Helicases in R-loop Formation and Resolution
Shizhuo Yang,
No information about this author
Lacey Winstone,
No information about this author
Sohaumn Mondal
No information about this author
et al.
Journal of Biological Chemistry,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
299(11), P. 105307 - 105307
Published: Sept. 29, 2023
With
the
development
and
wide
usage
of
CRISPR
technology,
presence
R-loop
structures,
which
consist
an
RNA–DNA
hybrid
a
displaced
single-strand
(ss)
DNA,
has
become
well
accepted.
structures
have
been
implicated
in
variety
circumstances
play
critical
roles
metabolism
nucleic
acid
relevant
biological
processes,
including
transcription,
DNA
repair,
telomere
maintenance.
Helicases
are
enzymes
that
use
ATP-driven
motor
force
to
unwind
double-strand
(ds)
dsRNA,
or
hybrids.
Additionally,
certain
helicases
strand-annealing
activity.
Thus,
possess
unique
positions
for
biogenesis:
they
utilize
their
activity
promote
hybridization
RNA
leading
formation
R-loops;
conversely,
unwinding
separate
hybrids
resolve
R-loops.
Indeed,
numerous
such
as
senataxin
(SETX),
Aquarius
(AQR),
WRN,
BLM,
RTEL1,
PIF1,
FANCM,
ATRX
(alpha-thalassemia/mental
retardation,
X-linked),
CasDinG,
several
DEAD/H-box
proteins
reported
while
other
helicases,
Cas3
UPF1,
stimulate
formation.
Moreover,
like
DDX1,
DDX17,
DHX9
identified
both
resolution.
In
this
review,
we
will
summarize
latest
understandings
regarding
metabolism.
highlight
challenges
associated
with
drug
discovery
context
targeting
these
helicases.
R-loops
three-stranded
consisting
single-stranded
DNA.
They
various
transcriptional
regulation
replication,
genomic
instability,
class
switch
recombination
B
cells,
damage
maintenance
(1Brickner
J.R.
Garzon
J.L.
Cimprich
K.A.
Walking
tightrope:
complex
balancing
act
genome
stability.Mol.
Cell.
2022;
82:
2267-2297Google
Scholar,
2Petermann
E.
Lan
L.
Zou
Sources,
resolution
physiological
relevance
RNA-DNA
hybrids.Nat.
Rev.
Mol.
Cell
Biol.
23:
521-540Google
3Hegazy
Y.A.
Fernando
C.M.
Tran
E.J.
The
biology:
good,
bad,
ugly.J.
Chem.
2020;
295:
905-913Google
4Niehrs
C.
Luke
B.
Regulatory
facilitators
gene
expression
stability.Nat.
21:
167-178Google
5Garcia-Muse
T.
Aguilera
A.
R
loops:
from
pathological
roles.Cell.
2019;
179:
604-618Google
Scholar).
group
molecular
motors
energy
nucleoside
triphosphate
hydrolysis
remodel
molecules,
protein–nucleic
interactions
(6Brosh
Jr.,
R.M.
Bohr
V.A.
Human
premature
aging,
repair
RecQ
helicases.Nucleic
Acids
Res.
2007;
35:
7527-7544Google
7Dillingham
M.S.
Superfamily
I
modular
components
DNA-processing
machines.Biochem.
Soc.
Trans.
2011;
39:
413-423Google
8Bernstein
Gangloff
S.
Rothstein
R.
repair.Annu.
Genet.
2010;
44:
393-417Google
9Jankowsky
at
work:
binding
rearranging.Trends
Biochem.
Sci.
36:
19-29Google
Notably,
some
also
strand
annealing
(10Wu
Y.
Unwinding
rewinding:
double
faces
helicase?.J.
Nucleic
Acids.
2012;
2012140601Google
This
property
allows
them
crucial
biogenesis.
can
double-stranded
facilitate
invasion,
hybridize
ssDNA,
enabling
Conversely,
assembly
disassembly.
For
example,
SETX
(Senataxin),
AQR
(Aquarius),
WRN
(Werner
syndrome),
BLM
(Bloom
RTEL1
(Regulator
elongation
helicase
1),
PIF1
(Petite
integration
factor
FANCM
(Fanconi
anemia
complementation
M),
CasDinG
(CRISPR-associated
DinG
protein),
contrast,
UPF1
(Up-frameshift
protein
1)
involved
Several
excellent
reviews
available
functions
Specific
metabolism,
nuclease
RNase
H
(11Cerritelli
S.M.
