Cutting-edge AI tools revolutionizing scientific research in life sciences DOI Creative Commons

Katarzyna Lorenc-Kukula

BioTechnologia, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: March 7, 2025

Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming a transformative force in the life sciences, pushing boundaries of possibility. Imagine AI automating time-consuming tasks, uncovering hidden patterns vast datasets, designing proteins minutes instead years, and even predicting disease outbreaks before they occur. This review explores latest tools revolutionizing scientific fields, including research data analysis, healthcare, supporting writing. Beyond processing, reshaping how scientists draft share their findings, enhancing processes ranging from literature reviews to citation management. However, with great power comes responsibility. Are we prepared for this leap? delves into forefront where innovation meets

Language: Английский

Off-the-Shelf Large Language Models for Causality Assessment of Individual Case Safety Reports: A Proof-of-Concept with COVID-19 Vaccines DOI Creative Commons
Andrea Abate,

Elisa Poncato,

María Antonietta Barbieri

et al.

Drug Safety, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: March 12, 2025

This study evaluated the feasibility of ChatGPT and Gemini, two off-the-shelf large language models (LLMs), to automate causality assessments, focusing on Adverse Events Following Immunizations (AEFIs) myocarditis pericarditis related COVID-19 vaccines. We assessed 150 COVID-19-related cases reported Vaccine Event Reporting System (VAERS) in United States America (USA). Both LLMs human experts conducted World Health Organization (WHO) algorithm for vaccine inter-rater agreement was measured using percentage agreement. Adherence WHO by comparing LLM responses expected sequence algorithm. Statistical analyses, including descriptive statistics Random Forest modeling, explored case complexity (e.g., string length measurements) factors affecting performance adherence. showed higher adherence (34%) compared Gemini (7%) had moderate (71%) with experts, whereas fair (53%). often failed recognize listed AEFIs, incorrectly identifying 6.7% 13.3% respectively. inconsistencies 8.0% 46.7%. For ChatGPT, associated lower prompt sections. The random forest analysis achieved an accuracy 55% (95% confidence interval: 35.7–73.5) predicting ChatGPT. Notable limitations have been identified their use aiding assessments safety. performed better, experts. In investigated scenario, both are better suited as complementary tools expertise.

Language: Английский

Citations

1

Cutting-edge AI tools revolutionizing scientific research in life sciences DOI Creative Commons

Katarzyna Lorenc-Kukula

BioTechnologia, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: March 7, 2025

Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming a transformative force in the life sciences, pushing boundaries of possibility. Imagine AI automating time-consuming tasks, uncovering hidden patterns vast datasets, designing proteins minutes instead years, and even predicting disease outbreaks before they occur. This review explores latest tools revolutionizing scientific fields, including research data analysis, healthcare, supporting writing. Beyond processing, reshaping how scientists draft share their findings, enhancing processes ranging from literature reviews to citation management. However, with great power comes responsibility. Are we prepared for this leap? delves into forefront where innovation meets

Language: Английский

Citations

0