Epistemic Humility vs. Credentialism: The Educational Paradox in Modern Healthcare
Published: March 3, 2025
This
commentary
examines
the
phenomenon
of
credentialism,
i.e.,
overemphasis
on
or
misuse
credentials,
and
its
role
in
decline
epistemic
humility,
particularly
within
anti-vaccine
movements.
Drawing
recent
research
by
Cosgrove
Murphy
(2023)
relevant
case
studies,
this
explores
how
when
combined
with
narcissistic
traits,
can
undermine
critical
thinking
scientific
literacy.
overconfidence
often
leads
individuals
to
assume
that
expertise
one
field
equates
competence
other
domains.
However,
intelligence
education
alone
do
not
ensure
sound
judgment
rational
decision-making.
Personality
traits
such
as
intellectual
arrogance
hyper-confidence
significantly
hinder
effective
application
knowledge.
Research
indicates
higher
are
frequently
more
adept
at
rationalizing
pre-existing
beliefs
constructing
sophisticated
justifications
for
incorrect
conclusions.
When
like
narcissism
excessive
self-assurance,
result
a
paradoxical
effect:
greater
may
lead
worse
outcomes,
become
resistant
correction,
dismissive
contrary
evidence,
prone
overestimating
their
understanding
complex
issues.
dynamic
where
leverage
academic
professional
authority
lend
credibility
pseudoscientific
claims,
fields
outside
area
expertise.
termed
"credentialed
arrogance,"
amplifies
susceptibility
conspiracy
theories,
even
among
those
advanced
education.
study
highlights
interplay
between
personality
thinking,
underscoring
need
educational
systems
prioritize
humility
media
literacy
alongside
traditional
Language: Английский
Erosion of Trust, Polarization, and Changing Public Perceptions of Vaccines
Published: March 21, 2025
Public
perception
of
vaccines
reflects
a
complex
interplay
historic
progress,
evolving
societal
values,
and
persistent
challenges
in
public
health
communication.
While
widespread
immunization
remains
one
modern
medicine’s
crowning
achievements,
attitudes
toward
are
shaped
by
legacy
scientific
advancements,
institutional
trust
dynamics,
cultural
narratives.
Despite
enduring
support
for
childhood
immunizations
as
imperative,
evidenced
broad
consensus
on
school
vaccination
requirements,
shifts
confidence
among
certain
groups
highlight
vulnerabilities
understanding.
Lingering
misconceptions
about
vaccine
safety,
amplified
fragmented
information
ecosystems,
coexist
with
majority
belief
their
life-saving
benefits.
The
tension
between
individual
autonomy
collective
responsibility
continue
to
shape
attitudes,
underscoring
the
delicate
balance
forces
that
challenge
it.
At
its
core,
discourse
reveals
paradox:
even
remain
cornerstone
disease
prevention,
perceived
value
is
increasingly
contested
ways
mirror
broader
debates
expertise,
equity,
accountability.
Language: Английский