APPROACHES TO GRADUATE ATTRIBUTES AND CONTINUAL IMPROVEMENT PROCESSES IN FACULTIES OF ENGINEERING ACROSS CANADA: A NARRATIVE REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
Anita Parker,
No information about this author
Ellen Watson,
No information about this author
M. Ivey
No information about this author
et al.
Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA),
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Oct. 31, 2019
The
CEAB
accreditation
requirement
of
graduate
attributes
and
continual
improvement
processes
(GACIP)
has
been
a
pervasive
topic
in
the
annual
CEEA
conference
proceedings
since
2010.
are
rich
primary
source
work
being
done
Canadian
tertiary
institutions.
This
narrative
review
literature
consolidates
discusses
relevant
papers
for
2010-2017
manner
that
is
useful
to
leadership
decision-makers
at
accredited
faculties
Engineering
nationwide.
Four
guiding
research
questions
were
asked
this
literature:
(1)
What
general
frameworks
implemented
as
across
Canada
approach
GACIP?;
(2)
specific
activities
methods
one
or
more
GACIP
steps?;
(3)
roles
responsibilities
people
involved?;
(4)
perspectives
taken
response
criteria,
including
concerns,
issues,
benefits?
A
qualitative
content
analysis
was
conducted
on
106
meeting
selection
criteria.
Emergent
topics
used
form
discussion.
Language: Английский
Comparative Study of Engineering Design Project Assessment Rubrics to Address the Washington Accord’s Complexity Attributes
Chia Pao Liew,
No information about this author
Marlia Puteh,
No information about this author
Siti Hawa Hamzah
No information about this author
et al.
Asean Journal of Engineering Education,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
4(1)
Published: April 6, 2021
Over
the
years,
various
reports
confirmed
importance
of
complex
problem-solving
in
workplace.
However,
most
cases,
engineering
educators
often
fail
to
design
assessment
rubrics
that
drive
ability
solve
problems
among
students.
Literature
review
revealed
studies
higher
education
have
been
undertaken
a
wide
range
disciplines
but
not
field
engineering.
Hence
this
study
attempts
present
gaps
four
which
were
designed
assess
projects.
It
applied
comparative
case
analyze
and
synthesize
similarities,
differences
patterns
from
produce
generalizable
knowledge
about
how
why
particular
work
or
against
attributes
problem
solving
activities
defined
by
International
Engineering
Alliance
(2013),
essential
features
proposed
James
Popham
(1997).
The
results
showed
rubric
designers
generally
fulfilled
requirements
designing
rubric.
shortcomings,
however,
it
was
found
all-important
skills
addressed
limited
characteristics
practiced
educators,
absence
rubrics.
understanding
these
shortcomings
is
expected
benefit
enhancing
their
instructional
materials
for
implementing
projects
subsequently
improve
graduates
problems.
Language: Английский
Structure and Management of an Engineering Senior Design Course
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering,
Journal Year:
2016,
Volume and Issue:
138(7)
Published: May 11, 2016
The
design
of
products
and
processes
is
an
important
area
in
engineering.
Students
engineering
schools
learn
fundamental
principles
their
courses
but
often
lack
opportunity
to
apply
these
methods
real-world
problems
until
senior
year.
This
article
describes
elements
that
should
be
incorporated
into
a
capstone
course.
It
includes
description
the
general
used
discussion
why
students
have
difficulty
with
application
revert
trial
error
methods.
structure
properly
designed
course
dissected
its
individual
components
are
evaluated.
Major
include
assessing
resources,
identifying
projects,
establishing
teams,
understanding
requirements,
developing
conceptual
designs,
creating
detailed
building
prototypes,
testing
performance,
final
presentations.
In
addition
design,
team
management
effective
mentoring
critical
success.
suggested
guidelines
tips
for
leadership,
attention
detail,
investment
time,
managing
project
scope.
Furthermore,
importance
business
culture,
displaying
professionalism,
considerations
different
types
projects
discussed.
Through
well-designed
proper
mentoring,
will
skills
gain
basic
knowledge
prepare
them
entry-level
positions
industry.
Language: Английский
Outcome Based Capstone Project Design Assessment: a Case Study on an Electrical Engineering Program
Decha Wilairat,
No information about this author
Ittiphong Leevongwat,
No information about this author
Thamvarit Singhavilai
No information about this author
et al.
Published: Sept. 20, 2023
Design
experience
is
an
important
component
for
all
engineering
curriculum
to
prepare
students
practice.
