Summary report of workshop II on governance for ocean-based negative emissions technologies DOI Open Access

Lina Röschel,

Barbara Neumann

Published: Dec. 22, 2023

This deliverable provides a summary of two-day expert workshop conducted in hybrid format. The workshop’s primary objective was aimed towards identifying future opportunities within the global ocean governance regime to strengthen ocean-based NETs comprehensive manner. organised by Research Institute for Sustainability – Helmholtz Centre Potsdam (RIFS) as part work Task 2.2 OceanNETs project. follows first online (see Deliverable 2.3) that identified challenges current framework NETs. second consisted breakout groups and plenary discussions designed explore scenarios reflect on potential regimes. Participants were asked concept „good governance” develop responses presented through specific prompts. They encouraged actively contribute advance our understanding

Language: Английский

Navigating stakeholder heterogeneity in carbon dioxide removal governance DOI Creative Commons
Yuwan Malakar, Kerryn Brent,

A.A. Bester

et al.

Published: Jan. 15, 2025

Citations

1
Equitable marine carbon dioxide removal: the legal basis for interstate benefit-sharing DOI Creative Commons
Neil Craik

Climate Policy, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 15

Published: Jan. 23, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Alkalinity Factory Can Achieve Positive Climate Benefits Within Decades DOI
Qian Yan, Liwen Zheng, Wen Zhuang

et al.

Journal of Cleaner Production, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 145406 - 145406

Published: March 1, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Review on CO2 removal from ocean with an emphasis on direct ocean capture (DOC) technologies DOI
Sumudu Karunarathne, Sara Andrenacci, Andrés Carranza-Abaíd

et al.

Separation and Purification Technology, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 353, P. 128598 - 128598

Published: June 28, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

3
Laying waste to the deep: parallel narratives of marine carbon dioxide removal and deep-seabed mining DOI Creative Commons

Susanna Lidström,

Lisa A. Levin, Sarah Seabrook

et al.

npj Ocean Sustainability, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 3(1)

Published: July 26, 2024

The deep ocean is increasingly featured in climate solution discussions. An emerging narrative suggests that marine carbon dioxide removal (mCDR) essential to meet global targets. argument made similar claims deep-seabed mining (DSM) necessary enable widespread electrification, both are framed as helping address change. We compare the structure and history of these narratives, highlighting while potential negative impacts on life have emerged a central feature debates about DSM, environmental social risks associated with mCDR yet receive recognition. In light this comparison, we argue harm needs be further emphasized considerations deploying mCDR.

Language: Английский

Citations

2
Carbon dioxide sequestration through mineralization from seawater: The interplay of alkalinity, pH, and dissolved inorganic carbon DOI

Noam Karo,

Gennadiy Itov,

Or Mayraz

et al.

Chemical Engineering Journal, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 500, P. 156380 - 156380

Published: Oct. 5, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

2
Science, international law, and policy across the air–sea interface DOI Creative Commons
Erik van Doorn, Christa Marandino, Andrew J. Peters

et al.

Elementa Science of the Anthropocene, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 12(1)

Published: Jan. 1, 2024

The objective of this perspective article is to determine the extent which processes operating across air–sea interface are considered in international environmental policy. ocean usually important but rarely a defining feature such policies. We will begin with brief introduction existing relevant treaties and policy frameworks. provisions within these be analyzed for instances when interactions they not. aim establish that there lack consideration regulation interaction between atmosphere ocean, something not compatible reality. Consequently, we point out examples where think could have been incorporated legislation. question why gap science policy, regarding interactions, posed our hypotheses answers outlined. concept so-called soft law related instruments, as 2015 United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, discussed. finalize review recommendations future policymaking interface.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Trade-Offs in Marine Policy Decisions Through the Lens of Literature DOI Creative Commons

Joyce D. G. R. de de Queiroz,

Débora Gutierrez, Helena Calado

et al.

Oceans, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 5(4), P. 982 - 1007

Published: Dec. 20, 2024

The ocean is increasingly affected by the rise in maritime activities. Increased anthropogenic pressures have led to environmental impacts and also intensified competition for space resources among various socioeconomic sectors. To mitigate these on marine ecosystems reduce conflicts, management tools processes such as protected areas (MPAs) spatial planning (MSP) become more prevalent. Trade-offs are inherent these, necessary meet specific conservation goals. In response, understanding managing trade-offs has crucial achieving sustainability. This study performs a bibliometric review identify types of discussed literature examines their operationalization sustainable use resources. analysis reveals that trade-offs, particularly those between development, interests stakeholders, most frequently addressed trade-off typically approached through integrative methods. comprehensive examination highlights significance recognizing addressing achieve effective conservation, aligning ecological integrity with interests.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Summary report of workshop II on governance for ocean-based negative emissions technologies DOI Open Access

Lina Röschel,

Barbara Neumann

Published: Dec. 22, 2023

This deliverable provides a summary of two-day expert workshop conducted in hybrid format. The workshop’s primary objective was aimed towards identifying future opportunities within the global ocean governance regime to strengthen ocean-based NETs comprehensive manner. organised by Research Institute for Sustainability – Helmholtz Centre Potsdam (RIFS) as part work Task 2.2 OceanNETs project. follows first online (see Deliverable 2.3) that identified challenges current framework NETs. second consisted breakout groups and plenary discussions designed explore scenarios reflect on potential regimes. Participants were asked concept „good governance” develop responses presented through specific prompts. They encouraged actively contribute advance our understanding

Language: Английский

Citations

0