Teaching epistemic integrity to promote reliable scientific communication
Frontiers in Psychology,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
15
Published: April 5, 2024
In
an
age
of
mass
communication,
citizens
need
to
learn
how
detect
and
transmit
reliable
scientific
information.
This
is
exacerbated
by
the
transmission
news
through
social
media,
where
any
individual
has
potential
reach
thousands
other
users.
this
article,
we
argue
that
fighting
uncontrolled
unreliable
information
requires
improved
training
in
broad
epistemic
integrity.
subcategory
research
integrity
relevant
students
all
disciplines,
often
overlooked
courses,
contrast
topics
such
as
fraud,
plagiarism,
collaboration
respect
for
study
subjects.
Teaching
involves
skills
(such
metacognitive
competences,
capacity
use
helpful
heuristics,
basic
statistical
methodological
principles)
values
love
truth,
intellectual
humility,
responsibility).
We
topic
should
be
addressed
secondary
school,
later
constitute
a
fundamental
component
university
curriculum.
Language: Английский
Intellectual Virtue Signaling
American Philosophical Quarterly,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
60(3), P. 311 - 324
Published: July 1, 2023
Abstract
Discussions
of
virtue
signaling
to
date
have
focused
exclusively
on
the
moral
virtues.
This
article
focuses
intellectual
signaling:
status-seeking
advertising
supposed
Intellectual
takes
distinctive
forms.
It
is
also
far
more
likely
be
harmful
than
signaling,
because
it
distracts
attention
from
genuine
expertise
and
gives
contrarian
opinions
an
undue
prominence
in
public
debate.
The
provides
a
heuristic
by
which
identify
possible
instances
signaling.
When
people
with
no
relevant
rapidly
move
offer
their
wide
range
topics
as
soon
these
become
fashionable
or
newsworthy,
especially
when
are
contrarian,
we
should
suspect
them
Language: Английский
The cognitive foundations of ideological orthodoxy
Published: March 10, 2023
Political
and
religious
movements
often
bind
around
shared
mobilizing
narratives.In
their
most
devoted
activists,
this
triggers
moral
motivations
to
affirm
protect
the
narrative
from
being
argumentatively
challenged
(i.e.,
orthodox
mindsets),
with
free
expression
nuance
as
primary
casualties.
The
ideological
narratives
are
threat-based,
denouncing
an
evil
or
villains
encroaching
on
a
sacred
value,
such
national
grandeur,
faith,
class,
racial,
gender
equality.
Their
protection
repressive
reactions
ranging
expressions
of
outrage
public
shaming
social
media
“deplatforming”
controversial
speakers
censorship
imprisonment
dissidents.
Orthodox
mindsets
puzzling
because
disproportionate
righteousness
which
they
try
cherished
narratives.
We
suspect
that
may
derive
three
main
evolved
cognitive
foundations.
First,
over-sensitive
dispositions
detect
threat,
human
outgroups
in
particular.
Second,
mobilize
ingroup
members
for
cooperative
benefits
against
rival
groups
by
emphasizing
goals
relevant
everyone.
Third,
signaling
personal
devotion
causes
one’s
allies
value
accrue
prestige
within
ingroup.
In
line
arguments
about
self-deception,
strategies
mobilization
be
likely
meet
functions
when
displayed
activists
sincerely
committed
movement’s
tenets.
Language: Английский
Political conspiracy theories as tools for mobilization and signaling
Published: Aug. 8, 2022
Political
conspiracist
communities
emerge
and
bind
around
hard-to-falsify
narratives
about
political
opponents
or
elites
convening
to
secretly
exploit
the
public
in
contexts
of
perceived
conflict.
While
appear
descriptive,
we
propose
that
their
content
as
well
cognitive
systems
regulating
endorsement
dissemination
may
have
co-evolved,
at
least
part,
reach
coalitional
goals:
To
drive
allies’
attention
social
threat
increase
commitment
coordination
for
collective
action,
signal
devotion
gain
within-group
status.
Those
evolutionary
functions
be
best
fulfilled
if
individuals
endorse
conspiratorial
narrative
sincerely.
Language: Английский
Speech repression and outrage from orthodox activists as attempts at facilitating mobilization and gaining status among allies
Published: May 23, 2023
Moral
motivations
to
protect
mobilizing,
often
threat-based,
narratives
from
contestation
by
repressing
speech
is
a
recurrent
feature
of
many
political
and
religious
movements.
Although
Pinsof
et
al.
give
them
little
attention,
we
think
that
identifying
the
social
goals
pursued
orthodox
mindsets
are
crucial
additions
Alliance
theory
ideology.
In
particular,
argued
repression
may
emerge
attempts
at
(i)
maintaining
mobilization
followers
for
mutually
beneficial
causes
in
polarized
conflict-ridden
times,
(ii)
signal
devotion
one’s
allies
value
gain
status—the
latter
goal
being
left
out
al.’s
as
currently
formulated.
Language: Английский