Current limitations in technology-based cognitive assessment for severe mental illnesses: a focus on feasibility, reliability, and ecological validity
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
19
Published: April 7, 2025
Cognitive
impairments
are
frequently
observed
in
subjects
with
severe
mental
illnesses
(SMI),
leading
to
a
remarkable
impact
their
real-world
functioning.
Well-validated
and
gold
standard
instruments
available
for
the
assessment
of
cognitive
deficits,
but
different
limitations
should
be
considered,
such
as
need
specific
training,
lengthy
administration
times,
practice
effects,
or
reliance
on
subjective
reports.
Recent
advances
digital
technologies,
ecological
momentary
assessments
(EMA),
virtual
reality
(VR),
passive
phenotyping
(DP),
offer
promising
complementary
approaches
capturing
In
current
mini-review,
we
examine
research
gaps
that
limit
application
these
focus
feasibility,
reliability
validity.
EMA
may
capture
functioning
by
increasing
number
evaluations
throughout
day,
its
use
might
hindered
high
participant
burden
missing
data.
Furthermore,
achieve
an
accurate
interpretation
EMA,
studies
account
sampling
moment
selection
biases
presence
several
confounding
factors.
DP
faces
significant
ethical
logistical
challenges,
including
privacy
informed
consent
concerns,
well
challenges
data
interpretation.
VR
could
serve
platform
both
more
ecologically
valid
rehabilitation
interventions,
barriers
include
technological
psychometric
limitations,
underdeveloped
theoretical
frameworks,
considerations.
Addressing
issues
is
crucial
ensuring
novel
technologies
can
effectively
valuable
complements
traditional
neuropsychological
batteries.
Language: Английский
Subtle inefficiencies in everyday tasks indicate early functional difficulties in older adults: Implications for clinical practice and research
The Clinical Neuropsychologist,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 1 - 20
Published: April 30, 2025
Objectives:
This
study
investigated
the
validity
and
reliability
of
subtle
errors
slowing
in
simple
everyday
tasks
(Naturalistic
Action
Test
[NAT])
to
assess
mild
functional
difficulties
older
adults
with
cognitive
impairmen
(MCI).
Method:
Older
(N
=
111,
MAge=
73.45;
SD=
6.53)
classified
as
having
healthy
cognition
(HC)
or
MCI
completed
neuropsychological
testing
two
NAT
(breakfast
lunch)
twice,
separated
by
4-6
wk.
NATs
were
scored
for
subtle,
inefficient
actions
(i.e.,
micro-errors)
average
time
(in
sec)
complete
a
task
step.
Results:
Participants
made
significantly
more
micro-errors
[F
(1,
109)
8.78,
p
.004,
partial
η2
0.07]
had
longer
per
step
13.98,
<
.001,
0.11]
than
participants
HC.
Micro-errors
correlated
tests
episodic
memory
(r
-0.237,
.012)
executive
functioning
-0.201,
.035),
whereas
only
-0.300,
.0001).
Test-retest
was
good
(ICC
.872,
.001)
moderate
.675,
.001).
Conclusions:
Measures
performance
familiar
demonstrated
strong
adequate
construct
concurrent
validity,
well
test-retest-
inter-rater
reliability,
supporting
their
use
quantifying
difficulties.
Future
studies
should
explore
this
scoring
approach
develop
early
markers
disability
dementia
risk.
Language: Английский
Feasibility of a longitudinal combined smartwatch and ecological momentary assessment study in racially diverse older adults without dementia (Preprint)
Published: Dec. 11, 2024
BACKGROUND
Due
to
increasing
rates
of
Alzheimer’s
disease
and
related
dementias
(ADRD),
there
is
a
great
need
for
easily
deployable
tools
quantifying
risk.
Digital
technology
such
as
smartphones
smartwatches
have
ushered
in
new
era
potential
monitoring
ADRD
due
their
unobtrusiveness
allowance
continuous
data
collection,
but
limited
information
regarding
feasibility
digital
collection
among
older
adults.
