Deep Fertilization Is More Beneficial than Enhanced Efficiency Fertilizer on Crop Productivity and Environmental Cost: Evidence from a Global Meta-Analysis DOI Creative Commons
Qi Wu, Hua Huang,

Qinhe Wang

et al.

Agronomy, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 15(5), P. 1103 - 1103

Published: April 30, 2025

It is unclear whether enhanced efficiency fertilizer (EEF) or deep fertilization strategies (DF) can simultaneously improve crop productivity and reduce gaseous nitrogen losses. The DF strategy’s investment cost lower than that of EEF’s, with more potential for large-scale promotion. However, there still a need comprehensive comparison evaluation EEF’s effects on Here, we examine the EEF yield, use (NUE), nitrous oxide (N2O) ammonia (NH3) emissions by meta-analysis published studies. We collected peer-reviewed articles in recent decades conducted global meta-analysis, explored their responses to different climatic, field management practices, environmental factors. results showed compared urea application surface, significantly increased yields 7.52% 13.88% NUE 25.84% 36.27% reduced N2O 37.98% 34.18% NH3 42.37% 69.68%, respectively. strategy superior EEF. Due differences climatic factors, soil properties, improving loss vary. most cases, beneficial Compared EEF, yield 84.63% volatilization 64.47%, yield-scaled emission 13.32%, 60.23%. Therefore, emphasize achieve higher yields, utilization efficiency, nitrogen, which sustainable development agricultural ecosystems. research provide valuable information costs under an effective type management.

Language: Английский

ADUBAÇÃO VERDE: PRÁTICAS SUSTENTÁVEIS PARA O MELHORAMENTO DO SOLO DOI Creative Commons

Clara Victoria Furtado Zamignan,

Hianka Dias Silva Coelho Leite,

Isabelly Victoria Gomes Alves

et al.

Revista Multidisciplinar do Nordeste Mineiro, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 6(1), P. 1 - 14

Published: March 30, 2025

A adubação verde é uma prática sustentável que promove a conservação do solo e o aumento da fertilidade, utilizando plantas de cobertura para adição matéria orgânica nutrientes essenciais. O presente artigo, caráter revisionista, aborda os benefícios verde, incluindo orgânica, fixação biológica nitrogênio, melhoria estrutura controle erosão. Este artigo principais dessa técnica, como redução erosão, na retenção água, pragas invasoras, além diminuição lixiviação nutrientes. Também são discutidos impactos positivos no equilíbrio ecológico sustentabilidade agrícola, tornando estratégia fundamental sistemas produtivos mais resilientes eficientes. Conclui-se reduz necessidade insumos químicos, favorecendo pequenos agricultores, produção econômica sustentável. também contribui biodiversidade, criando habitats organismos benéficos, minhocas insetos polinizadores, ajudam melhorar saúde produtividade das culturas. Além disso, essa pode reduzir impacto ambiental causado pelo uso excessivo fertilizantes muitas vezes resultam contaminação corpos hídricos degradação solo. Com crescente demanda por práticas agrícolas sustentáveis, se torna ferramenta crucial agricultura regenerativa, promovendo recuperação solos degradados incentivando abordagem harmônica entre agrícola meio ambiente.

Citations

0
Enhancing sustainable sweet grass (Lippia dulcis L.) productivity and essential oil content using sunn hemp (Crotalaria juncea L.) as green manure DOI

R. Salomon,

Rafael Marlon Alves de Assis, João Pedro Miranda Rocha

et al.

Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 103593 - 103593

Published: April 1, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Deep Fertilization Is More Beneficial than Enhanced Efficiency Fertilizer on Crop Productivity and Environmental Cost: Evidence from a Global Meta-Analysis DOI Creative Commons
Qi Wu, Hua Huang,

Qinhe Wang

et al.

Agronomy, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 15(5), P. 1103 - 1103

Published: April 30, 2025

It is unclear whether enhanced efficiency fertilizer (EEF) or deep fertilization strategies (DF) can simultaneously improve crop productivity and reduce gaseous nitrogen losses. The DF strategy’s investment cost lower than that of EEF’s, with more potential for large-scale promotion. However, there still a need comprehensive comparison evaluation EEF’s effects on Here, we examine the EEF yield, use (NUE), nitrous oxide (N2O) ammonia (NH3) emissions by meta-analysis published studies. We collected peer-reviewed articles in recent decades conducted global meta-analysis, explored their responses to different climatic, field management practices, environmental factors. results showed compared urea application surface, significantly increased yields 7.52% 13.88% NUE 25.84% 36.27% reduced N2O 37.98% 34.18% NH3 42.37% 69.68%, respectively. strategy superior EEF. Due differences climatic factors, soil properties, improving loss vary. most cases, beneficial Compared EEF, yield 84.63% volatilization 64.47%, yield-scaled emission 13.32%, 60.23%. Therefore, emphasize achieve higher yields, utilization efficiency, nitrogen, which sustainable development agricultural ecosystems. research provide valuable information costs under an effective type management.

Language: Английский

Citations

0