The US health-care paradox: lifting the veil DOI
Zhenjun Gao,

Stefanie J Hollenbach

The Lancet, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 404(10469), P. 2244 - 2246

Published: Dec. 1, 2024

Language: Английский

Current Reproductive Health Policy and Outcomes in the United States DOI
Carly M. Dahl, Cara Heuser

Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Feb. 1, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0

A review of the changing landscape of vasectomy trends in the United States in the post-dobbs era DOI Creative Commons
Brittany Berk, Raevti Bole, Scott D. Lundy

et al.

International Journal of Impotence Research, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: April 4, 2025

Abstract The United States (U.S.) Supreme Court declared abortion unconstitutional in June 2022 the Dobbs v. Women’s Health Organization hearing. This decision sent shockwaves through political and medical community. While immediate impact on female reproductive rights was readily apparent, male counterparts also sought to assert their autonomy as evidenced by rapid rise vasectomy interest across country. In months following decision, rates of interest, measured Google Search Trends, procedure were noted be increasing review aims summarize current literature surrounding trends with particular focus various geographic regions different age groups marital status. To date, five studies have been published exploring public vasectomy, internet search trends, consultation post- , including three primary single-center studies, one study has regarding social media themes U.S. These data highlight decisions healthcare males this country, placing vasectomists at heart discussion.

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Anesthesia for reproductive healthcare from start to finish: A narrative review DOI
Christine P. McKenzie,

Jessica Ansari,

Lawrence C. Tsen

et al.

International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 104364 - 104364

Published: April 1, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Are state abortion bans an occupational health hazard for obstetrician-gynaecologists? Findings from a multistate qualitative study DOI
Erika L. Sabbath, Samantha M. McKetchnie, Kavita Shah Arora

et al.

Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 81(10), P. 493 - 497

Published: Oct. 1, 2024

Objectives Since the US Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. Jackson decision, 17 states have imposed near-total abortion bans. These bans may negatively impact health and well-being of obstetrician-gynaecologists (OB-GYNs), due to high levels work-related stress that laws created for them. The goal present study is evaluate impacts post-Dobbs state on occupational OB-GYNs. Methods Study OB-GYNs in Post-Roe America a qualitative 54 practising 13 14 with as March 2023. Using volunteer sampling methods, participants were recruited semistructured interviews via videoconference from August Results Thematic analysis interview transcripts identified six major domains OB-GYNs: anxiety depression, burden negative emotions, burn-out, coping-related behaviours, sleep disruption personal relationships. Conclusions State following 2022 decision not only pregnant patients but also their providers. provider include mental burn-out extend physical outcomes work–life interface.

Language: Английский

Citations

2

From the Editor—Social Work Education Post-2024 Election: Considerations and Opportunities DOI
Danielle E. Parrish

Journal of Social Work Education, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 60(4), P. 483 - 488

Published: Oct. 1, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

1

Providers’ Perceptions of Barriers to Respectful Maternity Care at Massachusetts General Hospital DOI Open Access

Katherine Doughty Fachon,

Samantha Truong,

Sahana Narayan

et al.

Published: Aug. 27, 2024

Background/Objectives: Disrespectful care during childbirth has been observed as a global issue and factor influencing maternal morbidity mortality. While the United States experienced worsening rates of mortality, perceptions respectful maternity have understudied. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted Boston from April 2023 to January 2024 among 46 labor delivery physicians, midwives, nurses at Massachusetts General Hospital. The survey evaluated their observation disrespectful care, performance stress support factors respectfulness care. Results: most reported behaviors were dismissing patients’ pain (87.0%), discriminatory based on physical characteristics (67.4%) race (65.2%), uncomfortable vaginal examinations (65.2%). Respondents self-reported very high levels performance. Reported barriers included workload (76.1%) fatigue (60.9%). Conclusions: in is an by health providers. Implicit bias working conditions providers are This information can be used strategize future training other areas intervention improve

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Abortion Law Changes and Occupational Therapy Practice in the United States DOI

Darya Nemati,

Delaney Suzanne McKee,

Emily F. Rothman

et al.

American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 78(6)

Published: Oct. 9, 2024

The U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, changing access to abortion many states. impact of these changes on occupational therapy practice has not yet been explored through empirical research.

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Empowering Reproductive Healthcare: Reflections and Calls to Action From the 2024 American Society of Reproductive Immunology (ASRI) Meeting Policy Advocacy Session DOI
Anna Powell, Jessica Weng,

Brittany R. Jones

et al.

American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 92(4)

Published: Oct. 1, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Providers’ Perceptions of Respectful and Disrespectful Maternity Care at Massachusetts General Hospital DOI Creative Commons

Katherine Doughty Fachon,

Samantha Truong,

Sahana Narayan

et al.

Reproductive Medicine, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 5(4), P. 231 - 242

Published: Oct. 18, 2024

Background/Objectives: Disrespectful care of birthing persons during childbirth has been observed as a global issue and possible factor influencing maternal morbidity mortality. While persons’ experiences mistreatment in have examined, perceptions from obstetrical providers respectful maternity understudied. Methods: A mixed-method cross-sectional study was conducted Boston April 2023 to January 2024 among 46 labor delivery physicians, midwives, nurses at Massachusetts General Hospital. The survey evaluated their observation disrespectful care, the performance stress support factors respectfulness care. Results: most reported behaviors were dismissing patients’ pain (87.0%), discriminatory based on physical characteristics (67.4%) race (65.2%), uncomfortable vaginal examinations (65.2%). Respondents self-reported very high levels performance. Reported barriers included workload (76.1%) fatigue (60.9%). Conclusions: is an by healthcare providers. Implicit bias working conditions health are This information can be used strategize future training other areas intervention improve

Language: Английский

Citations

0

“I am putting my fear on them subconsciously”: a qualitative study of contraceptive care in the context of abortion bans in the U.S. DOI Creative Commons
Yasaman Zia,

Erica Somerson,

Connie Folse

et al.

Reproductive Health, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 21(1)

Published: Nov. 24, 2024

Abstract Background Since the Dobbs vs. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision in June 2022, providers throughout U.S. have been navigating shifting legal landscape of abortion bans, which diminish delivery evidence-based healthcare. The Dobb s has had a detrimental impact on medical training, physician–patient relationship, and provision care. However, few studies captured effects adjacent fields, including contraceptive Our objective was to examine Methods We conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews (August 2022–July 2024), with 41 healthcare across US, majority (63%) restrictive states. utilized deductive thematic analysis assess providers’ practice changes experiences related services. Results In reaction decision, noted increased requests for contraception, especially highly effective methods. Providers worried that certain methods, such as IUDs or emergency would become restricted, mentioned advance pills other ways they try ensure supplies. also discussed their patients were about threats adolescents. Some expressed concern, however, bans may prompt overemphasize high-efficacy methods directive counseling. shared it stressful contexts uncertainty, policies affecting care, emergent needs providing services out-of-state before go home. Several felt an importance role communities, deepened commitment advocate patients. Conclusions Abortion restrictions profoundly counseling clinical practices underscore providers' legally precarious position today’s reproductive health landscape. Attention access person-centered care salient public need long-term impacts limited rights stretch already under-resourced system further emphasize moral pressures.

Language: Английский

Citations

0