Sustainability Analysis of Commercial-Scale Biogas Plants in Pakistan vs. Germany: A Novel Analytic Hierarchy Process—SMARTER Approach
Fizza Tahir,
No information about this author
Rizwan Rasheed,
No information about this author
Mumtaz Fatima
No information about this author
et al.
Sustainability,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
17(5), P. 2168 - 2168
Published: March 3, 2025
The
development
of
biogas
technology
is
essential
as
a
renewable
energy
source,
aiding
global
initiatives
in
sustainable
production
and
waste
management.
Geographical,
technological,
economic
factors
significantly
vary
the
efficiency
viability
facilities
by
area.
This
study
compares
techno-economic,
social,
environmental
impacts
plants
Germany
Pakistan
using
multicriteria
decision-making
method
that
combines
Analytic
Hierarchy
Process
SMARTER.
research
has
determined
weighting
then
assessed
comparative
performance
six
selected
based
on
five
different
scenarios:
(i)
comprehensive
base-case,
(ii)
performance,
(iii)
(iv)
social
(v)
per-kW
efficiency.
Three
these
are
(a
low–medium-income
developing
country)
three
high-income
developed
country).
findings
indicate
technical
most
heavily
weighted
criterion,
playing
crucial
role
determining
overall
sustainability
scores.
Germany’s
Bioenergie
Park
Güstrow
stood
out
leading
performer,
achieving
scores
63.1%,
72.9%,
73.0%
across
environmental,
scenarios,
respectively.
In
same
Gujjar
Colony
Biogas
Plant
recorded
lowest
25.4%,
43.2%,
53.0%.
from
country
showed
progressive
score
high
impact
towards
scenarios.
contrast,
low
bioenergy
deployment
due
to
various
factors,
highlighting
gaps
flaws
optimized
generation
growth.
critical
techno-economic
socio-environmental
vital
for
policymakers,
industry,
engineers,
other
relevant
stakeholders
seeking
enhance
scalability,
technologies
economies.
Language: Английский
Alternative Prioritization for Mitigating Competition-Related Issues in Tanzania Sugar Industry Using an Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach
Heliyon,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
11(4), P. e41521 - e41521
Published: Dec. 28, 2024
Professionals
and
policymakers
often
encounter
challenges
in
selecting
ranking
effective
solutions
to
address
competition-related
issues
various
industries
including
sugar
industry.
Despite
extensive
research
this
area,
the
Tanzanian
context,
significantly
impacted
by
these
challenges,
has
not
received
sufficient
attention.
Thus,
study
aims
fill
gap
identifying
prioritizing
issues.
It
proposes
four
strategies
establishes
five
criteria
for
prioritization.
To
achieve
this,
introduces
an
integrated
methodology
assess
weights
rank
based
on
weighted
criteria.
The
FullEX
technique
is
applied
weights,
while
AROMAN
(Alternative
Ranking
Order
Method
Accounting
Two-Step
Normalization)
method
used
alternatives.
validates
through
a
sensitivity
comparative
analyses,
which
identifies
amendment
of
law
accommodate
leniency
program
(S1)
as
most
appropriate
strategy
mitigating
Language: Английский