Climate Risk Management,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
43, P. 100573 - 100573
Published: Nov. 18, 2023
We
assessed
how
people
adapt
to
climate
change
in
the
context
of
forests
through
a
systematic
review
international
empirical
research
literature.
found
that
drought,
precipitation
variability,
extreme
and
flooding,
heat
were
climatic
stressors
which
responses
most
frequently
documented.
Individuals
households
received
attention,
followed
by
national
government,
civil
society,
local
government.
Europe
North
America
geographic
foci
more
than
other
regions.
Behavioral
reported
technical
infrastructural
institutional
responses.
Within
these
types
responses,
actors
used
wide
variety
practices
such
as
replanting,
altering
species
composition,
adopting
or
changing
technology.
Adaptation
efforts
early
planning
advanced
implementation
some
but
expanding
reported.
While
connections
between
risk
reduction
discussed,
there
is
limited
evidence
reduction.
Our
contributes
scholarly
practical
understanding
forests.
The
also
identifies
opportunities
for
future
on
adaptation
stressors,
wildfires
tree
pests
pathogens,
areas,
especially
Oceania,
beyond
individual
household
level
efforts.
Abstract
Nature‐based
solutions
(NbS,
and
related
concepts
like
natural
infrastructure,
Ecosystem‐based
Adaptation,
green
infrastructure)
are
increasingly
recognized
as
multi‐benefit
strategies
for
addressing
the
critical
sustainability
challenges
of
Anthropocene,
including
climate
emergency
biodiversity
crisis.
Mainstreaming
NbS
in
professional
practice
requires
strategic,
landscape‐level
planning
integrating
multiple
sources
benefits
their
synergies
trade‐offs.
Levee
setbacks
(LS)
among
best‐studied
riverine
with
flood
risk
management,
drought
resilience,
water
quality
recreational
opportunities,
ecological
restoration
biodiversity.
Although
awareness
multifarious
LS
forms
Natural
Capital
is
growing,
implementation
remains
ad‐hoc
opportunistic.
To
address
this
gap
one
major
example
NbS,
we
review
synthesize
literature
across
diverse
disciplines
to
provide
an
overview
primary
social,
economic,
mechanisms
that
affect
co‐benefit
delivery
projects.
Next,
make
information
relevant
practitioners,
link
these
spatial
metrics
can
be
used
approximate
relative
magnitude
project
costs
mechanisms.
Finally,
highlight
examples
key
trade‐offs
should
considered
planning.
This
synthetic
approach
intended
familiarize
readers
potential
LS,
understanding
how
select
prioritize
sites
further
study
implementation.
Synergies
important
benefit
drivers
abound,
social
equity
concerns
will
paramount
ensuring
successful
other
future.
article
categorized
under:
Engineering
Water
>
Sustainable
Planning
Life
Nature
Freshwater
Ecosystems
Landscape and Urban Planning,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
251, P. 105169 - 105169
Published: July 18, 2024
Protecting
and
enhancing
biodiversity
in
urban
areas
is
critical
for
meeting
international
conservation
commitments,
has
a
vital
role
to
play
the
health
wellbeing
of
city
residents.
Yet,
urbanisation
can
have
devastating
impacts
on
biodiversity,
with
development
typically
delivering
landscapes
which
habitat
remains
only
as
small,
fragmented
patches,
surrounded
by
an
inhospitable
matrix.
As
cities
begin
plan
alongside
other
land
use
considerations,
planners
leverage
ecological
knowledge
planning
concepts
aid
decision
making
deliver
benefits
nature
people.
Here
we
demonstrate
how
targeted
green
infrastructure
placement
potentially
increase
delivery
landscape
level
improving
connectivity
native
species.
We
measure
change
when
parking
spaces
are
converted
small
across
City
Melbourne,
Australia.
test
three
reallocation
scenarios
varying
levels
space
conversion
spatial
prioritisation
connectivity.
While
scenario
that
maximised
number
performed
best,
show
greening
delivered
strongest
outcomes
per
unit
area
converted.
Improvements
were
two
times
higher
effort
was
towards
locations
identified
important
barriers
landscape-level
movement.
Our
research
emphasises
advantage
strategically
investment
support
biodiversity.
Landscape and Urban Planning,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
239, P. 104856 - 104856
Published: Aug. 4, 2023
Urban
green
infrastructure
can
help
cities
tackle
biodiversity
loss
and
support
well-being,
but
also
contribute
to
climate
change
mitigation.
This
be
enhanced
with
policies
that
favor
biodiversity,
residential
or
benefits
such
as
carbon
sequestration.
However,
assessing
public
for
favoring
specific
outcomes,
potential
trade-offs
between
them,
is
vital
understanding
the
social
implications
may
have
upon
implementation.
paper
presents
results
of
a
participation
GIS
(PPGIS)
survey
(n
=
3
237)
in
Helsinki,
Finland,
concerning
diverse
climate,
well-being
outcomes
infrastructure.
The
survey,
derived
spatial
aspatial
analyses,
indicate
urban
residents
strongly
sequestration,
are
more
willing
compromise
benefits,
rather
than
benefits.
reveal
how
different
varies
spatially
across
city,
manifesting
into
priority
areas
outcomes.
Finally,
ways
valuing
utilizing
infrastructure,
socio-economic
background
respondents,
predict
Our
methods
take
global
political
targets
mitigating
reversing
practice
manner
acknowledges
plurality
understandings
on
should
managed,
whom,
most
importantly,
where.