Sakhuja
K.
Crouch
R.J.
H1,
gold
standard
detection.Methods
2528:
91-114Google
12Silva
Guillen-Mendoza
H1
hybrid-binding
domain-based
tools
cellular
biology
studies
DNA-RNA
mammalian
cells.Methods
115-125Google
13Wulfridge
P.
Yan
Q.
Sarma
Targeted
approaches
mapping
native
R-loops.Methods
373-380Google
Scholar)
topoisomerase
(14Patel
P.S.
Krishnan
Hakem
Emerging
topoisomerases
R-loops.Mutat.
Toxicol.
Environ.
Mutagen.
876-877503450Google
15Saha
Pommier
R-loops,
type
cancer.NAR
Cancer.
2023;
5:
zcad013Google
Scholar),
discussed
extensively.
However,
comprehensive
understanding
biogenesis
is
missing.
knowledge
addition,
review
address
related
efforts
While
were
first
observed
vitro
1976
(16Thomas
M.
White
R.L.
Davis
R.W.
Hybridization
DNA:
R-loops.Proc.
Natl.
Acad.
U.
1976;
73:
2294-2298Google
existence
vivo
was
not
until
1995
bacteria
(17Drolet
Phoenix
Menzel
Masse
Liu
L.F.
Overexpression
partially
complements
growth
defect
Escherichia
coli
delta
topA
mutant:
major
problem
absence
I.Proc.
1995;
92:
3526-3530Google
initially
considered
by-product
transcription
where
nascent
transcribed
by
polymerase
remains
base
paired
its
template
leaving
non-template
ssDNA.
Now,
it
known
occur
genome-wide
present
all
organisms,
humans
(18Jiang
Huang
F.
Chen
Gu
J.H.
Wu
Y.W.
Jia
M.Y.
et
al.Genome-wide
map
reveals
interplay
integrity
during
germ
cell
meiosis.J
Adv
51:
45-57Google
19Jauregui-Lozano
J.
Cottingham
Hall
H.
Tissue-specific,
Drosophila
using
MapR.Bio
Protoc.
12e4516Google
20Ginno
P.A.
Lott
P.L.
Christensen
H.C.
Korf
I.
Chedin
distinctive
characteristic
unmethylated
human
CpG
island
promoters.Mol.
45:
814-825Google
21Scheuren
Mohner
Zischler
landscape
mature
sperm:
regulatory
evolutionary
implications.Front.
141069871Google
techniques
demonstrate
exist
naturally
cells.
system,
ssRNA
(guide
RNA)
targeted
displaces
forms
structure;
endonuclease
Cas
then
cleaves
(5Garcia-Muse
22Crossley
M.P.
Bocek
regulators
threats.Mol.
398-411Google
form
breaks
(DSBs)
telomeres
(Fig.
1).
Generally,
categorized
either
programmed,
whereas
nonprogrammed.
Pathological
threaten
stability
ways,
generating
transcription-replication
collisions,
(SSBs),
DSBs
(23Li
X.
Manley
Inactivation
SR
splicing
ASF/SF2
results
instability.Cell.
2005;
122:
365-378Google
24Paulsen
R.D.
Soni
D.V.
Wollman
Hahn
A.T.
Yee
M.C.
Guan
al.A
siRNA
screen
diverse
processes
pathways
mediate
2009;
228-239Google
On
hand,
comprise
immunoglobulin
switching
cells
vertebrates
(25Yu
Hsieh
C.L.
Wilson
T.E.
Lieber
M.R.
regions
chromosomes
stimulated
cells.Nat.
Immunol.
2003;
4:
442-451Google
editing
CRISPR-Cas9
(26Jiang
Taylor
D.W.
J.S.
Kornfeld
J.E.
Zhou
Thompson
A.J.
al.Structures
primed
cleavage.Science.
2016;
351:
867-871Google
mitochondrial
replication
(27Holt
I.J.
metabolism.Methods
173-202Google
specific
steps
(28Huertas
Cotranscriptionally
formed
DNA:RNA
impairment
transcription-associated
recombination.Mol.
