Journal of Biogeography, Journal Year: 2002, Volume and Issue: 29(12), P. 1595 - 1618
Published: Dec. 1, 2002
Language: Английский
Journal of Biogeography, Journal Year: 2002, Volume and Issue: 29(12), P. 1595 - 1618
Published: Dec. 1, 2002
Language: Английский
Global Environmental Change, Journal Year: 2006, Volume and Issue: 16(3), P. 253 - 267
Published: July 22, 2006
Language: Английский
Citations
6710Annual Review of Environment and Resources, Journal Year: 2005, Volume and Issue: 30(1), P. 441 - 473
Published: July 25, 2005
▪ Abstract We explore the social dimension that enables adaptive ecosystem-based management. The review concentrates on experiences of governance social-ecological systems during periods abrupt change (crisis) and investigates sources renewal reorganization. Such connects individuals, organizations, agencies, institutions at multiple organizational levels. Key persons provide leadership, trust, vision, meaning, they help transform management organizations toward a learning environment. Adaptive often self-organize as networks with teams actor groups draw various knowledge for development common understanding policies. emergence “bridging organizations” seem to lower costs collaboration conflict resolution, enabling legislation governmental policies can support self-organization while framing creativity comanagement efforts. A resilient system may make use crisis an opportunity into more desired state.
Language: Английский
Citations
5062Ecological Applications, Journal Year: 2000, Volume and Issue: 10(5), P. 1251 - 1262
Published: Oct. 1, 2000
Indigenous groups offer alternative knowledge and perspectives based on their own locally developed practices of resource use. We surveyed the international literature to focus role Traditional Ecological Knowledge in monitoring, responding to, managing ecosystem processes functions, with special attention ecological resilience. Case studies revealed that there exists a diversity local or traditional for management. These include multiple species management, rotation, succession landscape patchiness other ways pulses surprises. Social mechanisms behind these number adaptations generation, accumulation, transmission knowledge; use institutions provide leaders/stewards rules social regulation; cultural internalization practices; development appropriate world views values. Some management systems were characterized by interpret respond feedbacks from environment guide direction had certain similarities adaptive its emphasis feedback learning, treatment uncertainty unpredictability intrinsic all ecosystems.
Language: Английский
Citations
3396Academy of Management Review, Journal Year: 1995, Volume and Issue: 20(4), P. 874 - 907
Published: Oct. 1, 1995
Modern management theory is constricted by a fractured epistemology. which separates humanity from nature and truth morality. Reintegration necessary if organizational science to support ecologically socially sustainable development. This article posits requisites of such development rejects the paradigms conventional technocentrism antithetical ecocentrism on grounds incongruence. A more fruitful integrative paradigm “sustaincentrism” then articulated, implications for are generated as sustainability, extended community, our Academy mattered.
Language: Английский
Citations
1810GeoJournal, Journal Year: 2004, Volume and Issue: 61(4), P. 309 - 324
Published: Dec. 1, 2004
Language: Английский
Citations
1022Academy of Management Review, Journal Year: 1995, Volume and Issue: 20(4), P. 1015 - 1052
Published: Oct. 1, 1995
Our main objective in this article is to join the growing group of green organization theorists by demonstrating usefulness institutional theory as an approach ecologically sustainable organizations. Institutional helps understand how consensus built around meaning sustainability and concepts or practices associated with are developed diffused among We extend offering hypotheses four different areas: (a) incorporation values into organizational sustainability, (b) study institutions distinct elements within systems, (c) spheres, (d) construction paradigms that support sustainability. then offer possible modifications suggested extension a new area study. Among them consideration natural constraints on sense making paradigm construction, regional networks, recognition role individual actors. Finally, we discuss avenues for future research drawing currently conducting.
Language: Английский
Citations
943AMBIO, Journal Year: 2007, Volume and Issue: 36(8), P. 639 - 649
Published: Dec. 1, 2007
Language: Английский
Citations
836Geoforum, Journal Year: 2001, Volume and Issue: 32(3), P. 405 - 414
Published: Aug. 1, 2001
Language: Английский
Citations
754Ecology and Society, Journal Year: 2016, Volume and Issue: 21(4)
Published: Jan. 1, 2016
Resilience thinking in relation to the environment has emerged as a lens of inquiry that serves platform for interdisciplinary dialogue and collaboration. is about cultivating capacity sustain development face expected surprising change diverse pathways potential thresholds between them. The evolution resilience coupled social-ecological systems truly intertwined human-environment planet. persistence, adaptability, transformability complex adaptive focus, clarifying dynamic forward-looking nature concept. emphasizes systems, from individual, community, society whole, are embedded biosphere. biosphere connection an essential observation if sustainability be taken seriously. In continuous advancement there efforts aimed at capturing finding ways people institutions govern dynamics improved human well-being, local, across levels scales, global. Consequently, thinking, issues planet, framed context understanding governing part
Language: Английский
Citations
728Ecological Modelling, Journal Year: 2004, Volume and Issue: 176(3-4), P. 313 - 332
Published: May 30, 2004
Language: Английский
Citations
719