New progress in imaging diagnosis and immunotherapy of breast cancer
Jié He,
No information about this author
Nan Liu,
No information about this author
Li Zhao
No information about this author
et al.
Frontiers in Immunology,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
16
Published: March 17, 2025
Breast
cancer
(BC)
is
a
predominant
malignancy
among
women
globally,
with
its
etiology
remaining
largely
elusive.
Diagnosis
primarily
relies
on
invasive
histopathological
methods,
which
are
often
limited
by
sample
representation
and
processing
time.
Consequently,
non-invasive
imaging
techniques
such
as
mammography,
ultrasound,
Magnetic
Resonance
Imaging
(MRI)
indispensable
for
BC
screening,
diagnosis,
staging,
treatment
monitoring.
Recent
advancements
in
technologies
artificial
intelligence-driven
radiomics
have
enhanced
precision
medicine
enabling
early
detection,
accurate
molecular
subtyping,
personalized
therapeutic
strategies.
Despite
reductions
mortality
through
traditional
treatments,
challenges
like
tumor
heterogeneity
resistance
persist.
Immunotherapies,
particularly
PD-1/PD-L1
inhibitors,
emerged
promising
alternatives.
This
review
explores
recent
developments
diagnostics
immunotherapeutic
approaches,
aiming
to
inform
clinical
practices
optimize
outcomes.
Language: Английский
Efficacy of Tislelizumab in Lung Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Waqas Ul Bassar,
No information about this author
Oboseh J Ogedegbe,
No information about this author
Asfia Qammar
No information about this author
et al.
Cureus,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: March 15, 2025
This
systematic
review
and
meta-analysis
evaluated
the
efficacy
of
tislelizumab,
alone
or
in
combination
with
chemotherapy,
patients
lung
cancer.
A
comprehensive
literature
search
was
conducted
across
PubMed,
Embase,
Web
Science,
CENTRAL
databases
until
February
15,
2025.
Only
randomized
controlled
trials
(RCTs)
comparing
tislelizumab
control
treatments
cancer
were
included.
The
primary
outcomes
assessed
overall
survival
(OS)
progression-free
(PFS).
Four
phase-III
RCTs
involving
1,837
included
analysis.
results
demonstrated
that
significantly
improved
OS
(hazard
ratios
(HR):
0.72,
95%
CI:
0.63-0.81)
PFS
(HR:
0.61,
0.54-0.68)
compared
to
treatments.
Subgroup
analyses
revealed
consistent
benefits
both
non-small-cell
(NSCLC)
small-cell
(SCLC)
populations,
no
significant
differences
between
types.
Similarly,
comparable
whether
administered
as
monotherapy
chemotherapy.
Low
heterogeneity
observed
among
studies,
suggesting
consistency
treatment
effects.
Follow-up
duration
studies
ranged
from
14.2
16.7
months.
These
findings
indicate
either
combined
is
an
effective
option
for
patients,
demonstrating
improvements
outcomes.
However,
further
high-quality
are
needed
validate
these
results,
particularly
SCLC
where
evidence
limited
a
single
study.
Future
research
should
also
consider
patient-specific
factors
such
age,
gender,
comorbidities
refine
strategies.
Language: Английский