12:
711-721Google
DSB
(29Ouyang
Yadav
Zhang
J.M.
Yang
Rheinbay
Guo
al.RNA
transcripts
homologous
forming
DR-loops.Nature.
2021;
594:
283-288Google
CGG
repeat
contraction
(30Lee
H.G.
Imaichi
Kraeutler
Aguilar
Lee
Sheridan
S.D.
al.Site-specific
induce
fragile
X
reactivation.Cell.
186:
2593-2609.e18Google
maintaining
homeostasis
(31Ngo
G.H.P.
Grimstead
J.W.
Baird
D.M.
promotes
loops
break
repair.Nat.
Commun.
3849Google
Furthermore,
III
catalyze
DSBs,
transient
protect
3ʹ
overhang
degradation
before
A
(RPA)
binding,
demonstrating
essential
intermediate
process
(HR)-mediated
(32Liu
Hua
Wang
Li
Yuan
required
recombination.Cell.
184:
1314-1329.e1310Google
These
findings
indicate
cause
negative
positive
outcomes
depending
on
environment
R-loop.
must
be
tightly
regulated
balance
properly.
neurodegenerative
disorders
cancers
dysregulated
more
than
half
patients
neuroinflammatory
Aicardi-Goutières
syndrome
(AGS)
biallelic
mutations
H2
(33Crow
Y.J.
Chase
D.S.
Lowenstein
Schmidt
Szynkiewicz
Forte
G.M.
Gornall
H.L.
al.Characterization
disease
phenotypes
TREX1,
RNASEH2A,
RNASEH2B,
RNASEH2C,
SAMHD1,
ADAR,
IFIH1.Am.
Med.
2015;
167A:
296-312Google
34Lim
Sanz
L.A.
Xu
Hartono
S.R.
Genome-wide
hypomethylation
RNA:DNA
accumulation
Aicardi-Goutieres
syndrome.Elife.
4e08007Google
ataxia
oculomotor
apraxia
2
(AOA2)
(35Moreira
Klur
Watanabe
Nemeth
A.H.
Le
Ber
Moniz
J.C.
al.Senataxin,
ortholog
yeast
helicase,
mutant
ataxia-ocular
2.Nat.
2004;
225-227Google
juvenile
amyotrophic
lateral
sclerosis
(ALS4)
(36Chen
Y.Z.
Bennett
Huynh
H.M.
Blair
I.P.
Puls
Irobi
al.DNA/RNA
(ALS4).Am.
Hum.
74:
1128-1135Google
AOA2
autosomal
recessive
loss
function,
ALS4
dominant
provoked
toxic
gain-of-function
(37Mersaoui
S.Y.
Yu
Z.
Coulombe
Karam
Busatto
F.F.
Masson
J.Y.
al.Arginine
methylation
DDX5
RGG/RG
motif
PRMT5
regulates
hybrids.EMBO
38e100986Google
syndrome,
expansion
trinucleotide
repeats
FMR1
leads
R–loop
contributes
chromosomal
instability
(38Chakraborty
Jenjaroenpun
McCulley
Hilali
S.E.
Haarer
al.Fragile
mental
retardation
prevents
global
chromosome
fragility.bioRxiv.
([preprint])https://doi.org/10.1101/601906Google
TDP-43
aberrant
formation,
damaging
contributing
ALS
(39Wood
Quinet
Lin
Y.L.
A.A.
Pasero
Ayala
Y.M.
al.TDP-43
dysfunction
defects.J.
133jcs244129Google
40Giannini
Bayona-Feliu
Sproviero
D.
Barroso
S.I.
Cereda
link
loop-mediated
damage.PLoS
16e1009260Google
tumorigenesis,
DDX41
myeloid
neoplasms
myelodysplastic
syndromes
(MDS)
acute
leukemia
(AML)
(41Truong
Pimanda
DDX41:
poster
child
familial
MDS/AML
grows
up.Blood.
141:
447-449Google
excessive
found
mutated
(42Weinreb
J.T.
Ghazale
N.
Pradhan
Gupta
V.
Potts
K.S.
Tricomi
al.Excessive
trigger
inflammatory
cascade
increased
HSPC
production.Dev.
