Agronomy,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
14(5), P. 909 - 909
Published: April 26, 2024
The
ideas
and
methods
that
constitute
the
System
of
Rice
Intensification
(SRI)
were
first
synthesized
in
Madagascar
by
Henri
de
Laulanié
early
1980s
[...]
Agronomy,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
14(2), P. 378 - 378
Published: Feb. 16, 2024
Rice
provides
~20%
of
human
dietary
energy
and,
for
many
people,
a
similar
share
their
protein.
cultivation,
however,
produces
significant
greenhouse
gas
(GHG)
emissions,
comparable
to
those
from
the
aviation
sector.
The
main
GHG
rice
production
is
methane,
mostly
result
conventional
cultivation
(CRC)
keeping
fields
continuously
flooded
during
crop
cycle.
There
extensive
evidence
that
alternate
wetting
and
drying
(AWD)
substantially
reduces
methane
emissions.
AWD
one
component
System
Intensification
(SRI),
an
agroecological
approach
management
plants,
water,
soil,
nutrients.
This
article
reviews
field
studies
measuring
emissions
associated
with
adoption
SRI.
review
confirms
both
SRI
offer
substantial
reductions
in
per
hectare
compared
CRC.
These
benefits
are,
partly
offset
by
increases
nitrous
oxide
carbon
dioxide.
also
show
(but
not
AWD)
improves
yield
therefore
further
kg
rice.
concludes
while
reduce
kilogram
rice,
can
simultaneously
contribute
food
security
addressing
drivers
climate
change.
Further
investigation
sequestration
under
different
methods
needed
strengthen
base.
Conservation
Agriculture
(CA)
and
the
System
of
Rice
Intensification
(SRI)
are
both
agroecologically-oriented
production
systems
that
support
more
productive,
sustainable,
resource-conserving
farming,
with
synergies
arising
from
their
respective
assemblages
reinforcing
agronomic
methods.
Application
CA
principles
enhances
growth,
yield,
performance
crops
grown
under
cropping
system
as
well
health
resilience
whole
ecosystem.
SRI
practices
create
favorable
conditions
for
development
crop
plants
below-
above-ground,
can
be
enhanced
by
management.
such
reduced
plant
density
m-2
elicit
better
phenotypic
expression
genetic
potentials
CA..
For
these
two
to
converge
at
field
level,
some
plant,
soil,
water,
nutrient
management
need
modified
or
aligned.
One
adaptation
is
practice
in
on
permanent,
no-till,
mulch
covered
raised
beds,
rainfall
irrigation
water
furrows
between
beds
furnishing
controlling
water;
providing
weed
suppression
improved
recycling.
rice
benefit
no-tillage,
soil
cover,
diversified
cropping,
paddies
beds.
Several
examples
have
shown
this
convergence
feasible
smallholding
farmers
larger-scale
producers,
also
within
a
amenable
considerable
mechanization.
This
review
article
examines
compatibility
SRI,
considering
being
utilized
complementary
ways.
Further
research
experimentation
needed
identify
assess
appropriate
capitalizing
upon
synergies.
Agronomy,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
13(10), P. 2492 - 2492
Published: Sept. 27, 2023
Initial
evaluations
of
the
System
Rice
Intensification
in
India
and
elsewhere
focused
mainly
on
its
impacts
yield
income,
usually
covered
just
one
or
two
seasons.
Researchers
at
ICAR-Indian
Institute
Research
have
conducted
a
more
comprehensive
evaluation
SRI
methods
over
six
years
(six
wet
dry
seasons),
comparing
them
with
three
alternatives:
modified,
partially
mechanized
(MSRI)
to
reduce
labor
requirements;
direct-seeded
rice
(DSR)
as
an
alternative
method
for
growing
rice;
conventional
transplanting
flooding
fields
(CTF).
Grain
was
found
be
about
50%
higher
than
CTF
(6.35
t
ha−1
vs.
4.27
ha−1),
while
MSRI
essentially
same
(6.34
16%
DSR
(5.45
ha−1).