An
ABET-accredited
required
culminate
"a
major
design
based
on
the
knowledge
and
skills
acquired
in
earlier
course
work
incorporating
appropriate
standards
multiple
realistic
constraints."
A
capstone
project
a
significant
part
of
overall
framework
outcome-based
education
engaging
electrical
process.
This
article
demonstrates
example
assessment
used
Capstone
Project
courses
program
at
Mahidol
University.
The
assessment,
which
was
created
ABET
student
outcomes
educational
objectives,
ensure
that
projects
incorporate
stakeholders'
requirements
other
relevant
aspects,
instill
professional
attributes
as
well
drive
continuous
improvement
according
framework.
Language: Английский
Implementing a Single Holistic Rubric to Address Both Communication and Technical Criteria in a First Year Design-Build-Test-Communicate Class
Stephanie Sheffield,
No information about this author
Robin Fowler,
No information about this author
Laura Alford
No information about this author
et al.
Published: May 10, 2018
Abstract
Rubrics
are
valuable
tools
for
making
learning
goals
and
evaluation
criteria
explicit
students
instructors
in
engineering
communication
courses.
This
presentation
will
focus
on
the
evolution
of
rubrics
used
a
team-based,
project-based
course,
which
work
teams
4
or
5
to
design,
build,
test
underwater
vehicles;
grades
these
DBT
projects
assigned
by
technical
faculty
together,
based
solely
resulting
oral
written
design
reports.
For
past
years,
two
separate
analytic
that
separated
available
points
into
list
concerns
under
headings;
would
evaluate
using
rubric,
grade
rubric.
It
was
straightforward
system,
but
entire
team
troubled
limitations
this
approach
grading:
seemed
use
as
series
discrete
checkboxes
instead
considering
how
different
parts
assignment
contributed
whole;
association
with
specific
categories
rubric
lead
too
intently
number
earned
lost
category,
rather
than
pedagogical
those
were
intended
represent;
at
times,
felt
restricted
rubric’s
lack
flexibility
accommodate
value
approaches
required
choices
made
open-ended
(e.g.
some
designs
much
more
detailed
discussion
stability,
while
others
images
greater
consistent
performance,
fulfill
requirements
effective
rhetorical
decision
needs
their
project
audience);
most
importantly,
didn’t
effectively
represent
way(s)
deliverables
evaluated
non-academic
context,
therefore
writing
response
wasn’t
providing
“authentic,”
real-world
experience
is
one
introductory
course.
year,
worked
together
create
single
holistic
be
all
grading
focused
overall
impression
student
make
supervisor
evaluating
before
passing
it
along
client.
The
new
provides
bins,
each
associated
percentage
from
100%
73.5%,
might
fall,
bin
description
quality/condition
likely
it.
(The
indicates
scores
lower
73.5%
possible,
does
not
provide
descriptions
scores,
apart
statement
such
largely
incomplete.)
In
change,
we
anticipate
several
benefits:
encourage
think
rhetorically
when
documenting
describing
work:
“What
do
need
communicate
OUR
well,
persuade
THIS
audience
its
appropriateness
given
scenario?”
Such
an
transfers
accurately
eventual
professional
lives;
flexible,
allow
us
both
innovative
decisions
our
students,
well
representing
reports;
enable
appropriately
reward
high
quality
overall:
there
aren’t
tenths
things
may
apply
equally
designs,
ways
excellently
support
particular
omitted
(and
difficult
reward).
undertaking
revision
approach,
recognized
potential
downside
moving
evaluates
document:
definition
less
detailed,
risk
losing
existing
transparency
about
assigned,
cause
anxiety
who
frequently--and
understandably--concerned
immediacy
receives
long-term
We
attempted
alleviate
loss
ways:
1)
continuing
practice
feedback
assignments
(without
tying
numbers
gained
lost),
2)
creating
brief,
document
major
explains
what
excellent
reports
include,
allowing
lacking
paper,
explore
instructional
scoring
affects
assignments,
influence
artifacts
has
students’
understanding
communication.
also
report
instructor
experiences
disparate
types,
including
able
combine
whether
documents
easier
harder.
previous
current
attached
appendix
final
paper.
Language: Английский
Effective Coordination of Capstone Design Work Using Milestones
Michel F. Couturier,
No information about this author
Guida Bendrich,
No information about this author
Francis Lang
No information about this author
et al.
Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA),
Journal Year:
2018,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: March 2, 2018
Abstract
–
A
universal
management
framework
has
been
developed
for
coordinating
the
work
of
students
and
mentors
in
capstone
design
course
offered
Chemical
Engineering
program
at
University
New
Brunswick.