56:
627-640.e625Google
43Shinriki
Hirayama
Nagamachi
Yokoyama
Kawamura
Kanai
al.DDX41
coordinates
prevent
stress
hematopoietic
cells.Leukemia.
2605-2620Google
Similarly,
EWS-FIL1
fusion
Ewing
sarcoma
induces
perturbs
HR
potentially
mediating
chemosensitivity
(44Gorthi
Romero
Loranc
Cao
Lawrence
Goodale
al.EWS-FLI1
increases
block
BRCA1
sarcoma.Nature.
2018;
555:
387-391Google
groups
employed
affinity
pull-down
BioID
(proximity-dependent
biotin
identification)
identify
(45Cristini
Groh
Kristiansen
Gromak
RNA/DNA
interactome
identifies
DXH9
player
termination
R-loop-associated
damage.Cell
Rep.
1891-1905Google
46Wu
Nance
Chu
Fazzio
T.G.
Characterization
R-loop-interacting
embryonic
stem
rRNA
processing
expression.Mol.
Proteomics.
20100142Google
47Wang
I.X.
Grunseich
Fox
Burdick
Zhu
Ravazian
al.Human
interact
hybrids.Genome
28:
1405-1414Google
48Mosler
Conte
Longo
G.M.C.
Mikicic
Kreim
Mockel
M.M.
al.R-loop
proximity
proteomics
role
instability.Nat.
7314Google
49Yan
Wulfridge
Doherty
Fernandez-Luna
Real
P.J.
Tang
H.Y.
al.Proximity
labeling
repertoire
site-specific
modulators.Nat.
13:
53Google
50Shinriki
2605Google
(Table
S1).
Kumar
al.
(51Kumar
Fournier
Stirling
P.C.
Integrative
analysis
prediction
proteins.G3
(Bethesda).
12jkac142Google
analyzed
five
datasets
only
12
common
proteins:
DDX5,
NAT10,
NPM1,
NOP2,
DDX18,
NOP58,
ALYREF,
U2AF1,
ILF3,
RBM14,
PDCD11,
MYBBP1A.
More
recently,
Marchena-Cruz
used
screening
coupled
AID-induced
readout
46
affect
(52Marchena-Cruz
Camino
L.P.
Bhandari
Silva
Marqueta-Gracia
J.J.
Amdeen
S.A.
al.DDX47,
MeCP2,
functionally
heterogeneous
factors
harmful
loops.Cell
42112148Google
seven
revealed
varying
results,
no
single
datasets.
Using
similar
approaches,
S9.6
antibody
Cristini
(46Wu
Myc-tagged
(50Shinriki
bait
Mosler
(48Mosler
(49Yan
largely
different
Collectively,
suggest
highly
variable
study
conditions
thus
additional
investigations
fully
elucidate
identity
proteins.
diversity
attributed
factors.
Firstly,
methods
may
lead
instance,
capture
stable
complexes
but
weak
interactions.
partners,
sensitivity
detect
potential
indirect
Secondly,
flaws
yield
false
positive—non-specific
non-specific
dsRNA
(53Smolka
J.A.
Recognition
creates
pervasive
artifacts
when
imaging
hybrids.J.
220e202004079Google
54Crossley
Brickner
Song
Zar
S.M.T.
Maw
S.S.
al.Catalytically
inactive,
purified
H1:
sensitive
probe
imaging.J.
220e202101092Google
consists
two
(H1
H2)
specificities
cycle
subcellular
location
(55Holmes
J.B.
Akman
G.
Wood
Cerritelli
Moss
al.Primer
retention
owing
catastrophic
replication.Proc.
112:
9334-9339Google
56Lockhart
Pires
V.B.
Bento
Kellner
Luke-Glaser
Yakoub
al.RNase
differentially
hybrids.Cell
29:
2890-2900.e2895Google
AID-based
ssDNA
Thirdly,
types
HeLa,
HEK293,
U2OS,
mouse
contribute
results.
Finally,
there
dynamic
change
undergo
changes,
resulting
amongst
Nevertheless,
despite
observations
proteins,
consistently
S1,
highlighted
yellow).
nucleases
specifically
target
degrade
molecule
within
(57Hyjek
Figiel
Nowotny
RNases
H:
structure
mechanism.DNA
Repair
(Amst).
