Scientific Reports,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
15(1)
Published: March 27, 2025
Abstract
Surgical
masks(SM)
have
become
essential
to
our
daily
lives
with
the
COVID-19
pandemic.
It
is
recommended
as
cheapest,
most
effective
preventive
method.
The
effects
of
SM
on
patients
receiving
chemotherapy
are
unknown.
Our
study
aimed
investigate
oxygenation
and
CO2
retention
in
cancer
examine
its
possible
clinical
consequences.
Patients
diagnosed
were
included
study.
Venous
blood
gas,
SO2
by
pulse
oximeter,
vital
signs
recorded
before
after
treatment.
Acute
toxicities
encountered
during
treatment
recorded.
One
hundred
twenty-six
a
median
age
60
(33–85)
evaluated
comparison
pre-post
parameters
showed
statistically
significant
changes
Ph
(7.37
vs.
7.35,
p
<
0.01),
pCO2
(44.2
45.8,
=
0.049),
HCO3
(25.7
25.3,
0.003),
SpO2
(97.0
96.0,
0.08),
fever
(36.4
36.3,
0.023).
All
clinically
insignificant
normal
ranges.
Chemotherapy-related
acute
toxicity
was
noted
4
(3.2%)
patients.
Lung
morbidity,
type,
lung
metastasis
status,
applied,
duration
therapy,
do
not
affect
current
parameters.
In
study,
it
shown
that
constantly
wearing
caused
tendency
hypoxemia.
However,
within
range.
masks
can
be
used
safely
systemic
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
19(3), P. 1063 - 1063
Published: Jan. 18, 2022
The
ongoing
COVID-19
pandemic
requires
wearing
face
masks
in
many
areas
of
our
daily
life;
hence,
the
potential
side
effects
mask
use
are
discussed.
Therefore,
present
study
explores
whether
a
medical
(MedMask)
affects
physical
working
capacity
(PWC).
Secondary,
influence
filtering
facepiece
with
exhalation
valve
class
2
(FFP2exhal)
and
cotton
fabric
(community
mask)
on
PWC
was
also
investigated.
Furthermore,
corresponding
physiological
subjective
responses
when
as
well
moderating
role
subjects'
individual
cardiorespiratory
fitness
sex
were
analyzed.
Thirty-nine
subjects
(20
males,
19
females)
different
levels
participated
standardized
submaximal
bicycle
ergometer
protocol
using
either
MedMask,
FFP2exhal,
community
mask,
or
no
(control)
four
days,
randomized
order.
PWC130
PWC150
mechanical
load
at
heart
rates
130
150
beats
per
minute
measured
transcutaneous
carbon
dioxide
partial
pressure,
saturation
peripheral
capillary
oxygen,
breathing
frequency,
blood
perceived
respiratory
effort,
exhaustion.
Using
MedMask
did
not
lead
to
changes
response
compared
control.
Neither
appeared
exceeding
normal
ranges
FFP2exhal
worn.
Perceived
effort
up
one
point
higher
(zero-to-ten
Likert
scale)
(
Scientific Reports,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
12(1)
Published: April 6, 2022
Several
concerns
regarding
the
safety
of
face
masks
use
have
been
propounded
in
public
opinion.
The
objective
this
review
is
to
examine
if
these
find
support
literature
by
providing
a
comprehensive
overview
physiological
responses
masks.
We
performed
systematic
review,
pairwise
and
network
meta-analyses
investigate
study
has
registered
with
PROSPERO
(C
RD42020224791).
Obtained
results
were
screened
using
our
exclusion
inclusion
criteria.
Meta-analyses
GeMTC
meta
R
packages.
identified
26
studies
meeting
criteria,
encompassing
751
participants.
was
not
associated
significant
changes
pulsoxymetrically
measured
oxygen
saturation,
even
during
maximal-effort
exercises.
only
low-intensity
activities
slight
increase
heart
rate,
mildly
elevated
partial
pressure
carbon
dioxide
(not
criteria
for
hypercarbia),
increased
temperature
facial
skin
covered
mask,
subsequent
score
rating
heat
perception,
N95
filtering
facepiece
respirators
having
greater
effect
than
surgical
In
high-intensity
conditions,
decreased
uptake,
ventilation,
RR.
Face
are
safe
do
cause
alterations
human
physiology.
rate
stems
most
likely
from
respiratory
work
required
overcome
breathing
resistance.
too
small
be
clinically
relevant.
An
perception
when
higher
mask.
Challenges,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
13(2), P. 67 - 67
Published: Dec. 19, 2022
Background:
The
use
of
face
masks
was
a
significant
part
the
WHO
COVID-19
preventive
protocols.
While
their
usage
has
been
effective,
lack
adherence
by
individuals
associated
with
discomfort
and
adverse
side
effects.
This
might
facilitate
unnecessary
exposure
to
SARS-CoV-2
virus,
thereby
increasing
incidence
COVID-19.
study
assessed
effects
prolonged
mask-wearing
offers
recommendations
for
present
future
pandemics.
Methods:
Adverse
were
evaluated
from
November
2021
February
2022
structured
Google
Forms
online
questionnaire.
survey
targeted
regular
occasional
mask
users
around
world.
