A scoping review of integrated arts therapies and neuroscience research DOI Creative Commons
Rebecca Bokoch, Noah Hass‐Cohen, Andreas Espinoza

et al.

Frontiers in Psychology, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 16

Published: May 8, 2025

Introduction This article provided a scoping review of the current state field for integrated arts therapies and neuroscience research. The main modalities included in this were: (i.e., drawing, painting, sculpting, bibliotherapy, cinema therapy, dance movement therapies, drama music neuroaesthetics, phototherapies, poetry). objectives were to: (1) include multiple (2) summarize, synthesize, compare, contrast populations, settings, presenting problems, methods, modalities, measures, outcomes, (3) discuss implications, (4) suggest future directions. Methods design was conducted according to PRISMA-ScR JBI Scoping Review Manual standardized recommendations. Eligibility criteria included: English language, peer-review, integration neuroscience, use research methodologies such as case studies, quantitative, qualitative, mixed systematic or reviews, meta-analyses. Articles gathered from two online databases (EBSCOHost PubMed) using keywords, articles reference lists. Publications that met reviewed charted following information: author, year publication, sample size characteristics, design, data analyses, modality intervention, treatment), outcomes. 84 publications inclusion criteria, after team discussed consensus. Results Outcomes suggested improvements brain activity integration, cognitive, affective, sensory, social functioning, memory reconsolidation, psychological symptoms, affect, behavior. Discussion Interpretations limited most lacked directionality their approach, exploratory, dependent on researcher assumptions, expertise, access instruments populations. Therefore, more is needed each upholds stronger methodology, can develop focus across researchers. While able summarize synthesize field, it still too early be compare outcomes make solid conclusions about specific neuroscientific processes benefits individual modality. body knowledge valuable implications made suggestions

Language: Английский

Neuroscience-based relational art therapy and deep brain reorienting in the treatment of dissociative identity disorder DOI Creative Commons
Anna Gerge, Gabriella Rudstam, Hans Peter Söndergaard

et al.

Frontiers in Psychology, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 16

Published: Feb. 28, 2025

Art therapy (AT) has been proposed as a treatment for post-traumatic conditions, potentially by providing somatic sensory input that can (i) enhance the client’s sense of self and embodiment, (ii) modulate arousal, (iii) aid in rethinking reframing traumatic memories. However, evidence supporting AT dissociative disorders remains limited. The theoretical basis efficacy is discussed relation to findings regarding traumatized person’s brain mindset, well its altered functional network connectivity. It crucial consider specific alterations networks associated with trauma, particularly those occurring deep regions, which include midbrain, brainstem, cerebellum. hypothesis suggests early or severe trauma impair brain’s higher regulatory functions, explained cascade theory. This theory explains how diverse activation patterns within midbrain’s periaqueductal gray (PAG) midbrain influence limbic system cortices, thereby modulating states being behavior. Phase-specific, resource-oriented, long-term complexly individuals benefit from novel insights neuroimaging studies inform therapeutic methods. illustrated clinical vignette client diagnosed identity disorder (DID), where reorienting (DBR) was combined relational AT. component hypothesized have facilitated grounding present moment enhanced access her neurophenomenological self. Moreover, changes may occurred at implicit non-verbal levels. DBR believed helped remain previously avoided unbearable internal experience. To validate these assumptions, second author conducted semi-structured interview focused on experiences psychotherapy , including effect when introduced after were articulated through thematic analysis interview, yielded following themes: Loneliness, getting help moving towards togetherness . Further research development methods neuroplasticity necessary highly clients change heal are recommended.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
A scoping review of integrated arts therapies and neuroscience research DOI Creative Commons
Rebecca Bokoch, Noah Hass‐Cohen, Andreas Espinoza

et al.

Frontiers in Psychology, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 16

Published: May 8, 2025

Introduction This article provided a scoping review of the current state field for integrated arts therapies and neuroscience research. The main modalities included in this were: (i.e., drawing, painting, sculpting, bibliotherapy, cinema therapy, dance movement therapies, drama music neuroaesthetics, phototherapies, poetry). objectives were to: (1) include multiple (2) summarize, synthesize, compare, contrast populations, settings, presenting problems, methods, modalities, measures, outcomes, (3) discuss implications, (4) suggest future directions. Methods design was conducted according to PRISMA-ScR JBI Scoping Review Manual standardized recommendations. Eligibility criteria included: English language, peer-review, integration neuroscience, use research methodologies such as case studies, quantitative, qualitative, mixed systematic or reviews, meta-analyses. Articles gathered from two online databases (EBSCOHost PubMed) using keywords, articles reference lists. Publications that met reviewed charted following information: author, year publication, sample size characteristics, design, data analyses, modality intervention, treatment), outcomes. 84 publications inclusion criteria, after team discussed consensus. Results Outcomes suggested improvements brain activity integration, cognitive, affective, sensory, social functioning, memory reconsolidation, psychological symptoms, affect, behavior. Discussion Interpretations limited most lacked directionality their approach, exploratory, dependent on researcher assumptions, expertise, access instruments populations. Therefore, more is needed each upholds stronger methodology, can develop focus across researchers. While able summarize synthesize field, it still too early be compare outcomes make solid conclusions about specific neuroscientific processes benefits individual modality. body knowledge valuable implications made suggestions

Language: Английский

Citations

0