Operational and organizational variation in determinants of policy implementation success: the case of policies that earmark taxes for behavioral health services DOI Creative Commons
Jonathan Purtle, Nicole A. Stadnick, Amanda I. Mauri

et al.

Implementation Science, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 19(1)

Published: Oct. 31, 2024

Research on determinants of health policy implementation is limited, and conceptualizations evidence success are evolving in the field. This study aimed to identify perceived assess whether these vary according to: (1) how operationally defined [i.e., broadly vs. narrowly related evidence-based practice (EBP) reach] (2) role a person's organization implementation. The focuses policies that earmark taxes for behavioral services.

Language: Английский

A Mixed‐Methods Exploration of the Implementation of Policies That Earmarked Taxes for Behavioral Health DOI Open Access
Nicole A. Stadnick, Carrie M. Geremia, Amanda I. Mauri

et al.

Milbank Quarterly, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 102(4), P. 913 - 943

Published: Sept. 6, 2024

Policy Points Earmarked tax policies for behavioral health are perceived as having positive impacts related to increasing flexible funding, suggesting benefits expand this financing approach. Implementation challenges these earmarked taxes included base volatility that impedes long‐term service delivery planning and inequities in the distribution of revenue. Recommendations designing or revising include developing clear guidelines support systems manage administrative aspects programs, cocreating reporting oversight structures with system agents, selecting revenue streams relatively stable across years. Context Over 200 cities counties United States have implemented earmarking services. This mixed‐methods study was conducted aim characterizing perceptions policies, strengths weaknesses policy designs, factors influence decision making about how is allocated Methods Study data came from surveys completed by 274 officials involved implementation 37 interviews a sample jurisdictions taxes—California ( n = 16), Washington 12), Colorado 6), Iowa 3). Interviews primarily explored advantages drawbacks tax, design, influencing decisions allocation. Findings A total 83% respondents strongly agreed it better than not, 73.2% increased flexibility address complex needs, 65.1% number people served evidence‐based practices. Only 43.3%, however, easy satisfy tax‐reporting requirements. revealed enabled funding services supports, such training practices, supplemented mainstream sources (e.g., Medicaid). However, some interviewees also reported revenue, and, cases, administratively burdensome reporting. Decisions allocation were influenced goals reducing care inequities, being responsive community addressing constraints sources, lesser degree, supporting considered be evidence based. Conclusions promising strategy improve access to, quality of, supplementing state federal financing.

Language: Английский

Citations

1

Public and political acceptability of a food tax shift – An experiment with policy framing and revenue use DOI Creative Commons
Emma Ejelöv, Jonas Nässén, Simon Matti

et al.

Food Policy, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 130, P. 102772 - 102772

Published: Dec. 5, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

1

Operational and organizational variation in determinants of policy implementation success: the case of policies that earmark taxes for behavioral health services DOI Creative Commons
Jonathan Purtle, Nicole A. Stadnick, Amanda I. Mauri

et al.

Implementation Science, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 19(1)

Published: Oct. 31, 2024

Research on determinants of health policy implementation is limited, and conceptualizations evidence success are evolving in the field. This study aimed to identify perceived assess whether these vary according to: (1) how operationally defined [i.e., broadly vs. narrowly related evidence-based practice (EBP) reach] (2) role a person's organization implementation. The focuses policies that earmark taxes for behavioral services.

Language: Английский

Citations

0