The Role of Lymphadenectomy in the Surgical Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis DOI Open Access
Gabriele Spoletini,

Alberto Mauro,

Miriam Caimano

et al.

Cancers, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 16(24), P. 4166 - 4166

Published: Dec. 13, 2024

Background: Lymphadenectomy in the operative management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial, with no recommendation for routine practice. Our study aimed to assess effects lymphadenectomy addition hepatic resection (HR) compared HR alone adults HCC. Methods: This systematic review was conducted according PRISMA guidelines until March 2023, searching and selecting relevant literature comparing lymph node dissection or sampling, combined HR, removal. Critical appraisal included studies performed using ROBINS-I tool. Fixed- random-effect meta-analysis models were carried out, inter-studies assessed heterogeneity. Results: Fourteen selected during screening process. Data from eight containing 32,041 HCC patients quantitative synthesis. In total, 12,694 underwent (LND), either selectively preoperatively diagnosed intraoperatively suspected metastasis (LNM) unselectively (i.e., regardless LNM). According LN status, 1-, 3- 5-year mortality rates higher LNM group respect both clinically negative (OR 3.25, 95% CI 2.52–4.21; p < 0.001; OR 3.79, 2.74–5.24; 3.92, 2.61–5.88; 0.001) proven LN0 1.75, 1.0–3.04; = 0.05; 2.88, 1.79–4.63; 2.54, 1.33–4.84; 0.001). Moreover, summary estimates two controlled trials showed significant difference overall survival between LND groups those without patients. Conclusions: Lymph does not appear improve survival, available literature; thus, this support its adoption as part standard liver A case-by-case decision advisable.

Language: Английский

New Scenarios in Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma DOI Creative Commons
Ezequiel Mauro, Manuel Rodríguez‐Perálvarez, Antonio D’Alessio

et al.

Liver International, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Nov. 4, 2024

ABSTRACT Background and Aims Despite liver transplantation (LT) is considered the optimal treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), particularly in patients with impaired function, shortage of donors has forced application very restrictive criteria selecting ideal candidates whom LT can offer best outcome. With evolving landscape due to advent direct‐acting antivirals (DAAs) steady increase donors, major efforts have been made expand transplant eligibility HCC. In addition, emergence immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) HCC, demonstrated efficacy earlier stages, revolutionized therapeutic approach these patients, their integration setting challenging. Management immunological compromise from ICIs, including wash‐out period before post‐LT immunosuppression adjustments, crucial balance risk graft rejection against HCC recurrence. Additionally, effects increased on non‐hepatic complications must be understood prevent them becoming obstacles long‐term OS. Methods Results this review, we will evaluate emerging evidence its implications future Addressing novel challenges opportunities, while integrating current clinical predictive algorithms, would ensure a fair between individual patient needs overall population benefit system.

Language: Английский

Citations

2

Systemic Treatment of Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Liver Transplantation: A Multicenter Trial DOI Open Access

Vera Himmelsbach,

Matthias Jeschke, Christian Lange

et al.

Cancers, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 16(13), P. 2442 - 2442

Published: July 3, 2024

The tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) sorafenib and lenvatinib represent the first-line systemic therapy of choice for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT). Under lenvatinib, HCC have shown increasingly improved overall survival in clinical studies over years. In contrast, data on LT under TKIs are scarce limited to small retrospective series. this retrospective, multicenter study, we investigated efficacy TKI influence immunosuppression LT.

Language: Английский

Citations

1

The Role of Lymphadenectomy in the Surgical Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis DOI Open Access
Gabriele Spoletini,

Alberto Mauro,

Miriam Caimano

et al.

Cancers, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 16(24), P. 4166 - 4166

Published: Dec. 13, 2024

Background: Lymphadenectomy in the operative management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial, with no recommendation for routine practice. Our study aimed to assess effects lymphadenectomy addition hepatic resection (HR) compared HR alone adults HCC. Methods: This systematic review was conducted according PRISMA guidelines until March 2023, searching and selecting relevant literature comparing lymph node dissection or sampling, combined HR, removal. Critical appraisal included studies performed using ROBINS-I tool. Fixed- random-effect meta-analysis models were carried out, inter-studies assessed heterogeneity. Results: Fourteen selected during screening process. Data from eight containing 32,041 HCC patients quantitative synthesis. In total, 12,694 underwent (LND), either selectively preoperatively diagnosed intraoperatively suspected metastasis (LNM) unselectively (i.e., regardless LNM). According LN status, 1-, 3- 5-year mortality rates higher LNM group respect both clinically negative (OR 3.25, 95% CI 2.52–4.21; p < 0.001; OR 3.79, 2.74–5.24; 3.92, 2.61–5.88; 0.001) proven LN0 1.75, 1.0–3.04; = 0.05; 2.88, 1.79–4.63; 2.54, 1.33–4.84; 0.001). Moreover, summary estimates two controlled trials showed significant difference overall survival between LND groups those without patients. Conclusions: Lymph does not appear improve survival, available literature; thus, this support its adoption as part standard liver A case-by-case decision advisable.

Language: Английский

Citations

0