Registered Replication Report of the Construct Validity of the Error-Related Negativity (ERN): A Multi-Site Study of Task-Specific ERN Correlations with Internalizing and Externalizing Symptoms DOI Open Access
Peter E. Clayson, Julia B. McDonald, Bohyun Park

et al.

Published: July 21, 2023

Intact cognitive control is critical for goal-directed behavior and widely studied in healthy clinical populations using the error-related negativity (ERN). A common assumption such studies that ERNs recorded during different experimental paradigms reflect same construct or functionally equivalent processes ERN distinct from other error-monitoring event-related potentials (ERPs; error positivity [Pe]), neurophysiological indices of (N2), even unrelated to (visual N1). The present registered report represents a replication-plus-extension study psychometric validity ERPs (Riesel et al., 2013, Biological Psychology) evaluated convergent divergent ERN, Pe, N2, visual N1 three (flanker, Stroop, Go/no-go). Data 182 participants were collected two sites, ERP reliability comparison internalizing externalizing symptoms. Findings supported replication Pe (error minus correct)—these correlated more with themselves across tasks than measured task. Convergent was not replicated, despite high internal consistency. strongly N2 at levels similar higher those support ERPs, although failed provide evidence theoretically-unrelated N1. Present findings underscore importance considering as it provides foundation interpreting comparing studies.

Language: Английский

The psychometric upgrade psychophysiology needs DOI
Peter E. Clayson

Psychophysiology, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 61(3)

Published: Jan. 16, 2024

Abstract Although biological measurements are constrained by the same fundamental psychometric principles as self‐report measurements, these essential often neglected in most fields of neuroscience, including psychophysiology. Potential reasons for this neglect could include a lack understanding appropriate measurement theory or accessible software analysis. Generalizability is flexible and multifaceted that well suited to handling nuances psychophysiological data, such unbalanced number trials intraindividual variability scores event‐related brain potential (ERP) data. The ERP Reliability Analysis Toolbox (ERA Toolbox) was designed psychophysiologists tractable can support routine evaluation psychometrics using generalizability theory. Psychometrics guide task refinement, data‐processing decisions, selection candidate biomarkers clinical trials. present review provides an extensive treatment additional characteristics relevant studies psychophysiology, validity validation, standardization, dimensionality, invariance. focuses on ERPs, discussion applies broadly measures beyond. tools needed rigorously assess reliability validate now readily available. With profound implications research have brain‐behavior relationships identification biomarkers, there simply too much at stake ignore crucial processes evaluating validity.

Language: Английский

Citations

17

Registered replication report of the construct validity of the error‐related negativity (ERN): A multi‐site study of task‐specific ERN correlations with internalizing and externalizing symptoms DOI
Peter E. Clayson, Julia B. McDonald, Bohyun Park

et al.

Psychophysiology, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Dec. 28, 2023

Intact cognitive control is critical for goal-directed behavior and widely studied using the error-related negativity (ERN). A common assumption in such studies that ERNs recorded during different experimental paradigms reflect same construct or functionally equivalent processes ERN distinct from other error-monitoring event-related brain potentials (ERPs; error positivity [Pe]), neurophysiological indices of (N2), even theoretically unrelated (visual N1). The present registered report represents a replication-plus-extension study psychometric validity ERPs evaluated convergent divergent ERN, Pe, N2, visual N1 flanker, Stroop, Go/no-go tasks. Data 182 participants were collected two sites, ERP reliability evaluated. Findings supported replication ΔPe (error minus correct)-these correlated more with themselves across tasks than measured task. Convergent ΔERN was not replicated, despite high internal consistency. strongly N2 at levels similar higher those support ERPs, failed to provide evidence Pe N1. internalizing externalizing symptoms. underscore importance considering as it provides foundation interpreting comparing studies.

Language: Английский

Citations

14

Registered Replication Report of the Construct Validity of the Error-Related Negativity (ERN): A Multi-Site Study of Task-Specific ERN Correlations with Internalizing and Externalizing Symptoms DOI Open Access
Peter E. Clayson, Julia B. McDonald, Bohyun Park

et al.

Published: July 21, 2023

Intact cognitive control is critical for goal-directed behavior and widely studied in healthy clinical populations using the error-related negativity (ERN). A common assumption such studies that ERNs recorded during different experimental paradigms reflect same construct or functionally equivalent processes ERN distinct from other error-monitoring event-related potentials (ERPs; error positivity [Pe]), neurophysiological indices of (N2), even unrelated to (visual N1). The present registered report represents a replication-plus-extension study psychometric validity ERPs (Riesel et al., 2013, Biological Psychology) evaluated convergent divergent ERN, Pe, N2, visual N1 three (flanker, Stroop, Go/no-go). Data 182 participants were collected two sites, ERP reliability comparison internalizing externalizing symptoms. Findings supported replication Pe (error minus correct)—these correlated more with themselves across tasks than measured task. Convergent was not replicated, despite high internal consistency. strongly N2 at levels similar higher those support ERPs, although failed provide evidence theoretically-unrelated N1. Present findings underscore importance considering as it provides foundation interpreting comparing studies.

Language: Английский

Citations

1