Establishing an Evidence-Based System for Cosmetic Safety and Efficacy Evaluation
Ye Li,
No information about this author
Jianhua Zhang,
No information about this author
Tian Chen
No information about this author
et al.
IntechOpen eBooks,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Jan. 31, 2025
In
the
era
of
booming
cosmetics
industry,
safety
and
efficacy
evaluation
have
become
crucial
aspects
in
ensuring
product
quality
meeting
consumer
demands.
The
Chinese
market
has
witnessed
rapid
development.
With
an
increasing
emphasis
on
cosmetics,
a
relatively
comprehensive
system
been
gradually
established.
As
pioneers
Europe
United
States
also
possess
mature
advanced
experience
this
regard.
Based
years
work
fields
related
to
evaluation,
author
chapter
summarized
characteristics
China,
Europe,
area.
For
entry
points
include
raw
materials,
packaging
chemistry
microbiology,
as
well
human
testing.
it
is
classified
into
categories
such
for
freckle—removing
whitening,
anti-hair
loss,
sun
protection,
anti-aging,
acne—treatment,
repair,
soothing,
those
suitable
sensitive
skin.
By
integrating
application
new
AI
technologies,
presents
scientific
evidence-based
boost
high-quality
development
industry.
Language: Английский
The Role of Evidence-Based Dentistry in Prosthodontics
Analia Veitz‐Keenan
No information about this author
Dental Clinics of North America,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
69(2), P. 145 - 153
Published: Jan. 31, 2025
Language: Английский
What Are Patients’ Perceptions and Attitudes Regarding the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Skin Cancer Screening and Diagnosis? Narrative Review
Journal of Investigative Dermatology,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Feb. 1, 2025
Language: Английский
Healthcare leaders’ perceptions of the contribution of artificial intelligence to person-centred care: An interview study
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: March 4, 2025
The
aim
of
this
study
was
to
explore
healthcare
leaders'
perceptions
the
contribution
artificial
intelligence
(AI)
person-centred
care
(PCC).
had
an
explorative
qualitative
approach.
Individual
interviews
were
conducted
from
October
2020
May
2021
with
26
leaders
in
a
county
council
Sweden.
An
abductive
content
analysis
based
on
McCormack
and
McCance's
framework
PCC.
four
constructs
(i.e.
prerequisites,
environment,
processes
expected
outcomes)
constituted
categories
for
deductive
analysis.
inductive
generated
11
subcategories
constructs,
representing
how
AI
could
contribute
Healthcare
perceived
that
applications
PCC
through
(a)
supporting
professional
competence
establishing
trust
among
professionals
patients
(prerequisites);
(b)
including
AI's
ability
facilitate
patient
safety,
enable
proactive
care,
provide
treatment
recommendations
prioritise
resources
(the
environment);
(c)
tailor
information
promote
process
shared
decision
making
self-management
(person-centred
processes);
(d)
improving
quality
promoting
health
outcomes
(expected
outcomes).
at
different
levels
healthcare,
thereby
enhancing
patients'
health.
Language: Английский
A critical look into artificial intelligence and healthcare disparities
D Li,
No information about this author
Shruti Parikh,
No information about this author
Ana Costa
No information about this author
et al.
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
8
Published: March 6, 2025
Artificial
intelligence
(AI)
has
permeated
many
aspects
of
daily
life,
including
medicine,
in
recent
years.
As
2021,
343
AI-enabled
medical
devices
had
been
approved
by
the
United
States
Food
and
Drug
Administration,
with
more
development
(1).
Most
notable
thus
far
AI's
ability
to
assist
every
step
radiology
workflow:
it
can
determine
appropriateness
imaging,
recommend
most
appropriate
imaging
exam,
predict
wait
times
or
appointment
delays,
interpret
much
potential
utilizations
(2).
The
World
Health
Organization
proposed
that
AI
tools
be
integrated
into
healthcare
improve
efficiency
achieve
sustainable
health-related
(3).
reduce
costs
administrative
burdens,
waiting
for
patients
receive
care,
diagnostic
abilities
patient
facilitate
data
management,
expedite
discovery
(4,5).However,
advancement
comes
unique
drawbacks.
For
example,
security
privacy
are
at
risk
must
improved,
as
may
readily
unknowingly
provide
consent
covert
collection
methods
(6,7).
Use
seriously
reconsidered
if
poses
a
confidentiality,
non-negotiable
healthcare.
With
rapidly
gather
analyze
large
amounts
data,
controlling
scope
its
use
becomes
challenge:
these
progress
collect
disclose
without
direct
investigator
oversight
(5).
In
addition,
healthcare-based
research
conducted
non-clinical
settings,
rolling
out
certain
clinical
settings
result
non-evidence-based
practice
(6).
clinicians
feel
tempted
tasks
beyond
their
validation,
training
not
adequately
represent
scenarios
encounter
(8).
fact,
studies
on
have
administered
(5).That
is
say
should
used
It
does,
however,
require
immense
consideration
how
designed
why
utilized.
Some
contended
goal
developing
minimize
health
disparities
make
system
equitable
(1,9).