84102672Google
primarily
localized
mitochondria
displays
G2/M-phase
(56Lockhart
We
believe
large
number
released
would
robust
eliminating
Consistent
initial
observation
threat
stability,
many
accumulation,
SETX,
AQR,
SMARCAL,
ATRX,
1).Table
1Helicases
metabolismHelicase
familyNameRole
R-loopDisease
main
phenotype/biological
functionNoteReferencesForm
R-loopResolve
R-loopHumanYeastSF1SETXSen1√AOA2
ALS4(58Mischo
H.E.
Gomez-Gonzalez
Grzechnik
Rondon
A.G.
Wei
W.
Steinmetz
al.Yeast
Sen1
protects
instability.Mol.
41:
21-32Google
149Alzu
Bermejo
Begnis
Lucca
Piccini
Carotenuto
al.Senataxin
associates
forks
fork
across
RNA-polymerase-II-transcribed
genes.Cell.
151:
835-846Google
Scholar)AQR√Splicing
factorAka
IBP160(150Sollier
Stork
C.T.
Garcia-Rubio
M.L.
Paulsen
Transcription-coupled
nucleotide
excision
R-loop-induced
2014;
777-785Google
Scholar)UPF1Upf1√Nonsense
mRNA
surveillance(31Ngo
Scholar)PIF1Rrm3,
ScPif1,
SpPfh1√Genomic
nucleus
mitochondriaS.
cerevisiae
members:
Rrm3
ScPif1;
pombe
one:
Pfh1(151Tran
P.L.T.
Pohl
T.J.
C.F.
Chan
Pott
Zakian
family
suppress
mediated
tRNA
genes.Nat.
2017;
815025Google
Scholar)SF2WRN√Werner
syndrome(63Marabitti
Lillo
Malacaria
Palermo
Sanchez
Pichierri
al.ATM
pathway
activation
limits
Werner
cells.Nucleic
47:
3485-3502Google
Scholar)BLMSgs1√Bloom
syndrome(65Chang
E.Y.
Novoa
C.A.
Aristizabal
M.J.
Segovia
Chaturvedi
al.RECQ-like
Sgs1
regulate
instability.J.
216:
3991-4005Google
Scholar)RTEL1√Telomere
shorteningInteracts
Poldip3(68Bjorkman
Johansen
S.L.
Schertzer
Kanellis
D.C.
Katsori
A.M.
Poldip3
responses
resolution.Genes
Dev.
34:
1065-1074Google
Scholar)FANCMMph1√Congenital
abnormalities,
pancytopenia,
infertility,
cancer
proneness(70Schwab
R.A.
Nieminuszczy
Shah
Langton
Lopez
Martinez
Liang
C.C.
al.The
fanconi
maintains
coordinating
transcription.Mol.
60:
351-361Google
71Hodson
van
Twest
Dylewska
O'Rourke
Tan
Murphy
V.J.
al.Branchpoint
translocation
remodelers
general
mechanism
removal.Cell
41111749Google
152Lafuente-Barquero
Graf
Lockhart
Smc5/6
Mph1
hybrid-mediated
13e1007136Google
Scholar)Polymerase
θ
(POLQ)√Xeroderma
PigmentosumHelicase
domain
(1–894
aa)
unwinds
vitro(73Ozdemir
A.Y.
Rusanov
Kent
Siddique
Pomerantz
R.T.
Polymerase
theta-helicase
efficiently
293:
5259-5269Google
Scholar)CasDinG
(Bacteria)√(74Domgaard
Cahoon
Armbrust
Redman
O.
Jolley
Thomas
al.CasDinG
5'-3'
dsDNA
three
accessory
domains
IV
immunity.Nucleic
8115-8132Google
75Cui
X.Y.
al.Type
IV-A
CRISPR-Csf
complex:
assembly,
targeting,
recruitment.Mol.
83:
2493-2508.e2495Google
Scholar)SNF2ATRXRad54√ATRX
syndromeA
recent
report
shows
unable
Scholar)(72Nguyen
D.T.
Voon
H.P.J.
Xella
Scott
Clynes
Babbs
chromatin
remodelling
suppresses
telomeric
repeats.EMBO
18:
914-928Google
Scholar)SMARCAL1√Schimke
Immunoosseous
DysplasiaAka
HARP,
helicase(71Hodson
153Yusufzai
Kadonaga
HARP
helicase.Science.
