Anti-KRAS G12C and Anti-EGFR Rechallenge in Chemotherapy-Refractory KRAS G12C–Mutated Colorectal Cancer: A Case Report DOI

Linda Morris,

Leontios Pappas, Aditya Pandey

et al.

JCO Precision Oncology, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 8

Published: Dec. 1, 2024

Language: Английский

An immunohistochemical and molecular genetic study of 60 colorectal carcinoma brain metastases in pursuit of predictive biomarkers for cancer therapy DOI

Jerzy Lasota,

Maciej Kaczorowski,

Małgorzata Chłopek

et al.

Human Pathology, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 155, P. 105717 - 105717

Published: Jan. 1, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

1

A common druggable signature of oncogenic c-Myc, mutant KRAS and mutant p53 reveals functional redundancy and competition among oncogenes in cancer DOI Creative Commons

M. Grześ,

Akanksha Jaiswar,

Marcin Grochowski

et al.

Cell Death and Disease, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 15(8)

Published: Aug. 31, 2024

The major driver oncogenes MYC, mutant KRAS, and TP53 often coexist cooperate to promote human neoplasia, which results in anticancer therapeutic opportunities within their downstream molecular programs. However, little research has been conducted on whether redundancy competition among affect programs ability drive neoplasia. By CRISPR‒Cas9-mediated downregulation we evaluated the proteomics transcriptomics of a panel cell lines with either one or three these activated, cancers lung, colon pancreas. Using RNAi screening commonly activated programs, found signature proteins - RUVBL1, HSPA9, XPO1, could be efficiently targeted by novel drug combinations studied cancer types. Interestingly, was controlled oncoproteins redundant competitive manner rather than cooperation. Each oncoprotein individually upregulated target genes, while upon oncogene co-expression each preferably dominant reduced influence others. This interplay mediated routes gene activation as case KRAS signaling c-Jun/GLI2 transcription factors bypassing c-Myc activation, p53 competing for binding promoters. global data from patient samples indicate that oncogenic are broad phenomena, may constitute even majority genes dependent oncoproteins, shown lung lines. Nevertheless, demonstrated harbor targets efficient combinations, limitations direct inhibition.

Language: Английский

Citations

5

Mechanisms of resistance to KRASG12C inhibitors in KRASG12C-mutated non-small cell lung cancer DOI Creative Commons
Ali Chour, Anne‐Claire Toffart,

E. Berton

et al.

Frontiers in Oncology, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 14

Published: Sept. 5, 2024

The KRAS protein, a product of the gene (V-ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog), functions as small GTPase that alternates between an active GTP-bound state (KRAS(ON)) and inactive GDP-bound (KRAS(OFF)).

Language: Английский

Citations

4

Assessment of the quality of life in metastatic colorectal cancer patients with KRAS gene mutant: a case-control study DOI Creative Commons

Fahmideh Bagrezaei,

Bahram Pourghassem Gargari,

Reza Eghdam Zamiri

et al.

BMC Cancer, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 25(1)

Published: Jan. 28, 2025

The mutation of the KRAS (Kirsten rat sarcoma virus) gene is a prevalent genetic alteration in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). According to previous research, this significantly affects clinical outcomes and quality life (QOL). This research investigated association between mutant status various aspects QOL mCRC patients. case-control study involved 90 admitted patients with mCRC. were either positive mutants (case group) or those without (control group). each patient was determined using standard molecular testing. evaluated through validated questionnaires from European Organization for Research Treatment Cancer (EORTC), including QLQ-C30 QLQ-CR29 questionnaire Differences groups odds analyzed appropriate statistical tests. Patients wild-type group had higher scores on global health (GHS) scale compared [(64.26 ± 4.63 vs. 49.63 4, crude; p = 0.019, adjusted; 0.024). mean score social functioning than [(40 5.84 24.81 4.39, 0.040, 0.021)]. Based questionnaire, average suboptimal both but insignificant. Further, crude adjusted analyses showed that linked improved [(crude; OR 1.013; P 0.044), (adjusted; 1.017; 0.019)] negatively associated GHS 0.983; 0.022), 0.982; 0.022)]. revealed low mCRC, notable difference functioning, among mutations. Further needed develop targeted interventions enhance mutation.

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Drugging the Undruggable and beyond: Emerging precision oncology approaches to target acquired resistance to KRAS G12C and KRAS G12D inhibitors DOI
Ramesh R. Kale, Charudatt Samant, Krishnadas Nandakumar

et al.

Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 151688 - 151688

Published: March 1, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Potency and Safety of KRAS G12C Inhibitors in Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review DOI Creative Commons
Sara El Zaitouni, Abdelilah Laraqui, Youssra Boustany

et al.

Clinical Medicine Insights Oncology, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 19

Published: Jan. 1, 2025

Background: The Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) gene, specifically the cysteine residue mutation KRAS (G12C), has garnered significant attention as a therapeutic target for solid cancer patients with mutations. Despite this interest, efficacy and safety profiles of G12C inhibitors remain incompletely understood. In study, we comprehensively evaluate effectiveness toxicity relevant (Sotorasib, Adagrasib, Garsorasib, Divarasib) in colorectal (CRC), non-small-cell lung (NSCLC), pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC). Methods: Our systematic review is guided by Preferred Reporting Items Systematic Reviews Meta-Analyses guidelines. We available clinical trials data on G12C-mutated tumors. searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, major international conferences from January 2020 until August 2023. Results: A total 17 eligible studies were included. inhibitions Sotorasib (41.2%) Adagrasib each them reported 7 studies. Divarasib was 2 (11.8%) Garsorasib 1 study (6.7%). showed benefit terms objective response rate (ORR) (7.1%-47%), progression-free survival (PFS) (4-6.8 months), overall (OS) (4-24 months); it more efficient NSCLC an OS years, PFS 6.3 months, ORR 41%. also activity (19%-53%), (3.3-11.1 (10.5-23.4 23.4 11.1 53.3%. 35.1%, 7.4 14 months PDAC, than which 21%, 4 6.9 months. However, are moderately CRC trials. Conclusion: This confirms that treated these inhibitors, exclusively or combined conventional therapies, achieve better treatment responses modulate progressions

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Mechanism of Action and Research Progress of Drugs Targeting KRAS G12-Mutant Tumors DOI

金蓉 郑

World Journal of Cancer Research, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 15(02), P. 77 - 89

Published: Jan. 1, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Anlotinib enhances the efficacy of KRAS-G12C inhibitors through c-Myc/ORC2 axis inhibition in non-small cell lung cancer DOI Creative Commons
Hongyu Liu, Chao Zhou, Jun Lü

et al.

Cell Death and Disease, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 16(1)

Published: May 2, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Emerging biomarkers for pancreatic cancer: from early detection to personalized therapy DOI

M. Jamal,

Pratyush Porel,

Khadga Raj Aran

et al.

Clinical & Translational Oncology, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: May 10, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Development and Performance Evaluation of a Magnetic Self-Assembled Electrochemical Biosensor Based on α-Fe2O3/Fe3O4 Heterogeneous Nanorods for Supersensitive Detection of KRAS DOI
Qingxiang Wang, Hezhong Ouyang, Wentao Li

et al.

Colloids and Surfaces A Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 136624 - 136624

Published: March 1, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0