Water
productivity
5.32–6.85
kg
ha-mm−1,
followed
by
4.14–5.72
ha-mm−1
MSRI,
5.06–5.11
DSR,
3.52–4.56
CTF.
In
comparison
CTF,
significantly
enhanced
soil
microbial
populations
time:
bacteria
12%,
fungi
8%,
actinomycetes
20%.
Biological
activity
rhizosphere
also
indicated
8.5%
greater
dehydrogenase
FDA
enzymes
under
management.
Similarly,
indicator
organic
matter,
glucosidase
activity,
78%
compared
relative
abundance
beneficial
microbial-feeding
nematodes
7.5%
that
plant-pathogenic
lower
SRI.
Relative
methods,
management
reduced
GHG
emissions
21%,
23%,
13%,
standard
rice-growing
practice.
Economic
analysis
showed
both
gross
net
economic
returns
other
systems
evaluated.
While
six-year
study
documented
many
advantages
crop
management,
it
is
promising
adaptation
provides
similar
benefits
but
requirements.
Rice
provides
~20%
of
human
dietary
energy
and,
for
many
people,
a
similar
share
their
protein.
cultivation,
however,
produces
significant
greenhouse
gas
(GHG)
emissions,
comparable
to
those
from
the
aviation
sector.
The
main
GHG
rice
production
is
methane,
mostly
result
conventional
cultivation
(CRC)
keeping
fields
continuously
flooded
during
crop
cycle.
There
extensive
evidence
that
alternate
wetting
and
drying
(AWD)
substantively
reduces
methane
emissions.
AWD
one
component
System
Intensification
(SRI),
an
agroecological
approach
management
plants,
water,
soil
nutrients
practiced
by
millions
farmers
in
both
lowland
irrigated
upland
rainfed
cultivation.
Thirteen
countries
have
included
SRI
Nationally
Determined
Contributions
reduction
or
climate
change
mitigation.
This
article
reviews
16
field
studies
net
emissions
adoption
AWD,
nine
SRI,
two
compared
AWD.
Where
available,
review
includes
data
on
yield
therefore
carbon
dioxide-equivalent
per
kilogram
produced.
indicates
offer
substantial
(~35–41%)
hectare
with
However,
offers
~66%
greater
than
CRC,
rice,
~54%
more
limited
directly
comparing
support
this
finding.
also
appears
potential
sequester
soil.
lowers
farmers’
costs
production,
adds
income
can
make
climate-friendly
methods
attractive.
Both
are
greatly
preferable
current
practices,
but
opportunities
contribute
food
security
while
addressing
drivers
change.
Agronomy,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
14(10), P. 2238 - 2238
Published: Sept. 28, 2024
The
adoption
of
innovations
in
rice
cultivation
is
presumed
to
operate
a
rational
manner,
wherein
new
technologies
or
practices
that
successfully
increase
productivity
resource
efficiency
are
adopted
by
target
farmers
based
on
cost-benefit
calculations.
In
contrast,
this
paper
examines
case
public
initiative
promote
the
system
intensification
(SRI),
widely
disadopted
technique
despite
reporting
increasing
yields
and
reduced
water
consumption.
To
explain
paradox,
we
use
concept
socio-ecological
niche
examine
range
social
institutional
factors
shape
farmers’
decision-making.
These
included
(1)
access
land
labour;
(2)
management
capacity;
(3)
quality
networks
for
knowledge
sharing.
research
suggests
small
variations
these
categories
among
otherwise
similar
smallholder
households
can
markedly
risk
perceptions
tangible
outcomes
with
SRI.
implication
agricultural
should
be
judged
within
their
wider
context
rather
than
narrow
evaluations
agronomic
efficiency.
Importantly,
must
involve
greater
feedback
mechanisms
from
smallholders
variety
socio-economic
profiles
help
character
extension
strategies.
To
combat
food
insecurity
in
Madagascar,
organizations
have
promoted
the
Système
de
Riziculture
Intensifiée
(SRI),
or
System
of
Rice
Intensification,
an
agroecological
rice-growing
technique.
