BACKGROUND
Chronic
or
persistent
pain
affects
one’s
ability
to
work
be
productive
at
work,
generating
high
societal
and
economic
burden.
However,
the
provision
of
work-related
advice
support
for
people
with
chronic
is
variable
lacking.
The
Pain-at-Work
(PAW)
Toolkit
was
cocreated
who
live
pain,
health
care
professionals,
employers.
It
aims
increase
knowledge
about
employee
rights
how
access
managing
a
painful
condition
in
workplace
provides
on
lifestyle
behaviors
that
facilitate
management
pain.
OBJECTIVE
We
aimed
establish
feasibility
conducting
definitive
cluster
randomized
controlled
trial
comparing
PAW
telephone
calls
from
an
occupational
therapist
treatment
as
usual
(ie,
standard
their
employer).
Our
primary
outcomes
are
establishing
parameters
feasibility,
acceptability,
usability,
safety
this
digital
intervention.
will
assess
candidate
secondary
outcomes’
test
research
processes
trial.
METHODS
This
open-label,
parallel
2-arm
pragmatic
exploratory
economics
analysis
nested
qualitative
interview
study.
aim
recruit
120
participants
least
8
clusters
(any
type,
>10
employees)
England.
recruitment
workplaces
occurs
via
personal
approach,
individual
web
based.
Eligible
vocationally
active
adults
aged
≥18
years
internet
self-reporting
interfering
undertake
enjoy
work.
A
restricted
1:1
cluster-level
randomization
used
allocate
employment
settings
usual;
unblinded
group
allocation.
Following
site-
individual-level
consent,
complete
web-based
baseline
survey
(time
0),
including
measures
capacity,
well-being,
resource
use.
Follow-up
performed
3
months
1)
6
2).
Feasibility
relate
recruitment;
intervention
fidelity
(eg,
delivery,
reach,
uptake,
engagement);
retention;
follow-up.
Qualitative
evaluation
2)
mapped
Capability,
Opportunity,
Motivation–Behavior
model
explore
acceptability
employees
employers,
along
contextual
factors
influencing
delivery
uptake
RESULTS
Ethics
approval
obtained
March
2023.
Trial
began
June
CONCLUSIONS
first
evidence-based
supporting
self-management
study
inform
design
trial,
sample
size
estimation,
approaches
site
identification,
selection,
final
model.
Findings
future
CLINICALTRIAL
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT05838677;
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05838677
INTERNATIONAL
REGISTERED
REPORT
DERR1-10.2196/51474
Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
17(2), P. e1847 - e1847
Published: July 1, 2023
El
contenido
del
título
de
este
número
especial
es
suficientemente
descriptivo
lo
que
se
espera:
un
enfoque
en
instrumentación
y
prácticas
evaluación
educativa
psicológica
el
contexto
la
educación
superior.
La
psicoeducativa
generalmente
entendida
como
una
acción
integral
enfocado
específico
educación,
con
fin
último
crear
intervenciones
empatadas
las
necesidades
los
estudiantes
(Isaacs
et
al.,
2013).
Sin
embargo,
procesos
superior,
también
incluyen
aspectos
van
desde
proceso
admisión,
para
continuar
ciclo
vida
estudiantil
(Halpern
&
Butler,
Y
temáticamente,
general,
superior
particular,
no
puede
entenderse
únicamente
conjunto
manuscritos
desarrollo
adaptación
medidas.
BACKGROUND
Chronic
or
persistent
pain
affects
one’s
ability
to
work
be
productive
at
work,
generating
high
societal
and
economic
burden.
However,
the
provision
of
work-related
advice
support
for
people
with
chronic
is
variable
lacking.
The
Pain-at-Work
(PAW)
Toolkit
was
cocreated
who
live
pain,
health
care
professionals,
employers.
It
aims
increase
knowledge
about
employee
rights
how
access
managing
a
painful
condition
in
workplace
provides
on
lifestyle
behaviors
that
facilitate
management
pain.
OBJECTIVE
We
aimed
establish
feasibility
conducting
definitive
cluster
randomized
controlled
trial
comparing
PAW
telephone
calls
from
an
occupational
therapist
treatment
as
usual
(ie,
standard
their
employer).
Our
primary
outcomes
are
establishing
parameters
feasibility,
acceptability,
usability,
safety
this
digital
intervention.
will
assess
candidate
secondary
outcomes’
test
research
processes
trial.
METHODS
This
open-label,
parallel
2-arm
pragmatic
exploratory
economics
analysis
nested
qualitative
interview
study.
aim
recruit
120
participants
least
8
clusters
(any
type,
>10
employees)
England.
recruitment
workplaces
occurs
via
personal
approach,
individual
web
based.
Eligible
vocationally
active
adults
aged
≥18
years
internet
self-reporting
interfering
undertake
enjoy
work.
A
restricted
1:1
cluster-level
randomization
used
allocate
employment
settings
usual;
unblinded
group
allocation.
Following
site-
individual-level
consent,
complete
web-based
baseline
survey
(time
0),
including
measures
capacity,
well-being,
resource
use.
Follow-up
performed
3
months
1)
6
2).
Feasibility
relate
recruitment;
intervention
fidelity
(eg,
delivery,
reach,
uptake,
engagement);
retention;
follow-up.
Qualitative
evaluation
2)
mapped
Capability,
Opportunity,
Motivation–Behavior
model
explore
acceptability
employees
employers,
along
contextual
factors
influencing
delivery
uptake
RESULTS
Ethics
approval
obtained
March
2023.
Trial
began
June
CONCLUSIONS
first
evidence-based
supporting
self-management
study
inform
design
trial,
sample
size
estimation,
approaches
site
identification,
selection,
final
model.
Findings
future
CLINICALTRIAL
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT05838677;
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05838677
INTERNATIONAL
REGISTERED
REPORT
DERR1-10.2196/51474