Journal of Ecology,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
112(11), P. 2502 - 2509
Published: Aug. 19, 2024
Abstract
Nature‐based
solutions
(NbS)
have
emerged
at
the
science,
policy
and
practitioner
interface
to
address
environmental
challenges
facing
society.
NbS
involve
people
working
with
nature
protect,
restore
or
manage
ecosystems.
Yet
vary
extent
they
support
biological
diversity
which
has
implications
for
ecological
resilience.
We
reviewed
how
resilience
been
conceptualised
in
literature.
The
literature
included
reference
both
specific
disturbances
general
future
change.
found
reporting
of
mechanisms
was
limited
except
afforestation
efforts
where
there
is
increasing
recognition
role
species
contributing
Reporting
that
operate
within
populations
(e.g.
genetic
diversity)
landscape
scale
connectivity).
Resistance
overlooked
despite
prevalence
intended
climate
From
broader
literature,
we
distilled
identified
native
experimental
ecosystems
suggested
interventions
emergence
NbS.
Synthesis
.
Interventions
conserve
biodiversity
such
as
retaining
restoring
ecosystems,
are
critical
given
biodiversity,
across
scales
organisation,
underpins
several
Environmental Management,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Jan. 7, 2025
Abstract
The
Nature
Restoration
Law
adopted
by
the
European
Union
in
2024
aims
to
implement
measures
restore
at
least
20%
of
its
land
and
sea
2030
all
ecosystems
need
restoration
2050,
focusing
on
among
others
agricultural
land,
forests,
urban,
marine,
freshwater,
wetlands
areas.
goal
is
enhance
natural
semi-natural
habitats’
role
achieving
climate
targets
preserving
biodiversity.
Member
States
must
submit
detailed
national
plans,
outlining
specific
actions
mechanisms
for
monitoring
progress.
However,
these
plans
should
align
with
ongoing
Common
Agricultural
Policy
National
Energy
Climate
Plans
objectives.
Using
data
from
Commission
reports
applying
a
semantic
interval
scale
methodology,
this
study
quantifies
each
State’s
ambitions
effectiveness
under
establishes
benchmark
reporting
Law.
findings
reveal
Plans’
wide
disparities
implementing
decarbonization
measures,
change
adaptation
implementation
nature-based
solutions.
exhibit
only
partial
commitment
greening
agriculture,
yet
their
alignment
objectives
varies.
Therefore,
timely
coordination
between
three
strategies
crucial
avoid
conflicting
goals,
overlapping
efforts,
wasting
time
resources,
ensuring
success
actions.
Sustainability,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
17(3), P. 1131 - 1131
Published: Jan. 30, 2025
The
increasing
pressure
on
urban
systems
and
buildings
in
South
Africa
caused
by
rapid
urbanization
climate
change
necessitates
innovative
approaches,
including
Nature-based
Solutions
(NbSs),
to
address
environmental
societal
challenges.
As
such,
this
study
aimed
determine
the
dynamic
role
of
NbSs
shaping
sustainability
Africa’s
built
environment.
Using
a
quantitative
approach,
data
were
collected
via
questionnaire
survey,
which
targeted
environment
professionals.
Data
analysis
involved
reliability
testing,
confirmatory
factor
analysis,
Spearman
rank
order
correlation.
survey
showed
that
green
roofs,
rainwater
harvesting,
cool
roofing
pavements,
as
well
living
walls,
have
received
above-average
attention
country,
while
agricultural
byproducts
from
concrete
construction,
bioswales,
rain
gardens,
algae-based
materials
are
yet
be
explored
delivery
sustainable
areas.
Overall,
deploying
promises
positive
environmental,
societal,
economic
impacts.
findings
emphasize
need
for
stronger
policies
regulations
promote
adoption
underutilized
within
African
Theoretically,
contributes
existing
discourse
development
Africa.
nation
grapples
with
diverse
social
issues,
becomes
timely,
it
provides
crucial
insights
into
how
can
some
these
Environmental Policy and Governance,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Jan. 29, 2025
ABSTRACT
The
implementation
of
natural
stormwater
management
(SWM),
namely
SWM
carried
out
through
nature‐based
solutions
(NBS),
is
still
problematic
despite
their
benefits
in
climate
change
adaptation.
Private
landownership
commonly
cited
as
the
factor
limiting
extensive
NBS.
However,
Finnish
model
demonstrates
that,
regardless
whether
needed
land
private
or
public,
implementing
actors
face
numerous
legal
challenges
efforts
to
carry
using
We
study
and
use
planning
frameworks
uncover
barriers
drivers
NBS
well
interaction
with
wider
governance
setting.
By
doing
so,
we
highlight
need
for
a
regulatory
approach
that
will
facilitate
uptake.
first
explore
how
framework
regulates
SWM.
Secondly,
policy
arrangement
(PAA)
on
stability
flood
risk
combine
results
analysis
findings
from
series
interviews
urban
planners
several
municipalities.
This
turn
enables
us
visualise
law
interacts
broader
system
limit
shape
options
main
factors
(namely,
keeping
status
quo)
include
lack
regulations
unclear
fragmented
responsibilities.
encouraging
cities'
acquisition
ownership
public
land,
an
integrated
SWM,
Green
Area
Factor
(GAF),
pilot
projects
working
groups.