Mobile-based in-home telerehabilitation compared with in-hospital face-to-face rehabilitation for elderly patients after total hip arthroplasty in China's level 1 trauma center: a noninferiority randomized controlled trial
Yang Zhou,
No information about this author
Yiming Lyu,
No information about this author
Qiaojie Wang
No information about this author
et al.
Frontiers in Surgery,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
11
Published: Jan. 14, 2025
Background
Telerehabilitation
is
gaining
popularity
in
European
and
American
countries,
but
whether
it
can
be
successfully
implemented
China
still
lacks
support
from
clinical
studies.
Objective
This
trial
aimed
to
determine
if
a
home-based
telerehabilitation
method
clinically
noninferior
standard
in-hospital
face-to-face
rehabilitation
for
elderly
patients
with
total
hip
arthroplasty
(THA)
China.
Methods
multicenter
randomized
controlled
was
conducted
January
2021
June
2022
at
The
First
Rehabilitation
Hospital
Shanghai,
Shanghai
Jiao
Tong
University
affiliated
Sixth
People's
Tongji
Tenth
Hospital.
Sixty-four
were
recruited
this
two-arm,
single-assessor
blinded,
trial.
participants
randomly
assigned
the
in-home
group
(TELE
group)
physical
therapist
in-person
(PT
group).
intervention
consisted
of
12-week
program
video
instructions
remote
coaching
on
mobile
APP
PT
received
assisted
by
one
month
outpatient
clinic
next
two
months.
Patients
evaluated
baseline,
4
weeks,
12
weeks
postoperatively
employing
functional
tests
(Timed
Up
&
Go
test
Berg
balance
test)
self-reported
questionnaires
(Hip
disability
Osteoarthritis
Outcome
Score
(HOOS)
Short
Form
(SF-12)).
Results
There
no
significant
difference
between
groups
demographic
characteristics.
61
analyzed
group:
n
=
31,
women:
48.4%
participants;
TELE
30,
33.3%
participants)
whose
median
age
70
69
years,
(IQR:
63–73)
66–72)
respectively.
At
follow-up
evaluation,
main
differences
regarding
HOOS
gains,
adjusted
baseline
values,
close
zero
(
P
>
0.05).
primary
secondary
outcome
measures
groups.
Conclusion
Our
results
showed
noninferiority
advocated
its
application
as
reliable
alternative
who
underwent
THA.
Clinical
Trial
Registration
https://www.chictr.org.cn/
,
Chinese
Registry
(Number:
ChiCTR1900025825).
Language: Английский
Different intensities of aerobic training for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial
Chi Su,
No information about this author
Lihua Huang,
No information about this author
Shaochen Tu
No information about this author
et al.
Frontiers in Endocrinology,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
15
Published: Sept. 2, 2024
Objective
The
purpose
of
this
study
was
to
compare
different
intensities
aerobic
exercise
for
patients
with
knee
osteoarthritis
(KOA)
and
type
2
diabetes
mellitus
(T2DM)
in
terms
glycemic
control,
pain
relief,
functional
outcomes.
Methods
A
prospective
randomized
open-label
parallel
multicenter
clinical
trial
conducted
at
two
hospitals
Shanghai
Sichuan
that
included
228
(KOA).
Enrollment
occurred
between
January
2021
February
2023,
follow-up
completed
September
2023.
Participants
were
threshold
training/high-intensive
stationary
cycling
training
(n=76),
intensive
endurance/moderate-intensive
(n=77),
regular
rehabilitation
programs
(n=75).
primary
outcome
the
6-month
HbA1c
level.
Key
secondary
outcomes
Knee
Injury
Osteoarthritis
Outcome
Score
(KOOS)
subscale
quality
life.
Results
Of
patients,
212
(93%)
trial.
mean
adjusted
(sex,
baseline
BMI,
measures)
level
decreased
significantly
high-intensive
group
compared
other
groups
(high-intensity
vs.
control
group;
difference,
0.51%,
95%
confidence
interval,
0.05%
1.15%).
Mean
KOOS
subscales
life
statistically
moderate-intensity
or
high-intensity
groups,
but
no
statistical
differences
noted
exercise.
Patients
all
achieved
a
greater
reduction
BMI
significant
observed
groups.
Conclusion
In
KOA
T2DM
can
improve
programs.
However,
does
not
exert
superior
effect
on
relief
improvement
Language: Английский