A Final Report on the Real Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Cancer in Akita Prefecture, Japan in 2022
The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
263(2), P. 161 - 168
Published: Jan. 1, 2024
The
long-term
impact
of
the
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
pandemic
on
disruption
gastrointestinal
cancer
diagnoses
remains
unclear.
This
study
investigated
actual
esophagogastric
(EGC)
and
colorectal
(CRC)
up
to
third
year
in
Akita
Prefecture,
Japan,
using
population-based
registry
data.
We
collected
data
annual
number
EGC
CRC
a
database
from
collaborative
Prefecture
hospital-based
registration.
net
cancers
diagnosed
first
three
years
(2020-2022)
were
compared
with
those
before
(2017-2019).
Changes
proportion
stage
initial
treatment
for
after
then
compared.
total
EGCs
was
9.3%
lower
than
before,
probably
due
its
declining
trend.
CRCs
exceeded
that
suggesting
successful
recovery
diagnostic
procedure.
stages
remained
largely
unchanged
onset
pandemic.
Based
pandemic,
caused
by
is
settling
down
without
any
substantial
progression,
even
area
highest
incidence
all
Japan.
Language: Английский
Association between COVID-19 Diagnosis and In-Hospital Mortality of Hospitalized patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Abdallah El-Gawish,
No information about this author
Yasmin El Sayed Mohamed El Beltagy,
No information about this author
Mohamed M. Mostafa
No information about this author
et al.
The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
95(1), P. 1868 - 1875
Published: April 1, 2024
Introduction:The
2019
coronavirus
disease
pandemic
(Covid-19)
is
the
worst
global
health
crisis
right
now.The
clinical
course
of
covid-19
often
accompanied
by
hypercoagulation
state,
which
means
that
COVID-19
patients
could
develop
a
number
cardiac
conditions,
such
as
myocarditis,
stress-induced
cardiomyopathy,
etc.The
possibility
morbidity
well
mortality
increased
among
individuals
with
who
have
ST-elevation
myocardial
infarction
(STEMI)
in
comparison
without
virus
are
same
gender
and
age.Subjects
methods:
We
collected
data
from
records
form
personal
history,
comorbidities
laboratory
studies
including:
complete
blood
picture
(CBC),
coagulation
profile,
D-Dimer,
serum
biochemical
tests
including
biomarkers
ferritin,
rapid
test
or
PCR,
computed
tomography
(CT),
ECG
results
echocardiography
if
found.We
intended
to
find
association
STEMI
outcomes
on
patient
presented
Emergency
Department
at
Suez
Canal
University.Results:
In-hospital
rates
were
34.04%
for
along
compared
4.3%
those
COVID-19.COVID
19
had
leukocytosis
lymphocytopeni.Moreover,
COVID
elevated
d-dimer,
TLC
CRP.Conclusion:
When
not
diagnosed
COVID-19,
significantly
greater
in-hospital
when
they
also
concurrent
out-of-hospital
infection.
Language: Английский
An approach to COVID‑19 and oncology: From impact, staging and management to vaccine outcomes in cancer patients: A systematic review and meta‑analysis
Ruqayyah Ahmed,
No information about this author
Ahad Aldalbahi,
No information about this author
Nora Alhumaidan
No information about this author
et al.
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
29(2)
Published: Dec. 23, 2024
The
COVID‑19
pandemic
has
had
a
global
impact,
with
>771
million
confirmed
cases
and
6
deaths
reported
by
October
2023.
Cancer
patients,
due
to
their
immunosuppressed
status,
face
an
increased
infection
risk
higher
complications.
present
study
aimed
assess
clinical
outcomes
in
COVID‑19‑infected
cancer
focusing
on
mortality
rates
other
aspects,
providing
valuable
insight
for
better
protection
outcomes.
This
systematic
review
was
conducted
searching
the
PubMed,
Cochrane
Embase
databases
from
August
2023
following
PRISMA
guidelines.
Studies
2020
pertaining
impact
of
patients
previously
diagnosed
malignancies
were
considered.
Inclusion
criteria
entailed
pre‑existing
malignancy
diagnosis,
any
aspect
patient's
management.
written
English
exclusively
reviewed.
Post‑COVID‑19
diagnoses,
case
reports,
articles
data‑insufficient
studies
excluded.
Screening
consensus
eligibility
carried
out
team
four
authors,
disputes
resolved
non‑screening
author.
Data
extraction
performed
five‑author
team,
detailing
population
characteristics,
as
well
patient
related
COVID‑19.
Cross‑checking
same
conflicts
third
27
explored
COVID‑19's
oncology,
revealing
diverse
sample
sizes
(1,807,559
177
participants).
spanned
various
types,
including
gastric
adenocarcinoma,
breast,
lung,
gynecologic,
colorectal
non‑melanoma
skin
cancer.
Mortality
among
compared
those
without.
Gastric
adenocarcinoma
exhibited
5.9%
rate.
Thoracic
faced
elevated
gastrectomies
decreased.
A
meta‑analysis
(10
studies,
5,151
patients)
showed
19.1%
rate
contrasting
1%
non‑COVID‑19
(5
54,528
patients).
odds
ratio
vs.
0.1036
(3
3,496
consistently
during
pandemic,
specific
cancers
showing
unique
impacts.
significant
Patients
thoracic
risks,
influencing
surgical
trends.
Meta‑analysis
revealed
overall
counterparts.
Language: Английский