COVID,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
2(3), P. 273 - 340
Published: March 9, 2022
A
systematic
review
of
the
literature
investigating
effects
COVID-19
pandemic
on
psychological
and
psychosocial
factors
was
completed.
Published
examined
using
electronic
databases
to
search
such
as
beliefs
media
persuasion,
social
support,
coping,
risk
perception,
compliance
distancing;
anxiety,
stress,
depression,
other
consequences
that
impacted
mental
health
among
pandemic.
total
294
papers
referring
first
wave
(December
2019–June
2020)
were
selected
for
review.
The
findings
suggested
a
general
deterioration
health,
delineating
sort
“psychological
syndrome”,
characterized
by
increased
decreased
well-being
sleep
quality.
effect
dimensions
interest
not
same
everyone.
Indeed,
some
socio-demographic
variables
exacerbated
repercussions
occurred
due
In
particular,
healthcare
workers
young
women
(especially
those
in
postpartum
condition)
with
low
income
levels
education
have
been
shown
be
least
resilient
Scientific Reports,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
11(1)
Published: May 13, 2021
To
provide
a
contemporary
global
prevalence
of
mental
health
issues
among
the
general
population
amid
coronavirus
disease-2019
(COVID-19)
pandemic.
We
searched
electronic
databases,
preprint
grey
literature,
and
unpublished
studies
from
January
1,
2020,
to
June
16,
2020
(updated
on
July
11,
2020),
with
no
language
restrictions.
Observational
using
validated
measurement
tools
reporting
data
were
screened
identify
all
relevant
studies.
have
included
information
32
different
countries
398,771
participants.
The
pooled
COVID-19
pandemic
varied
widely
across
regions
was
higher
than
previous
reports
before
outbreak
began.
estimate
28.0%
for
depression;
26.9%
anxiety;
24.1%
post-traumatic
stress
symptoms;
36.5%
stress;
50.0%
psychological
distress;
27.6%
sleep
problems.
Data
are
limited
other
aspects
issues.
Our
findings
highlight
disparities
between
in
terms
poverty
impacts
COVID-19,
preparedness
respond,
economic
vulnerabilities
that
impact
Research
social
burden
is
needed
better
manage
problems
during
after
epidemics
or
pandemics.
Systematic
review
registration:
PROSPERO
CRD
42020177120.
PLoS ONE,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
15(7), P. e0236562 - e0236562
Published: July 28, 2020
The
acute
and
long-term
mental
health
impacts
of
the
COVID-19
pandemic
are
unknown.
current
study
examined
responses
to
in
5070
adult
participants
Australia,
using
an
online
survey
administered
during
peak
outbreak
Australia
(27th
March
7th
April
2020).
Self-report
questionnaires
fears
behavioural
COVID-19,
as
well
severity
psychological
distress
(depression,
anxiety
stress),
anxiety,
contamination
fears,
alcohol
use,
physical
activity.
78%
respondents
reported
that
their
had
worsened
since
outbreak,
one
quarter
(25.9%)
were
very
or
extremely
worried
about
contracting
half
(52.7%)
family
friends
COVID-19.
Uncertainty,
loneliness
financial
worries
(50%)
common.
Rates
elevated
higher
than
expected,
with
62%,
50%,
64%
reporting
depression,
stress
levels
respectively,
four
past
week.
Participants
self-reported
history
a
diagnosis
significantly
distress,
those
without
prior
diagnosis.
Demographic
(e.g.,
non-binary
different
gender
identity;
Aboriginal
Torres
Strait
Islander
status),
occupational
being
carer
stay
at
home
parent),
perceived
risk
COVID-19)
factors
associated
distress.
Results
revealed
precautionary
behaviours
washing
hands,
hand
sanitiser,
avoiding
social
events)
common,
although
contrast
previous
research,
engagement
hygiene
was
levels.
These
results
highlight
serious
impact
on
respondents,
need
for
proactive,
accessible
digital
services
address
these
needs,
particularly
most
vulnerable,
including
people
problems.
Longitudinal
research
is
needed
explore
predictors
poor
from
pandemic.
PLoS ONE,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
15(12), P. e0244630 - e0244630
Published: Dec. 28, 2020
The
Coronavirus
Disease
2019
(COVID-19)
outbreak
has
escalated
the
burden
of
psychological
distress.
We
aimed
to
evaluate
factors
associated
with
distress
among
predominantly
general
population
during
COVID-19
pandemic.We
searched
PubMed,
EMBASE,
Scopus,
Cochrane
Library,
PsycINFO,
and
World
Health
Organization
databases
(Dec
2019-15
July
2020).
included
cross-sectional
studies
that
reported
pandemic.
Primary
outcomes
were
self-reported
symptoms
anxiety
depression.
