Mit CCS zur Klimaneutralität? DOI
Tobias Haas, Alina Brad, Etienne Schneider

et al.

PROKLA Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialwissenschaft, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 54(216), P. 431 - 450

Published: Aug. 30, 2024

Bis 2045 soll Deutschland klimaneutral sein. Ein zentraler Baustein dafür ist in den Klimaneutralitätsszenarien Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS). CCS erfährt heute breite Unterstützung aus verschiedenen Industriezweigen und nach Plänen der Ampelkoalition ein wichtiger deutschen Klimapolitik werden. Wir analysieren mittels historisch-materialistischen Policy-Analyse (HMPA) die Auseinandersetzungen um Etablierung dieser Technologie ihre Renaissance. Unsere These ist, dass Umgang mit schwer vermeidbaren Emissionen Schlüsselkonflikt Transformation zur Klimaneutralität ist. Hierbei geht es auch Frage, inwiefern Formen Naturbeherrschung auf eine neue Stufe gehoben werden, Wirtschaftswachstum anvisierten kompatibel zu machen.

Multidimensional sustainability implications of alternative iron and steel industry decarbonization strategies in China DOI
Ming Ren,

Bo‐Han Zhu,

Chen Huang

et al.

Resources Conservation and Recycling, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 215, P. 108136 - 108136

Published: Jan. 23, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

1
Residual emissions in long-term national climate strategies show limited climate ambition DOI Creative Commons
Harry Smith, Naomi E. Vaughan, Johanna Forster

et al.

One Earth, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 7(5), P. 867 - 884

Published: May 1, 2024

Net-zero targets imply a need to compensate for residual emissions through the deployment of carbon dioxide removal methods. Yet extent within national climate plans, alongside their distribution, is largely unexplored. Here, we analyze 71 long-term strategies understand how governments engage with emissions. Screening 139 scenarios, determined that only 26 quantify Residual are on average 21% peak Annex I countries, ranging from 5% 52% (excluding land use). For non-Annex 34%. By sector, agriculture represents largest contributor total (on average, 36% countries and 35% countries). High-residual-emission scenarios show some may retain or expand fossil fuel production use, using more international offsets achieve net zero.

Language: Английский

Citations

7
From net-zero to zero-fossil in transforming the EU energy system DOI Creative Commons
Felix Schreyer, Falko Ueckerdt, Robert Pietzcker

et al.

Research Square (Research Square), Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Jan. 9, 2025

Abstract The EU climate neutrality goal requires a strong reduction in fossil fuel use by 2050. However, whether complete phase-out is feasible and desirable remains unclear. Here, using an integrated assessment model, we quantify the additional effort needed to achieve virtually of fuels 2050 compared least-cost net-zero scenario. In this scenario, already decreases 87% from 2020 2050, driven renewable power, direct electrification some biofuels. hard-to-abate oil-based hydrocarbons natural gas persist are used primarily for chemicals, aviation shipping. Phasing-out these remaining 13% large-scale deployment costly carbon-neutral e-fuels, which about doubles marginal abatement costs 300€/tCO2 650 €/tCO2 (500-1000 €/tCO2) Although target could strengthen policy commitment, it also poses transformation challenges.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Review of Economics and Policies of Carbon Dioxide Removal DOI Creative Commons
So‐Young Oh, Jenna Greene, Matthias Honegger

et al.

Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 12(1)

Published: March 7, 2025

Abstract Purpose of review Despite the increasing political attention and support, high costs many carbon dioxide removal (CDR) technologies remain a barrier to their large-scale deployment. We provide an overview economics for two key CDR options – BECCS DACCS proposed existing policies address “CDR gap” in achieving long-term temperature goals Paris Agreement. Summary Although we lack detailed cost breakdowns actual projects, our suggests that range is generally lower than DACCS. The parameter sustainability biomass feedstock, energy intensity. Recent Findings Cost estimates have increased due experiences from commercial operation, they are increasingly differentiated according feedstock.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Interactions within climate policyscapes: a network analysis of the electricity generation space in the United Kingdom, 1956–2022 DOI Creative Commons

Valeria Zambianchi,

Katja Biedenkopf

Frontiers in Climate, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 6

Published: May 9, 2024

The systems of policies impacting climate change mitigation are complex. Yet, to date, we have limited conceptual and empirical knowledge on the dynamics within these. We address this gap by employing a lens untangle interactions between affecting in electricity generation space. conceptualise policyscapesfor as populated with whose means impact decarbonisation impacts under analysis include both support obstruction mitigation. analyse evolution UK policyscape from 1956 2022. Methodologically, combine qualitative content network analysis. populate policyscapes pieces legislation space employ identify policy Our 2022 reveals that hindering remain largely present, which renders incoherent. show supporting more likely behave group than Climate tend be adopted packages, whilst fossil steady process throughout history policyscape.

Language: Английский

Citations

1
The politics of carbon management in Austria: Emerging fault lines on carbon capture, storage, utilization and removal DOI Creative Commons
Alina Brad, Etienne Schneider,

Danyal Maneka

et al.

Energy Research & Social Science, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 116, P. 103697 - 103697

Published: Aug. 1, 2024

With the proliferation of net zero targets in climate policy and corporate governance, question how to deal with greenhouse gas emissions considered hard-to-abate is attracting growing attention. In this context, notion carbon management has emerged on political agenda – an umbrella term typically encompassing capture storage (CCS), utilization (CCU) dioxide removal (CDR). Here, we investigate emerging politics around design a national strategy Austria, country which can be yet understudied latecomer regarding CCS novel CDR methods including BECCS DACCS. Based expert interviews actors as well qualitative document analysis, identify four actor coalitions key fault lines. These lines specifically relate a) whether ban Austria should lifted, b) economic sectors get access transport infrastructure subsidy schemes (selective vs. unrestricted integration). We also find that framing CCS, CCU under produces specific coalitional effects while simultaneously concealing contested choices finding wider implications beyond Austrian case.

Language: Английский

Citations

1
Mit CCS zur Klimaneutralität? DOI
Tobias Haas, Alina Brad, Etienne Schneider

et al.

PROKLA Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialwissenschaft, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 54(216), P. 431 - 450

Published: Aug. 30, 2024

Bis 2045 soll Deutschland klimaneutral sein. Ein zentraler Baustein dafür ist in den Klimaneutralitätsszenarien Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS). CCS erfährt heute breite Unterstützung aus verschiedenen Industriezweigen und nach Plänen der Ampelkoalition ein wichtiger deutschen Klimapolitik werden. Wir analysieren mittels historisch-materialistischen Policy-Analyse (HMPA) die Auseinandersetzungen um Etablierung dieser Technologie ihre Renaissance. Unsere These ist, dass Umgang mit schwer vermeidbaren Emissionen Schlüsselkonflikt Transformation zur Klimaneutralität ist. Hierbei geht es auch Frage, inwiefern Formen Naturbeherrschung auf eine neue Stufe gehoben werden, Wirtschaftswachstum anvisierten kompatibel zu machen.

Citations

0