All
responders
anonymously
completed
survey,
which
included
ten
questions
sub-section
on
continuous
masks.
information
obtained
analyzed
using
descriptive
statistics,
data
presented
in
graphs.
Results:
Almost
60%
(1243)
2136
participants
indicated
while
Breathing
difficulties
pain
ears
cited
as
major
causes
discomfort,
accounting
32%
22%,
respectively,
responses.
Headaches
reported
26.8%
(572)
respondents,
44.6%
experiencing
one
within
1
h
wearing
mask.
Nine
hundred
eight
(908)
respondents
experienced
nasal
412
various
skin-related
including
excessive
sweating
mouth
acne.
Conclusions:
provides
baseline
why
there
less
includes
headaches,
skin
irritation,
ear
pains,
breathing
difficulties,
sore
throat,
dry
eyes,
increased
mouth.
As
result,
this
may
contribute
an
risk
infection.
lingers
management
its
undesirable
persists
into
future,
it
is
vital
that
superior
design,
concentrating
safety,
comfort,
tolerability,
be
developed.
Frontiers in Oncology,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
15
Published: March 7, 2025
Background
The
COVID-19
pandemic
necessitated
the
widespread
use
of
face
masks
in
medical
settings.
In
treatment
patients
with
head
and
neck
tumors
or
other
malignancies,
where
non-verbal
communication
emotional
expression
are
critical,
may
potentially
impair
physician-patient
relationship.
This
study
aimed
to
assess
impact
on
perceived
empathy
quality
this
patient
cohort.
Methods
A
prospective
case-control
as
part
postoperative
follow-up
consultations
was
conducted
at
Department
Oral
Maxillofacial
Surgery,
University
Medical
Center
Goettingen,
utilizing
Consultation
Relational
Empathy
(CARE)
measure.
Patients
were
divided
into
two
groups:
case
group,
clinicians
wore
throughout
entire
consultation,
while
control
worn
only
during
clinical
examination.
primary
outcome
difference
CARE
scores,
reflecting
clinician.
Results
No
significant
mean
scores
observed
between
groups
(p=0.454),
indicating
that
wearing
a
mask
did
not
significantly
affect
patients’
perception
clinician
empathy.
However,
positive
correlation
found
familiarity
higher
(p=0.003).
Other
variables,
such
health
status
consultation
duration,
influence
scores.
Conclusion
Wearing
does
context
communication.
Familiarity
emerged
key
factor
enhancing
interaction.
These
findings
underscore
importance
fostering
long-term,
trust-based
relationships,
particularly
periods
pandemic-related
protective
measures
mandates.
BMC Public Health,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
25(1)
Published: March 11, 2025
Several
nonpharmaceutical
interventions,
such
as
masking,
were
mandated
or
recommended
during
the
Coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
pandemic.
This
study's
primary
objective
is
to
investigate
relationship
between
population-level
mask
usage
and
excess
mortality
across
Europe.
We
collected
data
on
other
relevant
variables
from
24
European
countries
2020-2021,
a
period
in
which
policies
varied
widely
nations,
providing
an
ideal
basis
for
natural
experiment.
To
assess
association
medical
socioeconomic
at
country
level,
we
conducted
both
bivariate
multivariate
regression
analyses.
Confounding
factors
accounted
models,
numerous
sensitivity
tests
performed
ensure
robustness.
Statistically
significant
correlations
found
rate
age-adjusted
(Spearman
coefficient
=
0.477,
p
0.018)
(Standardized
0.52,
0.0012)
regressions.
Likewise,
vaccination
rates
showed
negative
-0.659,
<
.001)
-0.48,
0.0016)
with
mortality.
No
correlation
was
observed
COVID-19
morbidity.
However,
associations
identified
rates,
mortality,
deaths.
Various
hypotheses
have
been
proposed
explain
these
associations,
thorough
consideration
given
potential
confounders,
severity
of
waves.
Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
58, P. 85 - 90
Published: June 21, 2022
During
the
current
COVID-19
pandemic
and
increased
air
pollution
levels,
wearing
a
facial
mask
has
been
recommended.
This
study
aimed
to
compare
impact
of
different
masks
when
performing
submaximal
functional
activity
(six-minute
walk
test;
6MWT)
on
respiratory
symptoms,
oxygen
saturation,
capacity.
Twenty-nine
subjects
(10
men,
19
women;
age
22
±
1
yr.;
FEV1/FVC
0.90
0.01)
performed
four
rounds
6MWT
(surgical
(Medima
SK,
Thailand),
handmade
cloth,
N95
(3M
AuraTM
1870+,
USA))
while
not
mask.
Respiratory
symptoms
(dyspnea
breathing
effort),
other
physiological
parameters
were
assessed
before
after
each
walking
trial.
Six-minute
distances
comparable
between
trials
(P
=
0.59).
At
end
minute
6,
significant
difference
groups
was
found
dyspnea
0.02)
effort
<
0.001).
Post
hoc
tests
showed
that
cloth
significantly
0.004)
compared
surgical
Wearing
also
0.001)
Likewise,
an
mask,
0.007)
0.002).
results
in
no
differences
performance,
heart
rate,
or
blood
pressure.
However,
higher
symptoms.