Sociologisk Forskning,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
60(3-4), P. 299 - 325
Published: Dec. 31, 2023
I
denna
artikel
undersöks
energigemenskaper
som
en
arena
inom
vilken
möjligheterna
till
mer
rättvis
och
demokratiskt
orienterad
klimatomställning
tar
form.
Mer
specifikt
utforskas
hur
i
Sverige
utkristalliseras
mot
bakgrund
av
EU:s
Ren
Energi-paket,
där
dessa
utpekats
ett
viktigt
verktyg
för
utökat
medborgardeltagande
fördjupad
demokratisering.
Med
avstamp
kritisk
samhällsvetenskaplig
miljöforskning
det
svenska
landskapet
diskursivt
slagfält
sociomateriella
arrangemang
aktörsintressen
formeras.
Särskild
uppmärksamhet
ägnas
åt
aktörers
politiska
klangbotten
engagemang,
de
ideologiska
bevekelsegrunder
kommer
uttryck,
förändringsstrategier
sätts
spel,
allianser
bildas.
Detta
är
miljösociologiskt
intresse
att
undersöka
lovvärda
ambitioner
visioner
om
klimatneutralt
samhälle
omsätts
praktiken
samt
belysa
maktrelationer
annars
riskerar
osynliggöras.
Vi
finner
generellt
tvingas
förhålla
sig
dominerande
innovationsorienterad
diskurs
med
avpolitiserande
effekt.
Samtidigt
florerar
mångfald
andra
sätt
“energigemenskapa,”
vilka
återspeglar
värden
avviker
från
den
diskursen.
Environmental Policy and Governance,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
33(6), P. 583 - 592
Published: Nov. 5, 2023
Abstract
The
global
environmental
crisis
is
the
result
of
a
complex
web
causation
and
distributed
agency,
where
not
even
most
powerful
individual
actors
can
be
considered
responsible
nor
remedy
situation
alone.
This
has
prompted
multiple
calls
across
societies
for
transformative
social
change.
What
role
accountability
play
in
this
context?
Starting
theoretical
traditions
microsociology
pragmatic
sociology,
article
elaborates
interactions.
To
provide
an
account
that
justifies
action
or
inaction
here
understood
as
process
ordering,
accounts
are
assessed
acceptable
only
after
they
have
been
tested
against
higher
normative
principles.
Microsocial
practices
are,
way,
linked
to
macrosocial
order.
following
section
turns
crisis,
showing
raises
well
epistemic
challenges.
complexity
socio‐environmental
makes
it
hard
know
what
should
done
opens
orders
claims
contestation.
provides
increased
opportunities
strategic
maneuvering
justify
actions
question
concludes
by
discussing
climate
Accountability
serve
mechanism
attach
issues
current
re‐embed
decisions
practice
moral
As
part
broader
palette
instruments,
rules
norms,
important
function
transforming
society
towards
sustainability.
Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
20(1)
Published: March 8, 2023
Organizations
conducting
global
environmental
assessments
(GEAs)
face
the
challenge
of
not
only
producing
trustworthy
and
policy-relevant
knowledge
but
also
recruiting
training
experts
to
conduct
these
GEAs.
These
must
acquire
skills
competencies
needed
produce
assessments.
By
adopting
an
institutional
approach,
this
paper
explores
IPBES's
epistemic
infrastructure
that
aims
communicate
form
expertise
is
its
The
empirical
material
consists
educational
material,
which
teaches
new
how
perform
assessment.
analysis
finds
three
crucial
tasks
introduced
in
are
expected
learn
perform.
concludes
by
discussing
broader
importance
findings
organizations
GEAs
passive
intermediaries
instead,
through
their
infrastructure,
generate
ways
understand
navigate
world,
both
for
those
who
create
receive
assessment
report.
Climatic Change,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
177(10)
Published: Oct. 1, 2024
Abstract
This
article
discusses
“academic
housekeeping”
undertaken
within
IPCC,
understood
as
the
work
that
is
rarely
made
visible
or
rewarded,
but
nevertheless
essential
to
success
of
organization.
It
explores
conditions,
motivations,
and
implications
for
individual
researchers
involved
in
with
particular
emphasis
on
invisible,
un(der)recognised
unrewarded
they
engage
in.
The
empirical
material
consists
an
interview
study
IPCC
assessment
work.
concludes
a
discussion
experts,
expert
organisations,
academic
institutions.
Abstract
Experts
play
a
significant
role
in
shaping
global
and
local
norms
on
how
societies
should
respond
to
the
climate
crisis.
However,
current
scholarship
relationship
between
expertise
change
has
not
fully
addressed
recent
transformations
field,
specifically
emergence
increasingly
influential
of
what
we
term
“green
transition
expertise.”
We
define
green
as
more
applied,
normative,
contextual
form
knowledge
that
is
contrasted
with
formalized,
pure
science
“climate
If
experts
assess
deteriorating
state
climate,
then
tell
states
corporations
they
do
about
it.
argue
if
social
further
deepen
its
grasp
politics
analytically
normatively,
it
must
embrace
“post‐IPCC”
research
agenda
turns
toward
studying
power
directing
corporate
action.
Based
review
literature,
contrast
extant
IPCC
an
emerging
post‐IPCC
along
three
dimensions:
expert
cast
(who
are
experts?),
content
(what
know?)
context
(where
located?).