Yet,
characteristics
this
difficult
achieve.
such,
there
growing
body
literature
discusses
role
both
closing
perpetuating
inequalities
(10)(11)(12).
directly
proportional
quality
sets
used,
authors
addressed
concerns
regarding
bias
datasets
lack
diversity
teams
ultimately
resulting
AI-driven
care
(5,(13)(14)(15).
This
article
draws
from
existing
add
ongoing
conversation
about
implications
disparities.
Specifically,
we
discuss
economic
implications,
explainability
systems,
importance
compassionate
care.
Ultimately,
while
indeed
confer
benefits
system,
remains
may,
instead,
backfire.One
essential
any
kind
social
disparity
economics.
notorious
having
highest
expenditure
globally,
costing
$3.5
trillion,
17.9%
Gross
Domestic
Product
(16).
Any
measure
decrease
burden
-either
US
internationally
-may
attractive.
save
billions
annual
(17).
greatly
streamline
workflow,
even
tasks.
An
automated
alleviate
burdens
such
scheduling
patients,
estimating
times,
billing
insurance
companies
(2,17,18).
Such
workflow
optimization
cost
delivery
cutting
intermediaries
typically
handle
mundane
turn,
patients'
financial
responsibility
related
reduced.On
side,
screen
diagnose
conditions,
stratify
disease
risk,
devise
treatment
plans
significantly
errors
factors
associated
adverse
outcomes
(4).
Eventually,
technology
advances,
perform
procedures,
given
deemed
ethical,
safe
evidence-based.
While
seem
like
simply
perk
those
practicing
physician-rich
areas,
they
could
become
indispensable
areas
affected
shortages
professionals
(19).
Urban
rural
communities
bear
brunt
inequity,
struggling
access
primary
specialty
(20).
estimated
2030,
shortage
up
104,900
physicians
implementation
underserved
populations
help
challenges
Furthermore,
assistants
physician
burnout
therefore
(21).These
advantages
conferred
only
proper
development,
installation
maintenance
systems.
requires
investment.
One
model
an
glaucoma
screening
tool
Changjiang
county
China
fifteen-year
accumulated
incremental
using
was
$434,903.20
approximately
2000
(22).
arguably
worth
early
detection
reduced
progression,
impractical
roll
larger
populations.
institutions
wealthy
countries
easily
But
what
countries?
Community
hospitals
limited
government
funding?
Practices
less
purchasing
power?
Even
analyses
demonstrate
saved
long
run,
upfront
investment
too
obstacle
(16).Once
developed,
purchased,
installed,
another
issue.Software
updates,
advanced
computing
technologies,
ever-increasing
cloud
storage
requirements
evolving
cybersecurity
needs
protect
information
create
further
barriers
widespread
application
(23).
These
all-around
nuanced
than
mere
implement
practice.
Inevitably,
algorithms
higher
lower
levels
sophistication,
infrastructures
robust,
measures
stronger
weaker.
choose
will
closely
tied
status.
Of
course,
then
leave
behind
under-resourced
communities.Currently,
"explainable"
play
decision
making
(24).
other
words
-exactly
do
technologies
work?
How
decisions?
questions
developers
themselves
cannot
answer;
know
work,
yet
nobody
fully
explain
how.
"black
box"
holds
important
worldwide.
Machine
learning
(ML)
component
which
involves
based
(25).
Detecting
correcting
biases
ethical
prerequisite
justice
AI-and
ML-based
decision-making
words,
explainable
enables
identify
correct
set-based
currently
skew
(10,13).The
discussion
additional
considerations.
Explainable
models
keep
accountable
accountability
precedes
error
concern
compounded
fact
who
literate
likely
ask
seek
(26).
Since
prepared
participate
shared
making,
challenge
questionable
decisions
(27).AI
treated
support
decision-making,
one
independently.
prescription
systems
developed
aid
prevent
human
(28,29).
recommendation
conflicts
judgement.
arise
trained
treat,
thereby
generating
recommendations
poorly
aligned
realities
particularly
relevant
minority
historically
under-studied
(15).
Healthcare
providers
critically
assess
context
experience
preferences.
Institutions
establish
clear
policies
accept
reject
suggestions
maintain
care.Justice
also
transparent
foster
trust
system.
Unexplainable,
opaque
models,
hand,
exacerbate
mistrust
already
pervades
prevalent
socially
economically
marginalized
(30).
A
key
underprivileged
patient's
comfort
physicians'
personal
involvement
(31).
see
unexplainable
black
box
ML
-if
handled
correctly
-would
certainly
concerns.
Lack
explanation
impersonal,
alienate
vulnerable
population
widen
disparities.Even
elucidate
box,
ever
replace
physician-patient
relationship
delivering
empathic
care?
Currently,
seems
unlikely
-one
study
demonstrated
chatbots
empathetic
sympathetic
responses
lowered
perception
authenticity
(32).
contrast,
empathy
sympathy
expressed
did
induce
negative
effect
perceived
undermine
subjective
satisfaction
but
objectively
worsen
outcomes.
some
provided
sound
biomedical
diabetes
overlooked
psychosocial
components
necessary
glycemic
control
(33).
