Feed additives for methane mitigation: Introduction—Special issue on technical guidelines to develop feed additives to reduce enteric methane DOI Creative Commons
Michael Kreuzer

Journal of Dairy Science, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 108(1), P. 298 - 301

Published: Dec. 24, 2024

Language: Английский

The effect of Rumin8 Investigational Veterinary Product – a bromoform based feed additive – on enteric methane emissions, animal production parameters, and the rumen environment in feedlot cattle DOI Creative Commons

Leanna Kelly,

E. Pressman, John Fredy Ramírez Agudelo

et al.

Translational Animal Science, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 9

Published: Jan. 1, 2025

Abstract The livestock sector plays a crucial role in mitigating global climate change by reducing greenhouse gas emissions, with enteric fermentation as the largest source. Although various approaches have been proposed to decrease methane (CH4) feed additives containing bromoform (CHBr3) shown promise minimal impact on animal production parameters. This study aimed evaluate effects of two Rumin8 Investigational Veterinary Products (IVP) synthetic CHBr3 parameters, and rumen environment. Twenty-four Angus beef steers were randomly assigned one three treatment groups: Control, Oil (8 mL oil IVP/kg DMI), Powder (1.2 g powder DMI). IVP resulted intake 32.2 mg/kg DMI, while provided 2.0 DMI during weeks 1–8. In week 9, new batch increased 17.9 DMI. group exhibited 95.0%, 96.1% reductions CH4 (g/day), yield (g/kg intensity average daily gain), respectively, accompanied 925%, 934%, 858% increases H2 production, yield, intensity, respectively. Neither significantly affected parameters or environment variables. These findings suggest that has potential reduce emissions. warrants further investigation, this is first published vivo assess compound efficacy.

Language: Английский

Citations

1
Feed additives for methane mitigation: Assessment of feed additives as a strategy to mitigate enteric methane from ruminants—Accounting; How to quantify the mitigating potential of using antimethanogenic feed additives DOI Creative Commons
A. del Prado, Ronaldo Vibart, Franco Bilotto

et al.

Journal of Dairy Science, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 108(1), P. 411 - 429

Published: Dec. 24, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

7
Feed additives for methane mitigation: Recommendations for identification and selection of bioactive compounds to develop antimethanogenic feed additives DOI Creative Commons
Z. Durmic, Evert C. Duin, A. Bannink

et al.

Journal of Dairy Science, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 108(1), P. 302 - 321

Published: Dec. 24, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

7
Feed additives for methane mitigation: Modeling the impact of feed additives on enteric methane emission of ruminants—Approaches and recommendations DOI Creative Commons
J. Dijkstra, A. Bannink, Guilhermo Francklin de Souza Congio

et al.

Journal of Dairy Science, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 108(1), P. 356 - 374

Published: Dec. 24, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

6
Feed additives for methane mitigation: Regulatory frameworks and scientific evidence requirements for the authorization of feed additives to mitigate ruminant methane emissions DOI Creative Commons
J.M. Tricárico, F. Javier Giráldez García, A. Bannink

et al.

Journal of Dairy Science, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 108(1), P. 395 - 410

Published: Dec. 24, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

6
Feed additives for methane mitigation: A guideline to uncover the mode of action of antimethanogenic feed additives for ruminants DOI Creative Commons
Alejandro Belanche, A. Bannink, J. Dijkstra

et al.

Journal of Dairy Science, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 108(1), P. 375 - 394

Published: Dec. 24, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

6
The Effects of Supplemental Feeding on Methane Emissions from Yak Grazing in the Warm Season DOI Creative Commons
Wenqi Ma, Muhammad Irfan Malik, A. D. Iwaasa

et al.

Animals, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 15(4), P. 518 - 518

Published: Feb. 12, 2025

The yak industry constitutes a pivotal segment of livestock development across the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau and adjacent pastoral regions. Existing studies have shown that supplemental feeding for grazing yaks significantly improves meat quality growth performance, but its effect on enteric methane (CH4) emission from has never been reported, so present experiment aimed to investigate CH4 emissions in three different periods warm season. Thirty male were randomly assigned two groups, with 15 per group, groups designated as group (GR), traditional methods an initial body weight 94.56 ± 3.9 kg, (GRS) 95.01 4.1 which received 1500 g/d feed 120 days. measured at late regreening period (LRP), greening-grass (GGP), browning (BRP) using SF6 tracer method. results showed GRS increased (p < 0.01) total DMI during season decreased forage intake LRP GGP, resulting reduced yield kg BW gain DMD warm-season 0.01), production energy gross ratio GGP 0.05), similarly decrease BRP 0.01). In conclusion, nutrition alpine grasslands enhances reduces emissions, dietary utilization efficiency.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Methane production and whole animal energy utilization in lactating Jersey dairy cows fed a bromoform-containing feed additive DOI Creative Commons

Sylvia Sherwood,

A.L. Carroll, K.K. Buse

et al.

Journal of Dairy Science, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: April 1, 2025

Methane (CH4) is an anthropogenic greenhouse gas produced by ruminant animals in their conversion of feed to milk or meat. Alga Bio 3.0 (ALB) a proprietary additive containing stabilized, synthetic bromoform which known reduce CH4 emission the rumen cattle. The objective was evaluate effects feeding increasing inclusion algae on DMI, energy and N utilization, total production with headbox-style indirect calorimetry lactating Jersey cows. Twelve mid lactation multiparous cows were utilized quadruplicated 3 × Latin square design consisting periods 28-d each. Treatments randomly assigned so that consumed concentrations (DM basis) ALB: 0% diet DM (0CTRL), 0.46% (0.46LOW) 0.93% (0.93HIGH). Increasing ALB linearly reduced 19.7% L/d 18.4% L/kg DMI (430, 392, 345 ± 22.02 22.8, 20.6, 18.6 1.04 DMI), increased hydrogen (None detected, 15.6, 62.4 22.21 L/d). No differences observed yield, ECM averaging 18.9 0.56 kg, 28.4 0.69 35.1 0.84 respectively. Milk fat percentage decreased (5.22, 5.04, 4.92 0.136%), but no difference yield (average 1.42 0.048 kg/d). DM, neutral detergent fiber organic matter basis (aNDFom), CP, starch, crude digestibility 65.6 0.50%, 43.4 0.99%, 67.1 0.64%, 94.3 0.34%, 73.9 1.88%, concentration metabolizable (ME; 2.49, 2.50, 2.55 0.022 Mcal/kg). efficiency converting digestible (DE) ME (0.88, 0.89, 0.89 0.003 Mcal/Mcal). samples analyzed for presence residues, below limit detection. Results suggest can up 19.6% dairy cows, leading DE ME.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Feed additives for methane mitigation: Introduction—Special issue on technical guidelines to develop feed additives to reduce enteric methane DOI Creative Commons
Michael Kreuzer

Journal of Dairy Science, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 108(1), P. 298 - 301

Published: Dec. 24, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

0