By
marking
shift
each
these
dimensions,
sensitizes
overlooked
powerful
forms
expertise.
To
facilitate
their
study,
six
specific
areas
require
detailed
attention
develops.
This
article
categorized
under:
The
Social
Status
Climate
Change
Knowledge
>
Sociology/Anthropology
Policy
Governance
National
Climate,
History,
Society,
Culture
Ideas
Research Square (Research Square),
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Sept. 13, 2023
Abstract
In
line
with
the
IPCC’s
own
mandate
to
select
a
more
diverse
group
of
experts
contribute
their
assessments,
proportion
women
and
participants
from
Global
South
has
increased
over
recent
assessment
cycles.
Criticisms
remain,
however,
continued
dominance
institutions
North,
relative
place
different
disciplinary
transdisciplinary
knowledges
in
extent
which,
once
selected
participate,
underrepresented
groups
have
space
opportunity
speak
be
heard.
Taken
together,
these
criticisms
point
particular
weakness
diversity
agenda
–
that
an
imperative
been
institutionalised,
it
becomes
just
another
target
or
metric
gamed.
As
top-down,
depoliticised
measure,
institutional
can
serve
obscure
even
exacerbate
exclusion
marginalised
groups.
This
article
proposes
move
away
concentration
on
as
indicator
plurality
epistemic
strength
organisation,
towards
focus
politics
representation.
is
radical
two
specific
ways:
firstly,
entails
openness
transparency
IPCC
how
assessments
are
produced.
Representation
cannot
easily
quantified
but
must
observed
analysed
qualitatively.
Secondly,
understands
that,
unlike
diversity,
representation
requires
agency
capacity,
signifying
relationship
between
participant.
thus
conceptualised
political,
yet
impactful
way
extending
policy
(and
social)
relevance.
Frontiers in Climate,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
5
Published: Sept. 22, 2023
Due
to
the
long
timescales
and
deep
uncertainties
involved,
comprehensive
model-building
has
played
a
pivotal
role
in
creating
shared
expectations
about
future
trajectories
for
addressing
climate
change
processes,
mobilizing
network
of
knowledge-based
experts
who
assist
defining
common
problems,
identifying
policy
solutions,
assessing
outcomes.
At
intersection
between
science
governance,
where
wholly
empirical
methods
are
infeasible,
numerical
simulations
have
become
central
practice
evaluating
truth
claims,
key
medium
transport
translation
data,
methods,
guiding
principles
among
actors
involved.
What
makes
integrated
assessment
unique
as
modeling-effort
is
that
it
explicitly
policy-oriented,
justified
by
its
policy-relevance.
Although
recognized
Intergovernmental
Panel
on
Climate
Change
invaluable
their
review
assessments,
modeling
implementations
Paris
Agreement,
such
impact
assessments
legislation
national
level,
far
less
known.
Taking
starting-point
boundary-work
carried
out
public
administration,
this
paper
examines
how
foresight
knowledge
produced
with
help
model-based
scenario
analysis
been
made
relevant
Swedish
policymaking,
focusing
processes
which
indicators
political
action
institutionalized
through
choice
use
model
parameters.
It
concludes
arguing
an
expanded
understanding
policy-relevance,
beyond
institutional
approaches
toward
process-based
point
view,
treating
relevance
something
in-the-making.
Environmental Politics,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 1 - 22
Published: Dec. 26, 2024
Just
climate
transitions
require
transformations
reweaving
the
fabric
of
modern
societies
and
necessitate
co-production
knowledge
action
informed
by
ontological
epistemic
pluralism.
I
analyse
politics
just
as
politics,
observing
how
a
Swedish
research
programme
tries
to
bridge
ontologies
'green
modernity'
'resistance'
through
that
'planetary
boundaries'.
show
these
generate
distinctive
ideas
transition/transformation
justice,
governance
theories
praxes,
understandings
knowledge-action
links.
The
theoretical
framework
political
ontology
reflects
imperative
deepen
discussions
on
green
include
questions
'beyond
technical
fixes':
well-being,
reconnection
between
land
those
who
live
it,
recognition
colonial
legacy.
argue
go
beyond
tokenistic
co-production,
researchers
must
be
ready
able
successfully
navigate
in
which
production
is
inevitably
entangled.
npj Climate Action,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
3(1)
Published: Dec. 5, 2024
There
is
increasing
agreement
among
Australian
policymakers
and
stakeholders
that
climate
change
the
biggest
problem
facing
Great
Barrier
Reef.
However,
little
known
about
whether
this
convergence
shapes
perspectives
on
solutions.
To
understand
different
actor
solutions
for
Reef,
we
applied
a
'problem-solution'
framework
employing
Q-methodology
to
guide
in-depth
interviews
with
engaged
actors.
We
found
despite
growing
over
problem,
significant
divergence
remains.
identified
six
generalised
ranging
from
technology-led
adaptation
at
one
end
of
spectrum
radical
transitions
other.
support
market-led,
regionally-led,
represents
new
shift
toward
transformational
policy
beyond
conventional
bounds
GBR
governance.
multiple
divergent
suggest
more
reflexive
learning
required
effectively
govern
critical
ecosystem
into
future.