Ethics and integrity in scientific publishing

Revista Brasileira de Saúde Materno Infantil, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 25

Published: Jan. 1, 2025

Language: Английский

---

Ética e integridade nas publicações científicas

Revista Brasileira de Saúde Materno Infantil, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 25

Published: Jan. 1, 2025

---

Behavioral Misconduct as a Basis for Scientific Retractions

Journal of Academic Ethics, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 22(4), P. 689 - 700

Published: March 9, 2024

Language: Английский

---

Inferential statistics for cardiothoracic surgeons: Part 3 - drawing valid conclusions from clinical data

Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 41(2), P. 233 - 247

Published: Dec. 19, 2024

Language: Английский

---

The definition of research misconduct should be stated in the abstract when reporting research on research misconduct

Accountability in Research, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 9

Published: Jan. 24, 2024

Research integrity is the cornerstone for a reliable and trustworthy science. misconduct classically defined as fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism. To be considered such, action must have been committed with intent to mislead deceive. There are many other research misbehaviors such duplication, fake-peer review lack of disclosure conflicts interest, that often included in definition codes, policies, professional documents. The varies among countries institutions, seriousness intentionality action. This variability also present articles on prevalence because it common each author use different definition, creating confusion readers. We argue used study should stated already abstract, particularly not all publications open access, so readers can fully understand what found concerning without needing access full article.

Language: Английский

---

Opening the black box of article retractions: Exploring the causes and consequences of data management errors

Published: June 17, 2024

The retraction of an article is probably the most severe outcome a scientific project. While great emphasis has been placed on articles retracted due to misconduct, studies show many retractions are honest errors. Unfortunately, in cases, notices do not provide sufficient information determine specific types and causes these In our study, we explored research data management errors that led from perspectives authors. We collected responses 97 researchers broad range disciplines using survey design. Our exploratory results suggest just about any type error can lead paper, occur at stage workflow. frequently occurring cause was inattention. extremely stressful experience for majority sample, surveyed introduced changes their workflow as result. Based findings, propose revise workflows whole, instead focusing certain aspects process, with special tasks vulnerable human fallibility.

Language: Английский

---

Opening the black box of article retractions: exploring the causes and consequences of data management errors

Royal Society Open Science, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 11(12)

Published: Dec. 1, 2024

The retraction of an article is probably the most severe outcome a scientific project. While great emphasis has been placed on articles retracted due to misconduct, studies show many retractions are honest errors. Unfortunately, in cases, notices do not provide sufficient information determine specific types and causes these In our study, we explored research data management (RDM) errors that led from authors’ perspectives. We collected responses 97 researchers broad range disciplines using survey design. Our exploratory results suggest just about any type RDM error can lead paper, occur at stage workflow. frequently occurring cause was inattention. extremely stressful experience for majority sample, surveyed introduced changes their workflow as result. Based findings, propose revise workflows whole instead focusing certain aspects process, with particular tasks vulnerable human fallibility.

Language: Английский

---

Scientific misconduct in infectious diseases – European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) survey

Clinical Microbiology and Infection, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 30(11), P. 1474.e1 - 1474.e3

Published: July 26, 2024

Language: Английский

---

Preserving the integrity of academic publication: The risks of supporting non-scientific personal blog posts for article retraction or withdrawal

Current Medicine Research and Practice, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 14(6), P. 278 - 278

Published: Nov. 1, 2024

Language: Английский

---

Plagiarism in the system of academic integrity in medical research (part 1)

Український радіологічний та онкологічний журнал, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 32(4), P. 570 - 588

Published: Dec. 3, 2024

Background. The problem of plagiarism is multifaceted and relevant both for Ukraine the world. Ensuring academic integrity in conducting medical research protecting against spread pseudoscientific results particular importance. Purpose – to characterize current views on such a multidimensional phenomenon as (AP) research. Materials Methods. To reveal essence AP its features medicine, comprehensive study scientific publications was conducted, considering legislation application practices. analytical method used process from international digital resources Scopus, Web Science Core Collection, NCBI PubMed. search period covered 2014–2024. strategy based use keywords «academic plagiarism», «scientific «plagiarism AND medicine», «Self-Citation Academic Publications», with filters «years: 2014–2024» «medicine». However, PubMed, limitations were only by years, it database. Results Discussion. characterized contemporary using medicine an example. concept plagiarism» types revealed, specific examples provided. policies journal publishers regarding described. article retraction or other publication possible conditions implementation characterized. Examples investigations given, USA examples. main reasons occurrence identified. Conclusions. conducted analysis allows concluding that most frequent violation integrity. In contrast general «plagiarism», exclusively concerns texts involves reproducing text work without changes another author citing it, incorrect citation, indicating source. words, concepts, structures proper acknowledgment source personal gain. mechanism correcting information published disclosed, guidelines, recommendations, standards professional organizations. Thus, issue not simple straightforward; many cases, committed authors out ignorance disregard legal regulation principles limits permissible free works. Determining whether contains quite challenging, therefore resolution this entrusted expertsʼ (reviewersʼ) conclusions.

Language: Английский

---