OBJECTIVE
This
paper
examines
the
four-week
combined
smartwatch
(ecological
momentary
assessment)
EMA
study
racially
diverse
sample
METHODS
Forty-six
adults
(55+)
with
either
mild
cognitive
impairment
(MCI)
or
healthy
cognition
completed
an
informed
consent
comprehension
quiz,
baseline
testing,
brief
training
questionnaires
during
in-person
session.
Then,
participants
were
instructed
wear
Garmin
Vivosmart4
23
hours/day
four-weeks,
sync
two
smartphone
apps
(Garmin,
Labfront),
complete
daily
survey.
Training
time,
adherence
survey,
performance
on
quiz
quantified.
Feasibility
metrics
analyzed
relation
cognition,
self-reported
functional
decline,
demographic
factors.
Self-reported
usability
was
collected
at
end
study.
RESULTS
:
During
study,
wore
waking
sleep
hours
average
20
per
day
93%
response
rate
surveys.
Participants
also
scored
well
(M=97.33%
correct,
SD=6.86)).
Older
required
longer
times
(r=.405,
P=.006)
who
reported
greater
cognitive/functional
decline
(ECog)
had
lower
time
(r=-.387,
P=.009).
Those
MCI
(Median=20.64,
IQR=2.74)
significantly
than
those
(Median=21.45,
IQR=1.29;
U=79.00,
z=-2.048,
P=.041,
r=-.31).
Black
(Median=20.61,
IQR=
3.18)
White
(Median=21.67,
IQR=.97,
U=310.00,
z=3.357,
p<.001).On
survey
all
(100%)
indicated
they
would
participate
future
asking
them
over
80%
agreed
positive
experience
smartwatch.
Over
90%
satisfied
very
syncing
process
both
apps.
CONCLUSIONS
Smartwatch
monitoring,
including
syncing,
highly
feasible
adults,
strong
surveys
high
satisfaction
will
require
more
support
learning
procedures
time.
Overall,
longitudinal
Labfront
application
acceptable
collect
nearly
without
impairment.
Language: Английский
Longitudinal and combined smartwatch and ecological momentary assessment in racially diverse older adults: Feasibility, adherence, and acceptability study (Preprint)
JMIR Human Factors,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Dec. 11, 2024
Due
to
the
rising
prevalence
of
Alzheimer
disease
and
related
dementias,
easily
deployable
tools
quantify
risk
are
needed.
Smartphones
smartwatches
enable
unobtrusive
continuous
monitoring,
but
there
is
limited
information
regarding
feasibility,
adherence,
acceptability
digital
data
collection
among
racially
diverse
older
adults.
This
paper
examined
a
4-week
combined
smartwatch
monitoring
ecological
momentary
assessment
(EMA)
study
in
sample
A
total
44
adults
(aged
≥55
y)
with
either
mild
cognitive
impairment
or
healthy
cognition
completed
an
informed
consent
comprehension
quiz,
baseline
testing,
training
collection,
questionnaires.
Participants
were
instructed
wear
Garmin
Vivosmart
4
for
23
h/d
weeks,
sync
2
smartphone
apps
(Garmin
Labfront)
daily,
complete
daily
EMA
survey
automated
prompts
surveys
charging.
Training
time,
adherence
(eg,
time),
response
rate,
performance
on
quiz
quantified.
Associations
between
feasibility
metrics
participant
factors
evaluated.
Self-reported
usability
was
collected
at
end.
Consent
scores
high
(mean
97.33%,
SD
6.86%
correct),
sessions
lasted
average
17.93
(SD
6.89)
minutes.
During
study,
participants
wore
21
1.53)
showed
rate
94%
9.58%)
surveys.
In
unadjusted
bivariate
analyses,
age,
race,
associated
measures,
only
age
race
remained
significant
multivariate
models.
After
accounting
all
factors,
predictor
longer
Black
lower
time.
On
survey,
(45/45,
100%)
indicated
willingness
participate
future
studies,
>80%
(37/45)
had
positive
experience,
>90%
(41/45)
satisfied
app
syncing.
Smartwatch
requiring
wear,
syncing,
completion,
highly
feasible
because
high,
as
general
satisfaction
Although
may
require
more
procedures
prompting
during
period,
longitudinal
Labfront
acceptable
collecting
nearly
White
adults,
including
those
without.
Language: Английский