Clinically Evident Portal Hypertension Is an Independent Risk Factor of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence Following Liver Transplantation
A. Kornberg,
No information about this author
Nick Seyfried,
No information about this author
Helmut Frieß
No information about this author
et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
14(6), P. 2032 - 2032
Published: March 17, 2025
Background/Objectives:
Clinically
evident
portal
hypertension
(CEPH)
is
a
major
risk
factor
for
the
development
and
poor
outcomes
of
hepatocellular
carcinoma
(HCC).
The
aim
this
study
was
to
determine
impact
CEPH
on
HCC
recurrence
following
liver
transplantation
(LT).
Methods:
A
total
129
patients
were
included
in
retrospective
analysis.
definition
based
indirect
clinical
features
without
hepatic
venous
pressure
gradient
measurement.
post-LT
determined
by
uni-
multivariate
Results:
Evidence
manifest
(PH)
associated
with
higher
18F-fluorodeoxy-glucose
(FDG)
uptake
positron
emission
tomography
(PET;
p
<
0.001)
increased
serum
levels
C-reactive
protein
(p
=
0.008)
interleukin−6
(IL-6;
0.001).
cumulative
at
5
years
significantly
group
(38.1%
vs.
10.6%,
eligibility
neoadjuvant
transarterial
chemoembolization
(TACE)
comparable
between
both
cohorts
(71.4%
74.2%;
0.719).
However,
post-interventional
pathologic
response
rate
lower
case
PH
(15.6%
53.1%;
In
addition
Milan
criteria
(MC),
18F-FDG
avidity
PET
values
IL-6
alfa-fetoprotein,
we
identified
as
another
significant
independent
predictor
0.008).
Conclusions:
correlates
an
unfavorable
tumor
phenotype,
TACE
refractoriness
recurrence.
Therefore,
should
be
implemented
pre-transplant
assessment
decision-making
processes.
Language: Английский
Circulating miR-485-3p as a biomarker for VEGF-associated therapeutic response to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in hepatocellular carcinoma
Kyoko Oura,
No information about this author
Asahiro Morishita,
No information about this author
Rie Yano
No information about this author
et al.
Journal of Gastroenterology,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: April 3, 2025
Language: Английский
Comparative efficacy of tislelizumab plus lenvatinib and tislelizumab alone against advanced hepatocellular carcinoma after lenvatinib failure: a real-world study
Jiajin Yang,
No information about this author
Qiuping Xu,
No information about this author
Sihao Luo
No information about this author
et al.
BMC Cancer,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
25(1)
Published: April 16, 2025
This
study
evaluated
the
effectiveness
and
safety
of
tislelizumab
plus
lenvatinib
(TL
group)
monotherapy
(T
in
patients
with
stage
C
hepatocellular
carcinoma
(HCC)
according
to
Barcelona
Clinic
Liver
Cancer
(BCLC)
staging
system
after
failure,
it
analyzed
factors
influencing
TL
as
a
second-line
treatment.
retrospective
analysis
involved
51
treated
at
single
center
between
January
2019
July
2023.
Survival
outcomes
tumor
responses
were
compared
T
groups.
Prognostic
for
overall
survival
(OS)
progression-free
(PFS)
identified
using
Cox
proportional
hazard
regression
models.
Among
BCLC
advanced
HCC
who
experienced
treatment
median
PFS
was
significantly
longer
group
than
(6.8
months
vs.
4.5
months,
p
=
0.003),
OS
notably
extended
(14.0
10.4
0.012).
Although
disease
control
rate
(64%
53.8%,
0.461)
objective
response
(20%
7.7%,
0.202)
numerically
higher
group,
these
differences
did
not
reach
significance.
Child-Pugh
B
liver
function
independent
prognostic
poor
OS,
whereas
only
an
factor
PFS,
PFS.
Subgroup
demonstrated
benefit
A
12.0
0.013)
but
those
(7.7
6.1
0.225).
In
most
frequent
treatment-related
adverse
events
(AEs)
hand-foot
skin
reaction
(32%),
hypertension
(28%),
diarrhea
hypothyroidism
(20%).
Grade
3
or
AEs
occurred
24%
grade
AEs.
The
incidence
comparable
two
As
treatment,
combination
well
tolerated
associated
improved
versus
alone
HCC,
particularly
function.
Language: Английский