Published: Dec. 27, 2024
Language: Английский
Published: Dec. 27, 2024
Language: Английский
Current Medical Science, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown
Published: Feb. 25, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
0Research Square (Research Square), Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown
Published: April 4, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
0JAAOS Global Research and Reviews, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 9(4)
Published: April 1, 2025
Background: A comprehensive review on the application of artificial intelligence (AI) within spine surgery as a specialty remains lacking. Methods: This scoping was conducted upon PubMed and EMBASE databases according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews Meta-Analyses guidelines. Our analysis focused publications from January 1, 2020, March 31, 2024, with specific focus AI in field surgery. Review articles predominantly concerning secondary validation algorithms, medical physics, electronic devices, biomechanics, preclinical, lack clinical emphasis were excluded. Results: One hundred five studies included after our inclusion/exclusion criteria applied. Most (n = 100) through supervised learning prelabeled data sets. Overall, 38 used conventional machine methods predefined features, whereas 67 deep methods, image analyses. Only 25.7% (27/105) collected more than 1,000 patients model development validation. Data originated only single center 72 studies. The most common prognostication (38/105), followed by diagnosis (35/105), processing (29/105), surgical assistance (3/105). Conclusion: domain has significant potential advance patient-specific diagnosis, management, execution.
Language: Английский
Citations
0Deleted Journal, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown
Published: July 24, 2024
Abstract Transfer learning (TL) is an alternative approach to the full training of deep (DL) models from scratch and can transfer knowledge gained large-scale data solve different problems. ImageNet, which a publicly available dataset, commonly used dataset for TL-based image analysis; many studies have applied pre-trained ImageNet clinical prediction tasks reported promising results. However, some questioned effectiveness using consists solely natural images, medical analysis. The aim this study was evaluate whether RadImageNet, could achieve superior performance in classification dental imaging modalities compared with models. To RadImageNet TL, two datasets were used. (1) classifying presence or absence supernumerary teeth panoramic radiographs (2) sex lateral cephalometric radiographs. Performance evaluated by comparing area under curve (AUC). On radiograph gave average AUCs 0.68 ± 0.15 ( p < 0.01), had values 0.74 0.19. In contrast, on demonstrated 0.76 0.09, achieved 0.75 0.17. difference between TL depends
Language: Английский
Citations
1Elsevier eBooks, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown
Published: Jan. 1, 2024
Language: Английский
Citations
0Published: Dec. 27, 2024
Language: Английский
Citations
0