Random-effects
models
used
pool
odds
ratios
(OR)
95%
confidence
intervals
(CI).
protocol
was
registered
in
PROSPERO
(#CRD42020186735).We
68
comprising
288,830
participants
from
19
countries.
prevalence
depression
33%
(95%
CI:
28%-39%)
30%
(26%-36%).
Women
versus
men
(OR:
1.48
[95%
1.29-1.71;
I2
=
90.8%]),
younger
older
(<
≥35
years)
adults
(1.20
[1.13-1.26];
91.7%),
living
rural
urban
areas
(1.13
[1.00-1.29];
82.9%),
lower
higher
socioeconomic
status
(e.g.
income:
1.45
[1.24-1.69;
82.3%])
odds.
These
(except
for
residential
area)
also
Furthermore,
infection
risk
(suspected/confirmed
cases,
hard-hit
areas,
having
pre-existing
physical
or
mental
conditions)
longer
media
exposure
depression.One
three
have
related
Concerted
efforts
are
urgently
needed
interventions
high-risk
populations
reduce
urban-rural,
gender
disparities
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
17(24), P. 9419 - 9419
Published: Dec. 15, 2020
The
coronavirus
disease
(COVID-19)
pandemic
has
been
devastating
in
all
senses,
particularly
psychologically.
Physical
activity
(PA)
is
known
to
aid
psychological
well-being,
and
it
worth
investigating
whether
PA
a
coping
strategy
during
this
pandemic.
objective
of
literature
review
analyze
the
extent
which
engaging
COVID-19
impacts
health
adult
population.
was
searched
databases
from
EBSCOhost
Research
Database—MEDLINE,
APA
PsycArticles,
between
others—published
1
January
2019
15
July
2020.
From
180
articles
found,
were
eligible.
reviewed
showed
an
association
mental
distress—e.g.,
stress,
anxiety,
depressive
symptoms,
social
isolation,
distress—and
PA.
This
research
concludes
that
lockdown
measures
caused
distress.
Those
studies
analyzed
that,
quarantine,
adults
increased
their
sedentary
time
reduced
levels,
showing
controversial
outcomes.
discusses
effective
face
effects
contributing
further
putative
increase
prevalence
psychiatric
disorders.
PLoS ONE,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
15(9), P. e0239397 - e0239397
Published: Sept. 25, 2020
The
Covid-19
pandemic
raises
questions
about
the
role
that
relationships
and
interactions
between
humans
animals
play
in
context
of
widespread
social
distancing
isolation
measures.
We
aimed
to
investigate
links
mental
health
loneliness,
companion
animal
ownership,
human-animal
bond,
interactions;
explore
owners'
perceptions
related
their
during
lockdown.A
cross-sectional
online
survey
UK
residents
over
18
years
age
was
conducted
April
June
2020.
questionnaire
included
validated
bespoke
items
measuring
demographics;
exposures
outcomes
health,
wellbeing
loneliness;
bond
interactions.Of
5,926
participants,
5,323
(89.8%)
had
at
least
one
animal.
Most
perceived
be
a
source
considerable
support,
but
concerns
were
reported
various
practical
aspects
providing
care
lockdown.
Strength
did
not
differ
significantly
species.
Poorer
pre-lockdown
associated
with
stronger
(b
=
-.014,
95%
CI
[-.023
-
-.005],
p
.002).
Animal
ownership
compared
non-ownership
smaller
decreases
.267,
[.079
.455],
.005)
increases
loneliness
-.302,
[-.461
-.144],
.001)
since
lockdown.The
is
construct
may
linked
vulnerability
owners.
terms
emotional
closeness
or
intimacy
dimensions
appears
independent
seemed
mitigate
some
detrimental
psychological
effects
Further
targeted
investigation
for
human
including
testing
buffering
hypothesis
development
instruments
suited
use
across
species,
required.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
17(15), P. 5485 - 5485
Published: July 29, 2020
The
present
paper
intends
to
address
the
impact
of
COVID-19
crisis
upon
consumer
buying
behavior
fresh
vegetables
directly
from
local
producers
as
observed
30
days
later,
after
enforcing
state
emergency
in
Romania
within
a
well-defined
area,
namely,
quarantined
area
Suceava.
study
relies
on
interpretation
answers
received
(N
=
257)
questionnaire
applied
online
nationwide.
starting
point
this
is
analysis
sociodemographic
factors
purchasing
decision
before
declaring
(16
March
2020).
Further
research
has
been
conducted
by
interpreting
changes
triggered
intention
such
products
and
end
respective
crisis.
aim
scientific
investigation
identifying
methods
which
these
behavioral
can
influence
digital
transformation
short
food
supply
chains.
Frontiers in Psychiatry,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
11
Published: Sept. 3, 2020
Introduction:
Physical
distancing
has
encouraged
the
public
to
utilize
Internet
for
virtually
all
daily
activities
during
COVID-19
pandemic.
