Deliberative dialogue for co-design, co-implementation and co-evaluation of health-promoting interventions: a scoping review protocol DOI Creative Commons

Kian Godhwani,

Abimbola K. Saka,

Vinesha Ramasamy

et al.

Research Involvement and Engagement, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 11(1)

Published: Feb. 28, 2025

Abstract Introduction Deliberative dialogue (DD) is a participatory research methodology wherein stakeholders with diverse backgrounds, experiences and interests come together to engage in discussions build consensus for collaborative decision-making. The increasingly used health promotion develop equitable solutions complex problems. A review of PubMed-indexed papers alone showed 9% increase published DD studies 2024 from prior years (2020–2023), most focusing on service co-design. Given the increasing emphasis multistakeholder engagement research, there need understand how has been as methodological tool co-design, modifications, implementation, evaluation, knowledge dissemination interventions. This scoping study aims comprehensively application intervention design provide framework ensure employed rigour. It will offer valuable insights into its systematic use can improve credibility, validity, trustworthiness findings while respecting principles participation co-production. Methods follows Arksey & O’Malley framework. designed map key concepts, types evidence, gaps consisting five stages: identifying questions, selecting relevant studies, screening, data charting, summarizing results. team includes decision-makers, researchers, healthcare providers involved co-implementation co-evaluation health-promoting interventions, two patient partners previous experience Searches be performed across multiple databases such OVID Medline, PsycINFO, PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus databases. Studies undergo abstract full-text screening using Covidence. Covidence an online platform simplify process creating other in-depth literature reviews (including reviews, rapid meta-syntheses), abstract, extraction details, results, references. template co-developed building Guidance Reporting Involvement Patient Public (GRIPP2), which ensures comprehensive reporting public involvement Consolidated Standards Trials (CONSORT) checklist facilitates consistent methodologies. allow us co-design Data by one reviewer verified second consistency. then synthesized various stages Ethics does not require ethics approval it analyzes existing articles. results inform development guidelines support methodologically rigorous regarding co-implementation,

Language: Английский

Deliberative dialogue for co-design, co-implementation and co-evaluation of health-promoting interventions: a scoping review protocol DOI Creative Commons

Kian Godhwani,

Abimbola K. Saka,

Vinesha Ramasamy

et al.

Research Involvement and Engagement, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 11(1)

Published: Feb. 28, 2025

Abstract Introduction Deliberative dialogue (DD) is a participatory research methodology wherein stakeholders with diverse backgrounds, experiences and interests come together to engage in discussions build consensus for collaborative decision-making. The increasingly used health promotion develop equitable solutions complex problems. A review of PubMed-indexed papers alone showed 9% increase published DD studies 2024 from prior years (2020–2023), most focusing on service co-design. Given the increasing emphasis multistakeholder engagement research, there need understand how has been as methodological tool co-design, modifications, implementation, evaluation, knowledge dissemination interventions. This scoping study aims comprehensively application intervention design provide framework ensure employed rigour. It will offer valuable insights into its systematic use can improve credibility, validity, trustworthiness findings while respecting principles participation co-production. Methods follows Arksey & O’Malley framework. designed map key concepts, types evidence, gaps consisting five stages: identifying questions, selecting relevant studies, screening, data charting, summarizing results. team includes decision-makers, researchers, healthcare providers involved co-implementation co-evaluation health-promoting interventions, two patient partners previous experience Searches be performed across multiple databases such OVID Medline, PsycINFO, PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus databases. Studies undergo abstract full-text screening using Covidence. Covidence an online platform simplify process creating other in-depth literature reviews (including reviews, rapid meta-syntheses), abstract, extraction details, results, references. template co-developed building Guidance Reporting Involvement Patient Public (GRIPP2), which ensures comprehensive reporting public involvement Consolidated Standards Trials (CONSORT) checklist facilitates consistent methodologies. allow us co-design Data by one reviewer verified second consistency. then synthesized various stages Ethics does not require ethics approval it analyzes existing articles. results inform development guidelines support methodologically rigorous regarding co-implementation,

Language: Английский

Citations

1