Published: Oct. 21, 2024
Language: Английский
Published: Oct. 21, 2024
Language: Английский
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 10(1), P. 75 - 75
Published: Feb. 24, 2025
Background: Whole-body vibration is a modality of exercise that uses high-frequency mechanical stimuli to enhance motor functions. Previous studies have demonstrated benefits whole-body in older adults. However, prolonged use this may be detrimental certain conditions. Objectives: verify the acute effects single session on mobility and postural control community-dwelling Methods: In two-arm, single-blind clinical trial, fifty-two participants were randomly allocated either experimental (subject with amplitude 2 mm frequency 40 Hz) or placebo group. The sessions conducted using tri-planar platform. tri-plane plates adjusted vibrate up down, side side, front back. assessments included tests. Repeated-measures analyses variance performed examine main effect group (experimental vs. placebo), time (baseline after intervention), × interaction effect. Significance was set at 5%. Results: Compared group, who underwent showed positive outcomes terms (p = 0.014, size: 0.115). Contrastingly, no significant differences observed between groups > 0.05). Conclusions: Benefits mobility. Using improve require additional sessions. Contraindications typical aging should taken into account.
Language: Английский
Citations
0Fisioterapia e Pesquisa, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 32
Published: Jan. 1, 2025
RESUMO: O objetivo deste estudo foi investigar a viabilidade, os benefícios e desafios do uso ambiente aquático para avaliar testes funcionais na comparação com avaliações realizadas em solo. Neste estudo, 40 indivíduos foram submetidos ao teste de caminhada seis minutos (TC6), subida degraus dois (TSD2’) timed-up-and-go (TUG), tanto solo quanto uma piscina 1,2 metros profundidade. esforço dos participantes medido pela escala Borg. Testes t Student Cohen d usados comparar entre ambientes. Significância estipulada 5%. Em o solo, caminharam menos água durante TC6 (d=3,69, p<0,001) levaram mais tempo completar TUG (d=2,76, p=0,001). Não observadas diferenças no ambientes (p=0,055) (p=0,32). relação TSD2’, não houve diferença número (p=0,45) experimentaram um menor (d=1,15, conclusão, aquáticos são opção viável realizar funcionais. Embora possa ter aumentado dificuldade certos testes, igual ou que
Citations
0Fisioterapia e Pesquisa, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 32
Published: Jan. 1, 2025
ABSTRACT: This study aimed to investigate the feasibility, benefits, and challenges of using aquatic environment assess physical function tests compared with land-based assessments. A total 40 individuals underwent 6-minute walk test (6MWT), 2-minute step (2MST), timed get-up-and-go (TUG) test, both on land in a 1.2-meter water depth pool. Perceived exertion was measured Modified Borg scale. Paired Student’s t-tests Cohen d were used compare assessments . Significance set at 5%. Compared land, participants walked less during 6MWT (d =3.69, p<0.001) took longer complete TUG =2.76, p=0.001). No differences observed perceived between (p=0.055) (p=0.32). Regarding 2MST, there no difference performance environments (p=0.45). Conversely, experienced lower 2MST (=1.15, In conclusion, an is feasible option for conducting functional tests. Although may have increased difficulty certain assessments, either than or comparable that land.
Language: Английский
Citations
0Published: Oct. 21, 2024
Language: Английский
Citations
1