large
Language
Models
(LLMs)
have
the
potential
improve
accessibility
of
mental
health
information.
However,
black-box
nature
LLMs
raises
ethical
and
safety
concerns
regarding
controllability
over
chatbots.
In
particular,
prompt-engineered
chatbots
drift
from
intended
role
as
conversation
progresses
become
more
prone
hallucinations.
To
develop
evaluate
a
Critical
Analysis
Filter
(CAF)
system
ensures
an
LLM-powered
chatbot
reliably
complies
predefined
its
instructions
scope
while
delivering
validated
For
proof-of-concept,
we
educational
GPT-4
can
dynamically
access
information
manual
written
for
people
caregivers.
CAF,
team
LLM
agents
are
used
critically
analyze
refine
chatbot's
responses
deliver
real-time
feedback
chatbot.
assess
CAF
re-establish
adherence
instructions,
generate
three
conversations
(by
conversing
disabled)
wherein
starts
towards
various
unintended
roles.
We
use
these
checkpoint
initialize
automated
between
adversarial
designed
entice
it
Conversations
were
repeatedly
sampled
enabled
disabled
respectively.
Three
human
raters
independently
rated
each
response
according
criteria
developed
measure
integrity;
specifically,
transparency
(such
admitting
when
statement
lacks
explicit
support
scripted
sources)
tendency
faithfully
convey
in
manual.
total,
36
(3
different
conversations,
3
per
checkpoint,
4
queries
conversation)
compliance
Activating
resulted
score
was
considered
acceptable
(≥2)
67.0%
responses,
compared
only
8.7%
deactivated.
Although
rigorous
testing
realistic
scenarios
is
needed,
our
results
suggest
self-reflection
mechanisms
could
enable
be
effectively
safely
platforms.
This
approach
harnesses
flexibility
constraining
appropriate
accurate
interactions.