However,
despite
its
many
benefits,
adoption
remains
low
(and
disadoption
high)
Madagascar.
better
understand
these
dynamics,
we
use
data
from
two
surveys
328
rice
farming
households
southeastern
Madagascar
to
conduct
analysis
decisions
adopt
SRI,
as
well
look
at
differences
between
adopters
and
non-adopters.
Results
show
that
strong
intentions
technique,
actual
rates
were
lower
than
expected.
Indeed,
while
89.8%
(n
=
291)
respondents
stated
intention
only
21.6%
60)
had
trialed
it
one
year
later.
also
indicate
exposure
SRI
trainings
did
not
spill-over
effects
"untreated"
farmers,
nearly
all
(95%,
n
57)
farmers
adopting
registered
for
training,
with
majority
(89.5%,
51)
attending
some
days
training.
Reasons
given
included
lack
seeds
deemed
suitable
by
insufficient
labor,
time
other
resources.
Furthermore,
using
integrated
Theory
Planned
Behavior
-
Technology
Acceptance
Model
framework
structural
equation
modeling
(SEM),
find
perceived
behavioral
control,
training
participation
household
assets
are
significant
predictors
adoption.
This
research
is
important
efforts
support
uptake
improved
agricultural
practices
among
insecure
populations.
It
fills
a
gap
literature
regarding
lowland
coastal
Agronomy,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
13(11), P. 2758 - 2758
Published: Nov. 1, 2023
Conservation
Agriculture
(CA)
and
the
System
of
Rice
Intensification
(SRI)
are
both
agroecologically-oriented
production
systems
that
support
more
productive,
sustainable,
resource-conserving
farming,
with
synergies
arising
from
their
respective
assemblages
reinforcing
agronomic
methods.
This
review
article
examines
compatibility
between
CA
SRI,
considering
examples
being
utilized
in
complementary
ways.
The
application
principles
enhances
growth,
yield,
performance
crops
grown
under
cropping
system
as
well
health
resilience
whole
ecosystem.
SRI
practices
create
favorable
conditions
for
development
crop
plants
below-
above-ground,
including
can
be
enhanced
by
management.
such
reduced
plant
density
m−2
elicit
a
better
phenotypic
expression
genetic
potentials
CA.
For
these
two
to
converge
at
field
level,
some
plant,
soil,
water,
nutrient
management
need
modified
or
aligned.
One
adaptation
is
practice
on
permanent,
no-till,
mulch-covered
raised
beds,
rainfall
irrigation
water
furrows
beds
furnishing
controlling
providing
weed
suppression
improved
recycling.
rice
benefit
no-tillage,
mulch
soil
cover,
diversified
cropping,
paddies
beds.
Several
have
shown
this
convergence
feasible
smallholding
farmers
larger-scale
producers
also
within
amenable
considerable
mechanization.
Further
research
experimentation
needed
identify
assess
appropriate
capitalizing
upon
synergies.
CABI Agriculture and Bioscience,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
5(1)
Published: Nov. 15, 2024
Abstract
Background
Rice
is
a
major
contributor
to
anthropogenic
greenhouse
gas
(GHG)
emissions,
primarily
methane,
and
at
the
same
time
will
be
negatively
impacted
by
regional
climate
changes.
Identifying
rice
management
interventions
reduce
methane
emissions
while
improving
productivity
is,
therefore,
critical
for
change
mitigation,
adaptation,
food
security.
However,
it
can
challenging
conduct
multivariate
assessments
of
in
field
owing
intensiveness
data
collection
and/or
challenges
testing
long-term
changes
meteorological
conditions.
Process-based
modeling,
evaluated
against
site-based
data,
provides
an
entry
point
evaluating
impacts
on
systems
assessing
impacts,
co-benefits,
trade-offs
under
historical
future
Methods
We
leverage
existing
model
combined
yields,
water
using
suite
process-based
coupled
crop-soil
experiments
83
growing
sites
across
Red
River
Delta,
Vietnam.
test
three
with
our
model,
characterized
Alternate
Wetting
Drying
(AWD)
other
principles
representing
System
Intensification
(SRI).