This
study
aimed
assess
impact
of
addiction
(IA)
prevalence
and
analyzed
correlated
factors
quarantine
Methods:
An
online
survey
was
generated
comprising
demographic
section,
Addiction
Diagnostic
Questionnaire
(KDAI),
Symptoms
Checklist-90,
Pittsburgh
Sleep
Quality
Index.
The
hyperlink
disseminated
through
social
media,
companies,
universities.
Overall,
4,734
adults
(mean
age
31.84±7.73
years
old
55.2%
males)
representing
34
provinces
Indonesia
gave
valid
responses.
Results:
Point
IA
pandemic
14.4%
in
Indonesian
adults.
Online
duration
increased
by
52%
compared
before
not
established
as
a
risk
IA.
Increased
duration,
specific
motivations,
types
application,
having
confirmed/suspected
cases
within
household
were
predictive
All
sub-scales
SCL-90
PSQI
higher
group
with
positive/suspect
scores
Discussion:
alone
associated
than
previously
proposed
rate
among
adults,
which
might
be
related
digital
popularity
virtual
socializing.
Furthermore,
psychopathologies
sleep
disruptions
occurrences
especially
prevalent
proximity
COVID-19.
Fear
contraction
rampant
misinformation
probably
contributed
these
potentially
harbor
long-term
consequences.
Conclusion:
current
demonstrated
high
point
identified
several
preventable
home-quarantine
COVID-19,
household.
However,
physical
did
increase
odds
Public
health
agencies
should
maintain
advisory
while
providing
adaptive
psychiatric
education
service.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
17(18), P. 6794 - 6794
Published: Sept. 17, 2020
Mental
health
effects
secondary
to
the
COVID-19
pandemic
were
till
recently
considered
less
important
or
neglected.
Portugal
and
Brazil
are
facing
in
quite
different
ways.
This
study
aimed
describe
mental
status
of
general
adult
population
during
analyze
differences
between
two
countries.
A
cross-sectional
quantitative
was
based
on
an
online
questionnaire.
Socio-demographic
data
collected
addition
four
validated
scales:
CAGE
(acronym
cut-annoyed-guilty-eye)
Questionnaire,
Satisfaction
with
Life
Scale,
Generalized
Anxiety
Disorder-7
Patient
Health
Questionnaire-2.
For
each
outcome,
a
multiple
linear
regression
performed.
Five
hundred
fifty
people
answered
questionnaire
(435
women).
The
median
age
38
(Q1,
Q3:
30,
47)
years,
52.5%
resided
47.5%
Portugal.
prevalence
anxiety
71.3%
(mild
present
43.1%),
depression
24.7%
23.8%
sample
had
both
anxiety.
Isolation
significant
factor
for
but
not
Well-being
below
average.
illness
considerably
higher
than
pre-COVID-19
levels.
will
have
be
prepared
future
consequences
poor
contribute
immediate
psychological
support
their
populations.
BMC Psychiatry,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
21(1)
Published: Jan. 12, 2021
Abstract
Background
Social
dislocations
resulting
from
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
pandemic
have
been
prolonged,
which
has
led
to
general
population
social
suppression.
The
present
study
aimed
reveal
risk
factors
associated
with
mental
health
problems
and
suggest
concrete
coping
strategies
in
the
context
of
COVID-19.
Methods
A
web-based
survey
was
conducted
July
when
Japan
experiencing
a
second
wave
Demographics,
Patient
Health
Questionnaire-9
(PHQ-9),
state
anger,
anger
control,
Brief
Coping
Orientation
Problems
Experienced
were
measured.
Multivariate
logistic
regression
analysis
on
PHQ-9
scores
by
set
variables
conducted.
Results
participants
2708
individuals,
18.35%
them
depressed.
Logistic
showed
that
order
odds
ratios
(ORs),
underlying
(OR
=
1.96,
95%
confidence
interval
(CI)
1.32–2.92),
not
working
1.85,
CI
1.22–2.80),
negative
economic
impact
1.33,
1.01–1.77),
1.17,
1.14–1.21),
control
1.08,
1.04–1.13),
age
0.97,
0.96–0.98),
high
income
0.45,
0.25–0.80),
being
married
0.53,
0.38–0.74)
predictors
depressive
symptoms.
Regarding
strategies,
planning
0.84,
0.74–0.94),
use
instrumental
support
0.85,
0.76–0.95),
denial
0.88,
0.77–0.99),
behavioural
disengagement
1.28,
1.13–1.44),
self-blame
1.47,
1.31–1.65)
probable
depression.
Conclusions
During
prolonged
psychological
distress
caused
COVID-19
pandemic,
prevalence
symptoms
two
nine
times
as
before
even
though
lockdown
country.
Although
some
useful
for
maintaining
health,
such
developing
ways,
alone
or
others,
address
avoid
dislocations,
influence
demographics
more
powerful
than
these
medical
treatments
are
needed
high-risk
individuals.