Representations of human–elephant interactions on YouTube: Analyzing content and engagement to inform sustainable practices for wildlife tourism
Biological Conservation,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
308, P. 111240 - 111240
Published: May 10, 2025
Language: Английский
Continuing challenges of elephant captivity: the captive environment, health issues, and welfare implications
Catherine Doyle,
No information about this author
Heather Rally,
No information about this author
Lester O’Brien
No information about this author
et al.
PeerJ,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
12, P. e18161 - e18161
Published: Sept. 30, 2024
Although
the
well-being
of
elephants
in
captivity
is
paramount
importance,
confinement
these
long-lived,
highly
intelligent,
and
socially
complex
animals
continues
to
present
significant
challenges.
Here,
we
provide
an
overview
current
state
elephant
(primarily
West)
by
examining
captive
facilities,
improvements,
continuing
problems,
clinical/behavioral/neural
issues
that
remain.
Specifically,
examine
quantitative
qualitative
aspects
enclosed
space,
sociocognitive
factors,
dietary
differences,
health/welfare
concerns
(
e.g
.,
stereotypies,
physical
health,
nutrition,
reproduction,
life
expectancy).
The
challenges
environment
become
especially
salient
when
juxtaposed
next
complex,
multifaceted
characteristics
elephant’s
natural
environment.
Despite
best
efforts
some
facilities
improve
environment,
serious
welfare
Such
thus
raise
important
ethical
with
regards
well-being.
Language: Английский
Simplifying the Animal Welfare Assessment Grid for enhanced accessibility
Ji‐Yoon Kim,
No information about this author
Juyeong Choi,
No information about this author
HyunYoung Ryu
No information about this author
et al.
Frontiers in Veterinary Science,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
11
Published: Nov. 19, 2024
Ensuring
animal
welfare
is
essential
for
both
the
well-being
of
zoo
animals
and
effective
management
zoological
facilities.
This
study
introduces
Simplified
Animal
Welfare
Assessment
Grid
(S-AWAG),
a
streamlined
adaptation
original
AWAG
framework
that
integrates
Five
Domains
Model
with
an
observation-based
approach.
Designed
non-expert
users,
S-AWAG
focuses
on
easily
observable
indicators-such
as
health
environmental
conditions-making
it
particularly
suitable
small,
private
zoos,
including
petting
roadside
indoor
cafés.
We
conducted
assessments
304
from
11
species
across
nine
zoos
in
South
Korea.
The
results
revealed
significant
differences
standards
between
accredited
non-accredited
facilities
consistently
demonstrating
better
conditions
(
Language: Английский
Development of a welfare assessment tool for tourist camp elephants in Asia
PeerJ,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
12, P. e18370 - e18370
Published: Oct. 28, 2024
Approximately
one-third
of
Asian
elephants
are
managed
under
human
care,
participating
in
educational,
cultural,
religious,
and
tourist
activities.
Management
conditions
vary
considerably
among
venues,
raising
questions
about
whether
welfare
needs
consistently
being
met,
particularly
for
camp
elephants.
To
evaluate
the
well-being
engaged
activities,
an
evidence-based
tool
is
needed
routine
assessments
to
identify
potential
risks,
aid
development
better
standards,
enable
caretakers
address
specific
concerns.
While
many
animal
tools
exist,
none
have
been
designed
consider
environments
management
practices
faced
by
living
working
camps.
Language: Английский
Pilot Investigation of Socio-Spatial Relationships in an Ex Situ White Rhino (Ceratotherium simum simum) Bachelor Group
Lara C. Metrione,
No information about this author
Terri L. Roth,
No information about this author
Yaritza Rodríguez
No information about this author
et al.
Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
5(4), P. 774 - 787
Published: Dec. 6, 2024
Nonbreeding
white
rhino
bulls
are
traditionally
housed
individually
in
zoos,
but
space
limitations
require
the
exploration
of
alternative
techniques.
There
no
studies
group-housed
bulls,
and
feasibility
managing
a
bachelor
group
is
unknown.
Six
(two
each
3-,
5-,
8-yr-olds)
3.1
ha
enclosure
were
observed
for
30
min
2×/wk
20–31
wks.
The
3-yr-olds
relocated
after
first
20
weeks.
Rhino
location,
nearest
neighbor,
aggressive
behaviors,
dominance
interactions
recorded.
was
evidence
habitat
spatial
segregation.
3-
5-yr-olds
grouped
together
by
age;
8-yr-olds
did
not
associate
as
much
younger
rhinos.
Aggressive
vocalizations
physical
aggression
infrequent
(range
0–1.5/h/bull
0–1/h/bull,
respectively).
Eight-year-olds
displayed
received
most;
three-year-olds
most.
After
removed,
usage
social
proximity
remaining
change.
behaviors
increased,
0.18–3.1/h/bull)
remained
more
frequent
than
0.18–0.73/h/bull).
highest-ranking
8-yr-old
engaged
altercations
least.
shared
space,
use
deterred
injury.
These
findings
indicate
that
management
feasible
large
with
young
bulls.
Language: Английский