Our
simulations
are
forced
as
well
conditions,
represented
five
Earth
Models
high-emission
scenario
centered
year
2050.
evaluate
efficacy
these
mitigation
adaptation
change.
Results
Two
SRI
significantly
increased
yields
(one
over
50%)
conditions
also
reducing
(or
not
increasing)
emissions.
These
increase
relative
baseline
practices,
although
decreases
absolute
all
practices.
Generally,
where
yield
improved,
so
did
crop
water-use
efficiency.
were
mixed
resulted
depending
comparison.
Nevertheless,
one
intervention
reduced
increase)
both
systems,
there
was
considerable
variation
selected
models.
Conclusions
high-yielding
varieties,
implemented
site-specific
serve
goals,
magnitude
changes,
particularly
warming,
may
respect
reductions.
Future
work
should
better
bracket
important
sensitivities
models
disentangle
which
factors
drive
responses
shown.
Furthermore,
analyses
that
integrate
findings
into
socio-economic
assessment
inform
if
how
SRI/AWD
potentially
benefit
farmer
livelihoods
now
future,
adoption
scaling
principles.
JOURNAL OF OASIS AGRICULTURE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
5(5), P. 13 - 23
Published: Nov. 3, 2023
With
the
world
needing
to
feed
an
estimated
10
billion
people
by
2050,
paradigms
of
organic
and
conventional
agriculture
play
a
critical
role
in
meeting
these
needs
ensuring
environmental
protection.
This
review
critically
examines
two
agricultural
tracing
their
historical
roots
exploring
techniques,
impacts,
economic
considerations,
contributions
global
food
security.
We
highlight
footprints
with
particular
attention
soil
health,
water
management,
greenhouse
gas
emissions,
biodiversity.
In
addition,
health
impacts
produced
both
systems
societal
implications
will
be
discussed,
closer
look
at
aspects
consumer
safety,
community
dynamics,
market
trends.
By
highlighting
strengths
challenges
farming
systems,
this
argues
for
integrative
approach
that
leverages
best
practices
from
worlds.
Such
harmonization
aims
create
sustainable
future
not
only
feeds
humanity
but
also
preserves
ecological
balance
on
our
planet.
Rice
provides
~20%
of
human
dietary
energy
and,
for
many
people,
a
similar
share
their
protein.
cultivation,
however,
produces
significant
greenhouse
gas
(GHG)
emissions,
comparable
to
those
from
the
aviation
sector.
The
main
GHG
rice
production
is
methane,
mostly
result
conventional
cultivation
(CRC)
keeping
fields
continuously
flooded
during
crop
cycle.
There
extensive
evidence
that
alternate
wetting
and
drying
(AWD)
substantially
reduces
methane
emissions.
AWD
one
component
System
Intensification
(SRI),
an
agroecological
approach
management
plants,
water,
soil
nutrients
practiced
by
millions
farmers
in
both
lowland
irrigated
upland
rainfed
cultivation.
Thirteen
countries
have
included
SRI
Nationally
Determined
Contributions
reduction
or
climate
change
mitigation.
This
article
reviews
16
field
studies
net
emissions
adoption
AWD,
eight
SRI,
two
compared
AWD.
Where
available,
review
includes
data
on
yield
therefore
carbon
dioxide-equivalent
per
kilogram
produced.
indicates
offer
substantial
(~35–41%)
hectare
with
However,
offers
~66%
greater
than
CRC,
rice,
~54%
more
limited
directly
comparing
support
this
finding.
also
appears
potential
sequester
soil.
lowers
farmers’
costs
production,
adds
income
can
make
climate-friendly
methods
attractive.
Both
are
greatly
preferable
current
practices,
but
opportunities
contribute
food
security
while
addressing
drivers
change.