Comparison of cooking emissions mitigation between automated and manually operated air quality interventions in one-bedroom apartments DOI Creative Commons
Jovan Pantelic, Mengjia Tang,

Kunjun Byun

et al.

Research Square (Research Square), Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Dec. 6, 2023

Abstract We implemented a crossover study design exposing 15 participants to two indoor air quality conditions in the Well Living Lab. The first condition, Standard Control Condition, resembled ventilation and supply of typical home USA with manually operated stove hood. second Advanced Control, had an automated: (i) hood, (ii) portable cleaners (PAC), (iii) bathroom exhaust. PM 2.5 sensors were placed kitchen, living room, bedroom, bathroom. Once sensor detected level µg/m 3 or higher, intervention (stove PAC exhaust) that space was activated turned off when corresponding three consecutive readings below 6 . overall apartment reduced PM2.5 concentration by 40% compared Control. In difference between ~ 20%. This can be attributed using hood 66.5% cooking emission events for 323.6 h 88 used automated mode alongside 61.9 33.7 use room respectively.

Language: Английский

Perceived air quality and satisfaction during implementation of an automated indoor air quality monitoring and control system DOI Creative Commons
Young Joo Son, Zachary Pope, Jovan Pantelic

et al.

Building and Environment, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 243, P. 110713 - 110713

Published: Aug. 7, 2023

Cooking and cleaning are among the largest sources of home pollutant emissions. To reduce these emissions, we developed an automated indoor air quality (IAQ) control intervention that operated based on real-time sensor readings particulate matter (PM2.5) evaluated perceptual differences between this a baseline condition. We employed 14-participant crossover study design in one-bedroom apartment module. Participants experienced one two conditions: (1) Advanced Control–automated IAQ interventions including stove hood, portable cleaners, bathroom exhaust powered on/off predefined PM2.5 thresholds measured by environmental sensors; (2) Standard Control–participants controlling (e.g., hood) manually. Each condition lasted weeks. followed standardized cooking protocols filled out surveys assessing psychosocial outcomes. Observations indicated weekly satisfaction, perception, preferences were similar conditions—despite lower concentrations during for Control versus Condition. When pairing complaints with cooking, observed participants made when >∼80 μg/m3 but few <∼60 μg/m3. Lower Condition cleaning, did not appear perceivable due to far overall. Our observations suggest connection concentration participants, thereby providing possible changes.

Language: Английский

Citations

11

Foundations of Health and Resilience: Designing a Purpose-Built Sustainable Future by Breaking Business-as-Usual Practices DOI
Ali Cheshmehzangi, Jian Zuo, Ayyoob Sharifi

et al.

Published: Jan. 1, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Comparison of cooking emissions mitigation between automated and manually operated air quality interventions in one-bedroom apartments DOI Creative Commons
Jovan Pantelic, Mengjia Tang,

Kunjun Byun

et al.

Scientific Reports, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 14(1)

Published: Sept. 4, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Comparison of cooking emissions mitigation between automated and manually operated air quality interventions in one-bedroom apartments DOI Creative Commons
Jovan Pantelic, Mengjia Tang,

Kunjun Byun

et al.

Research Square (Research Square), Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Dec. 6, 2023

Abstract We implemented a crossover study design exposing 15 participants to two indoor air quality conditions in the Well Living Lab. The first condition, Standard Control Condition, resembled ventilation and supply of typical home USA with manually operated stove hood. second Advanced Control, had an automated: (i) hood, (ii) portable cleaners (PAC), (iii) bathroom exhaust. PM 2.5 sensors were placed kitchen, living room, bedroom, bathroom. Once sensor detected level µg/m 3 or higher, intervention (stove PAC exhaust) that space was activated turned off when corresponding three consecutive readings below 6 . overall apartment reduced PM2.5 concentration by 40% compared Control. In difference between ~ 20%. This can be attributed using hood 66.5% cooking emission events for 323.6 h 88 used automated mode alongside 61.9 33.7 use room respectively.

Language: Английский

Citations

0