2008;
322:
748-750Google
Scholar)ZRANB3√African-specific
diabetesAka
(AH2)(71Hodson
Scholar)DEAD-boxDDX1√√Retinoblastoma
neuroblastoma(100Li
Germain
D.R.
Po
Language: Английский
Autism-Related Cc2d1a Heterozygous Mice: Increased Levels of miRNAs Retained in DNA/RNA Hybrid Profiles (R-loop)
Published: July 11, 2024
Autism
spectrum
disorder
(ASD)
is
a
complex
neurodevelopmental
disorder,
with
highly
variable
expression
of
phenotypes
(restricted
interest
or
activity
and
repetitive
behavior
in
communication
social
interactions),
genes
(mutation),
markers
(alteration
transcription)
pathways.
Loss
function
the
CC2D1A
gene
appears
to
primarily
affect
brain,
leading
range
behavioral
problems
humans.
In
our
study
published
2020;
we
found
that
expressions
miR-19a-3p,
miR-361-5p,
miR-150-5p,
miR-3613-3p,
miR-126-3p
miR-499a-5p
were
downregulated
serum
samples
autistic
patients
their
families.
Here,
acquired
non-Mendelian
hereditary
character
genetically
defined
mouse
model
autism
(Cc2d1a
+/-)
correlates
transcriptional
alteration
five
miRNAs.
We
seek
test
hypothesis
miRNA
levels
are
varying
by
changes
RNA/DNA
structure
during
development,
thereby
creating
transcription
alteration.
Behavioral
tests
conducted
on
offspring
Cc2d1a
+/-
mutant
control
mice,
such
as
novel
object,
interaction,
marble
burying
tail
suspension
behavior.
Two
RNA
fractions
isolated
from
hippocampal
tissues
sperm
cells
standard
TRIzol
extraction:
total
fraction
bound
DNA
form
DNA/RNA
hybrid
(R-loop).
The
investigated
quantitative
real-time
RT-PCR.
report
differences
distribution
miRNAs
hippocampus
between
male
female
mice
fractions,
particularly
colonies
mice.
Furthermore,
number
engaged
generally
higher
pedigree
than
group.
On
other
hand,
both
at
lower
controls.
R-loops
contribute
physiology
pathology
organisms
including
human
disease.
Here
variation
gender
tissue.
Our
results
suggest
these
directly
regulated
RNA.
Language: Английский
DSB profiles in human spermatozoa highlight the role of TMEJ in the male germline
Frontiers in Genetics,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
15
Published: July 8, 2024
The
male
mammalian
germline
is
characterized
by
substantial
chromatin
remodeling
associated
with
the
transition
from
histones
to
protamines
during
spermatogenesis,
followed
reversal
nucleohistones
in
pronucleus
preceding
zygotic
genome
activation.
Both
transitions
are
extensive
formation
of
DNA
double-strand
breaks
(DSBs),
requiring
an
estimated
5
10
million
transient
DSBs
per
spermatozoa.
Additionally,
high
transcription
rate
early
stages
spermatogenesis
leads
transcription-coupled
damage
meiotic
homologous
recombination,
potentially
further
contributing
DSB
landscape
mature
Once
meiosis
completed,
spermatozoa
remain
haploid
and
therefore
cannot
rely
on
error-free
but
instead
depend
error-prone
classical
non-homologous
end
joining
(cNHEJ).
This
damage/repair-scenario
proposed
be
one
main
causes
observed
paternal
mutation
propensity
human
evolution.
Recent
studies
have
shown
that
repaired
maternally
provided
Polθ
Caenorhabditis
elegans
through
Polθ-mediated
(TMEJ).
population
genetic
datasets
revealed
a
preponderance
TMEJ
signatures
variation.
Since
these
result
combined
effect
pronuclei,
we
used
BLISS-based
protocol
analyze
recurrent
sperm
heads
as
proxy
before
remodeling.
were
found
enriched
(YR)
n
short
tandem
repeats
evolutionarily
young
SINEs,
reminiscent
patterns
murine
spermatids,
indicating
evolutionary
hotspots
detected
similar
pattern
diploid
IMR90
cells
when
cNHEJ
was
selectively
inhibited,
significant
impact
absent
landscape.