The
makes
use
seven
evenly
spaced
milestones
to
pace
through
their
project.
milestone
documents
describe
main
tasks
be
completed
by
apply
any
client-based
They
also
provide
marking
scheme
used
when
evaluating
team
reports
submitted
end
each
milestone.
As
an
added
benefit,
enables
progressive
assembly
a
high-quality
final
report
since
is
tailored
section
report.
expected,
performance
on
generally
better
than
average
grades.
Furthermore,
ensures
deliverables
are
consistent
every
group
regardless
project,
which
results
streamlined
experience
both
instructors.
Student
opinion
surveys
suggest
that
appreciate
frequency
milestones,
allows
continuous
feedback
appropriate
pacing.
Language: Английский
Further Development of Capstone Design Project Courses based on a Case Study
Junkun Ma,
No information about this author
Case Born
No information about this author
Published: May 10, 2018
Abstract
Capstone
design
project
courses
for
engineering
technology
program
are
designed
to
develop
students'
skills
apply
technical
knowledge
solve
complex
problems
with
practical
applications.
Other
than
being
an
evaluation
tool,
these
provide
opportunities
students
demonstrate
and
showcase
their
understanding
of
course
materials,
creativity,
problem
solving
skills.
In
many
cases,
senior
projects
major
focus
primarily
on
the
aspects
involving
analysis,
prototyping,
measurement
test,
improvement.
This
paper
investigates
potentials
further
capstone
so
that
in
other
non-technical
disciplines
such
as
business
can
be
part
projects.
As
a
case
study,
this
discusses
carried
out
by
mechanical
student.
The
focuses
fabrication
utility
trailer
height
adjustable
main
deck
targeting
market
towing
needs
riding
utilities
motorcycle.
Using
fully
self-contained
pneumatic
system
powers
air
bags
functioning
both
actuators
suspension
well
custom
trailing
arms
control
independent
swing
arms,
allows
lowered
ground
level
which
makes
loading/unloading
more
convenient
eliminates
need
loading
ramp.
When
preparing
travel,
will
adjusted
ride
matching
hitch
vehicle.
result,
possible
hazardous
conditions
associated
uneven
sway
loss
traction
due
hard
braking,
strong
wind,
fast
turning
avoided.
Technical
details
including
tools
used
customized
components,
strength
analysis
material
selection,
techniques,
construction
monitoring
briefly
introduced.
Activities
development
focusing
successfully
marketing
profit,
distribution
service
mechanisms,
options
different
markets
discussed
objectives
incorporate
components
into
from
disciplines.
Possibilities
have
all
work
team
conduct
relationships
between
how
cost
could
change
selection
manufacturing
processes,
study
affect
discussed.
ultimate
goal
is
experience
complete
circle
product
opportunity
identification,
concept
design,
specify
specifications,
test
improvement,
distribution,
finance
management,
thus
making
point
views.
Language: Английский
Sustainable Assessment: The Inevitable Future of Engineering Curriculum
Asean Journal of Engineering Education,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
6(1), P. 23 - 32
Published: June 30, 2022
The
programme
outcomes,
also
known
as
graduate
attributes
in
the
International
Engineering
Alliance,
serve
a
benchmark
of
standards
for
engineering
education
to
higher
learning
institutions
Malaysia
and
other
signatory
countries
under
educational
accords.
Various
studies
conducted
around
world
have
revealed
that
evaluating
outcomes
is
perhaps
most
important
criterion
Outcomes-Based
Education
(OBE)
which
focuses
on
improving
graduates'
intellectual
skills
capabilities.
Several
Higher
Learning
Institutions
(HLIs)
struggled
with
assessing
since
Accreditation
Council
(EAC)
introduced
OBE
2005.
Despite
fact
has
been
place
over
decade,
issues
persist.
Unsustainable
effort
meaningless
outcome
assessment
among
academic
staff
are
exacerbated
by
lack
specific
model,
improper
use
tools,
collection
massive
amounts
unnecessary
data.
challenges
experienced
HLIs
elaborated
this
article.
concept
sustainable
development
introduced,
believed
be
capable
alleviating
problems
associated
assessment.
background
adoption
Malaysia,
well
requirements
Washington
Accord,
presented
order
emphasise
inevitable
future
curriculum.
curriculum
advocated
article
aims
produce
graduates
while
reducing
burden
staff.
Language: Английский