Beyond saving lives: Political ecology, animal welfare, and the challenges of wildlife rehabilitation in Costa Rica
Sarah Coose,
No information about this author
Bastian Thomsen,
No information about this author
Tamsin Dodsworth
No information about this author
et al.
Human-Animal Interactions,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: March 25, 2025
Abstract
Wildlife
rehabilitation
in
Costa
Rica
is
a
deeply
complex
and
often
precarious
endeavor,
shaped
by
the
intersection
of
local
socio-political
realities,
environmental
pressures,
inherent
limitations
centers
themselves.
These
factors
not
only
challenge
governance
wildlife
conservation
but
also
profoundly
affect
daily
lives
staff
nonhuman
animals
they
care
for
(hereafter
simplicity).
This
ethnobiology
study
doctoral
pilot
an
extension
longitudinal
led
second
fifth
authors
that
commenced
2021.
explores
lived
experiences
veterinarians,
staff,
two
prominent
Rica.
Findings
provide
insights
into
ways
external
socio-political-ecological
forces
intertwine
with
everyday
practices
animal
centers.
research
was
conducted
over
2-weeks
late
2024,
approximately
65
hours
participant
observation
39
in-depth
interviews
volunteers,
staff.
Through
immersive
ethnographic
fieldwork,
data
were
gathered
through
observation,
semi-structured
unstructured
interviews,
archival
data.
Data
recorded
using
field
notes,
which
later
coded
analyzed.
The
primary
focus
this
to
understand
quotidian
realities
resource
constraints,
emotional
labor,
ethical
dilemmas,
team
dynamics,
while
considering
broader
cultural,
political,
ecological,
shape
process.
Three
key
thematic
findings
emerged
from
study:
(1)
operational
challenges
due
restraints
complexities
communication
teamwork
within
centers,
(2)
tensions
practitioners
face
when
balancing
compassionate
institutional
limitations,
(3)
effects
sociopolitical
how
well-intentioned
policies,
aimed
at
protecting
wildlife,
result
unintended
negative
consequences
individual
welfare.
underscores
layered
suggests
need
more
integrated
approach
lens
accounts
goals
individualized
care.
demonstrates
can
inform
biological
positive
methodological
feedback
loop,
where
logical
next
steps
should
be
carry
out
focuses
on
behavior
(ethology)
measurable
indicators
stress
(e.g.,
cortisol
analysis)
better
assess
welfare
conditions
each
phase
Language: Английский
A field-based Conservation Welfare Assessment Framework for Costa Rican primate sanctuaries
Human-Animal Interactions,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: April 22, 2025
Abstract
This
article
offers
a
methodological
contribution
to
the
study
of
field-based
wild
animal
welfare
assessments
in
developing
tourism
contexts.
Grounded
interdisciplinary
fields
conservation
and
ethnoprimatology,
it
introduces
preliminary,
non-invasive,
transdisciplinary,
Conservation
Welfare
Assessment
Framework
(CWAF)
tailored
non-human
primate
sanctuary
attractions
Costa
Rica.
holistic
approach
provides
24
evaluative
criteria
across
eight
categories:
mental
experiences,
good
environment,
physical
health,
events,
projects,
community
outreach,
environmental
education
.
Emphasizing
relational
accessible
methodology
similar
multispecies
ethnography,
framework
encourages
mixed,
socio-ecological
methods
including
participant
observation,
behavioural
document
review,
social
inquiry
with
key
informants,
members,
tourists
guide
data
collection.
Finally,
I
reviewed
framework’s
applications
suggestions
for
future
research.
Language: Английский