Strikingly,
regions
most
retained
histones,
less
condensed
chromatin,
not
strongly
DSBs.
In
contrast,
fraction
H3K27me3
displayed
strong
association
preference
for
over
repair.
We
hypothesize
may
trigger
transgenerational
repair
priming
maternal
regions.
Language: Английский
Autism-Related Cc2d1a Heterozygous Mice: Increased Levels of miRNAs Retained in DNA/RNA Hybrid Profiles (R-Loop)
Biomolecules,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
14(9), P. 1183 - 1183
Published: Sept. 20, 2024
Autism
spectrum
disorder
(ASD)
is
a
complex
neurodevelopmental
with
highly
variable
expression
of
phenotypes
(restricted
interest
or
activity
and
repetitive
behavior
in
communication
social
interactions),
genes
(mutation),
markers
(alteration
transcription)
pathways.
Loss
function
the
CC2D1A
gene
appears
to
primarily
affect
brain,
leading
range
behavioral
problems
humans.
In
our
study
published
2020,
we
found
that
expressions
miR-19a-3p,
miR-361-5p,
miR-150-5p,
miR-3613-3p,
miR-126-3p
miR-499a-5p
were
downregulated
serum
samples
autistic
patients,
their
families
mouse
models
(Cc2d1a
+/−
valproic
acid
treated
males).
Here,
acquired
non-Mendelian
hereditary
character
genetically
defined
model
autism
+/−)
correlates
transcriptional
alteration
five
miRNAs.
We
seek
test
hypothesis
miRNA
levels
vary
by
changes
RNA/DNA
structure
during
development,
thereby
creating
transcription
cell
memory.
Behavioral
tests
conducted
on
offspring
Cc2d1a
(+/−)
mutant
control
mice,
such
as
novel
object,
interaction,
marble
burying
tail
suspension
behavior.
Two
RNA
fractions
isolated
from
hippocampal
tissues
sperm
cells
via
standard
TRIzol
extraction:
free
fraction
bound
DNA
form
DNA/RNA
hybrid
(R-loop).
The
investigated
quantitative
real-time
RT-PCR.
report
differences
distribution
miRNAs
hippocampus
between
male
female
particularly
colonies
mice.
Furthermore,
number
engaged
generally
higher
pedigree
than
group.
On
other
hand,
sperm,
both
are
at
lower
controls.
R-loops
contribute
physiology
pathology
organisms
including
human
disease.
variation
gender
tissue.
Our
results
suggest
these
directly
regulated
RNA.
Language: Английский
The interplay between epitranscriptomic RNA modifications and neurodegenerative disorders: Mechanistic insights and potential therapeutic strategies
Muhammad Abu Talha Safdar Hashmi,
No information about this author
Hooriya Fatima,
No information about this author
Sadia Ahmad
No information about this author
et al.
Ibrain,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
10(4), P. 395 - 426
Published: Nov. 11, 2024
Abstract
Neurodegenerative
disorders
encompass
a
group
of
age‐related
conditions
characterized
by
the
gradual
decline
in
both
structure
and
functionality
central
nervous
system
(CNS).
RNA
modifications,
arising
from
epitranscriptome
or
RNA‐modifying
protein
mutations,
have
recently
been
observed
to
contribute
significantly
neurodegenerative
disorders.
Specific
modifications
like
N6‐methyladenine
(m6A),
N1‐methyladenine
(m1A),
5‐methylcytosine
(m5C),
pseudouridine
adenosine‐to‐inosine
(A‐to‐I)
play
key
roles,
with
their
regulators
serving
as
crucial
therapeutic
targets.
These
epitranscriptomic
changes
intricately
control
gene
expression,
influencing
cellular
functions
contributing
disease
pathology.
Dysregulation
metabolism,
affecting
mRNA
processing
noncoding
biogenesis,
is
factor
these
diseases.
This
review
underscores
complex
relationship
between
disorders,
emphasizing
influence
modification
epitranscriptome,
exploring
function
enzymes
processes,
investigating
functional
consequences
within
pathways,
evaluating
potential
advancements
derived
assessing
epitranscriptome.
Language: Английский