Improving the mechanism of protection of a special category of personal data
Право и политика,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
2, P. 65 - 77
Published: Feb. 1, 2025
With
the
constant
growth
of
digitalization
and
use
various
electronic
platforms,
any
data
leaves
behind
traces
information
that
relate
to
both
publicly
available
special
categories
data.
The
article
discusses
problems
protecting
personal
in
context
growing
threats
security.
regulatory
framework
Russian
Federation,
as
well
international
standards
such
General
Data
Protection
Regulation,
are
analyzed
order
identify
deficiencies
protection
highly
sensitive
data,
including
about
health,
biometrics,
political
religious
beliefs.
A
comprehensive
approach
improving
mechanism
for
this
is
proposed,
technical
organizational
measures,
strengthening
legal
regulation,
introduction
encryption
technologies,
anonymization,
biometric
authentication,
a
risk
assessment
system.
describes
ways
enhance
role
Roskomnadzor
ensuring
security,
through
expanding
its
powers
toughening
responsibility
violations.
research
methods
aimed
at
holistic
integrative
understanding
problem,
therefore,
included
an
analysis
acts
existing
mechanisms
study
technological
aspects
used
ensure
potential
weaknesses
their
processing.
scientific
novelty
lies
development
implementation
innovative
approaches
technologies
provide
higher
level
security
confidentiality
specific
related
lives
citizens.
rapid
digital
increase
volume
processed,
becoming
critical
task
prevent
unauthorized
access,
dissemination
information.
One
key
adaptation
norms
modern
challenges,
which
includes
new
user
identification
authentication.
conclusions
developing
recommendations
confidential
information,
contributing
national
legislation
requirements
effectively
countering
field
Language: Английский
The Right of the Consumer to Protect Personal Data and its Implementation
Proceedings of the Southwest State University Series History and Law,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
13(6), P. 78 - 88
Published: Jan. 26, 2024
Relevance.
The
article
discusses
ways
to
protect
the
personal
data
of
consumer
as
their
subject.
It
is
noted
that
risk
violation
rights
this
category
citizens
has
increased
significantly
in
era
digitalization.
Legislative
novelties
proposed
by
scientific
community
concerning
recognition
a
non-property
good
are
analyzed.
Based
on
generalization
judicial
practice,
approaches
assessing
illegality
processing,
distribution
or
use
other
people's
decisions
claims
for
such
actions
violating
provisions
civil
legislation
shown.
purpose
study
supplement
knowledge
about
and
improve
quality
law
enforcement
practice
when
considering
cases
category.
Objectives
:
analyze
Constitutional,
Supreme
Courts
Russian
Federation,
courts
general
jurisdiction
protection
identify
problems
related
implementation
right.
Methodology.
When
writing
work,
methods
analysis
synthesis,
system-analytical,
documentary
formal
legal
were
used.
results
theoretical
applied
nature
aimed
at
finding
optimal
solutions
effective
consumer's
right
protection.
issue
legislative
person's
intangible
raised
order
ensure
proper
restoration
violated
rights.
conclusions
made
article,
well
proposals
made,
continuing
developments
stated
topic,
debatable
allow
uniform
way
resolve
arising
Conclusion
solving
way.
Language: Английский
The Nature of the Right to Personal Data: A Civil Law Perspective
Siberian Law Review,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
21(4), P. 579 - 595
Published: Nov. 20, 2024
In
today’s
context
of
growing
volumes
personal
data
and
the
increasing
number
legally
significant
actions
that
can
be
conducted
with
access
to
such
data,
importance
legal
protection
for
has
become
more
pronounced.
This
paper
aims
examine
nature
right
data.
Based
on
an
analysis
Russian
legislation,
Author
concludes
there
exists
unnamed,
independent
subjective
right,
which
serves
enable
subject
control
define
conditions
processing,
as
well
protect
from
unauthorized
use.
The
study
critically
evaluates
current
scientific
debate
regarding
this
right.
Three
primary
approaches
in
academic
discourse
autonomy
are
identified,
tentatively
categorized
“ignoring”,
“denying”,
“recognizing”
approaches.
notes
lack
a
uniform
approach
naming
suggests
designating
it
“the
inviolability
data”.
is
characterized
independent,
subjective,
non-property,
absolute
civil
further
explores
under
arises
terminates.
Specifically,
originates
at
birth
individual
terminates
when
purpose
processing
ceases,
typically
upon
death
whose
was
processed.
need
succession
justified
allow
heirs
ensure
testator’s
if
its
continues
posthumously.
distinguishing
between
privacy,
argues
these
distinct
rights.
They
interconnected
only
theoretical
frameworks
use
protective
measures
one
other
infringed.
A
trend
judicial
practice
been
where
courts
recognize
existence
Although
not
explicitly
named,
nonetheless
afforded
protection.
Language: Английский