Algorithms
A1c
goals,
calculate
medication
dosages,
send
prescriptions
optimize
However,
tailored
disproportionately
affect
greater
barriers.
Continuing
stand-alone
case
diabetes,
significant
include
afford
healthy
food,
free
time
follow-up
visits
literacy
understand
(34).
Now
combine
slew
medications,
unemployment
ailing
family
member.
Surely,
manage
countless
different
ways.
There
no
path.
Regardless,
imperative
-human
AI-based
-address
compassion.Palliative
emphasizes
relieving
suffering
optimizing
life
end-oflife
field
compassion
(35).
risks
depersonalizing
cases
lacking
when
families
need
most.
Death
dying
often
rooted
culture,
beliefs,
spirituality.
deeply
each
Whereas
encourage
open
communication
death,
others
uncomfortable
it;
whereas
value
life-prolonging
regardless
prognosis,
so
(36).
Palliative
imposing
"one-size-fits-all"
aWestern
dataset
Once
again,
understudied
cultural
minorities
fall
"understanding"
-or
thereof
-of
values.Society
large,
regulators,
policy
makers,
companies,
carefully
consider
incorporating
practices
business
medicine.
Regulators
raised
over
regulation
well
generalizability
(37).
Another
area
several
stakeholders
regulators
legal
fear
exists
scenario
made
conversely
accusations
negligent
AI.
Physicians
were
neither
nor
agreed
assuming
AI,
believed
liable
since
medicine
Each
side
felt
understood
"part
whole"
highlighting
Appropriate
makers
needed
ensure
promote
mitigated
informing
involved
(38).Certain
narratives
pitted
rival
skills
education
physicians,
claims
day
(38).
solely
setting
final
being
human.
Rhetoric
continues
pit
against
hinder
incorporation
Patients
benefit
replacing
avoiding
altogether.In
discussing
disparities,
low-and
middle-income
(LMICs).
where
resources
personnel
scarce,
workload
(39).
especially
available
(40).
Disease
outbreaks
predicted
earlier
allow
mobilization
areas.
severity
failure
illnesses
malaria,
tuberculosis
dengue
fever
LMICs
face
implementing
electronic
records
limiting
factor
input
high
income
(HICs)
reflect
When
applying
LMICs,
updated
applied
to.
Failure
reinforce
(40).Gaining
integration
problem
future.
small
interviewing
perspectives
GP,
subjects
mixed
feelings
(41).
common
amongst
participants
sharing
wanted
assurance
would
obtained
prior
anonymization
used.
survey
203
public
opinion
yielded
results,
near
50/50
split
asked
physician's
diagnosing
conditions
(42).
same
study,
majority
trusted
culturally
biased
decision.
positive
outlook
towards
future
25%
respondents
believe
next
10
years
nearly
half
50
(42).Similarly,
lacks
intelligence,
rather
wisdom
-the
sense
intuition
accumulate
(43).
Can
develop
time?
mimic
brain
synthesizing
decades'
making?
simple
cases,
can.
complex
story
-risks
intervention
weighed
complications
predicted,
all
easilydigestible
manner.
Yet
layer
nuance
added
shared-decision
introducednow,
desires
uncertainties
level
incorporate
recommendations.
Moreover,
remain
maker,
spend
meaningful
conversations
facilitating
(37,44).
alike.While
increase
bridge
gaps
healthcare,
inclusive
avoid
worsening
hinges
optimal
course
action,
execute
plan
appropriately.
Particularly
communities,
critical
process
building
maintaining
proved
absence
pose
success
delivery.
Both
alike
wish
standard
interaction.
Instead,
serve
adjunct
reducing
chance
error.
Collaboration
among
Language: Английский
Enhancing fieldwork readiness in occupational therapy students with generative AI
Tara Mansour,
No information about this author
John Wong
No information about this author
Frontiers in Medicine,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
11
Published: Oct. 16, 2024
The
rapid
integration
of
artificial
intelligence
(AI)
into
health
professions
education
is
revolutionizing
traditional
teaching
methodologies
and
enhancing
learning
experiences.
This
study
explores
the
use
generative
AI
to
aid
occupational
therapy
(OT)
students
in
intervention
planning.
OT
often
lack
background
knowledge
generate
a
wide
variety
interventions,
spending
excessive
time
on
idea
generation
rather
than
clinical
reasoning,
practice
skills,
patient
care.
can
enhance
creative
ideation
but
must
still
adhere
evidence-based
practice,
safety,
privacy
standards.
Students
used
ChatGPT
v.
3.5
lecture
assignment
integrate
analyzed
case
study,
generated
ideas
with
ChatGPT,
selected
interventions
that
aligned
client’s
needs,
provided
rationale.
They
conducted
searches
wrote
an
analysis
how
research
influenced
their
decisions.
results
demonstrate
AI’s
potential
as
valuable
tool
for
students,
comfort
understanding
ethical
safety
considerations.
Qualitative
feedback
highlighted
role
boosting
efficiency
creativity
planning,
most
expressing
strong
intent
due
its
ability
reduce
cognitive
load
innovative
ideas.
These
findings
suggest
integrating
curriculum
could
planning
improve
readiness.
Language: Английский