Community-Based View on Diagnostic Imaging at the End of COVID-19 Pandemic: Online Survey-Assisted Study
Yana Anfinogenova,
No information about this author
Aleksandra S. Maksimova,
No information about this author
Tatiana A. Shelkovnikova
No information about this author
et al.
Published: April 1, 2024
Background:
Online
survey-based
observational
cross-sectional
study
aimed
at
elucidating
experience
and
attitudes
of
unstructured
population
regarding
diagnostic
imaging.
Methods:
Invitations
to
participate
were
distributed
using
mixed-mode
design
deidentified
residents
aged
18
years
older.
Main
outcome
measures
included
morbidity
structure
incidence
imaging
administrations.
Results:
Respondents
(n
=
1069)
44.3
±
14.4
years;
32.8%
suffered
from
cardiovascular
diseases
(CVD);
9.5%
had
chronic
respiratory
pathology;
28.9%
considered
themselves
healthy.
with
COVID-19
history
(49.7%)
reported
higher
rates
computed
tomography
(CT)
(p
<
.0001),
magnetic
resonance
(MRI)
.001),
ultrasound
.05).
in
CVD
respondents
shifted
administrations
towards
CT
MRI
Every
tenth
respondent
received
MRI,
CT,
on
paid
basis;
29.0%
could
not
pay
for
procedures;
13.1%
unavailable
MRI.
Professional
status
significantly
affected
the
pattern
modalities
availability
differed
between
urban
rural
areas
.0001).
History
technogenic
events
predisposed
responders
overestimate
value
fluorography
Conclusions:
Preparedness
future
pandemics
requires
development
community-based
outreach
programs
focusing
people's
awareness
medical
safety
value.
Language: Английский
Community-Based View on Diagnostic Imaging at the End of COVID-19 Pandemic: Online Survey-Assisted Study
Yana Anfinogenova,
No information about this author
Aleksandra S. Maksimova,
No information about this author
Tatiana A. Shelkovnikova
No information about this author
et al.
Diagnostics,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
14(12), P. 1269 - 1269
Published: June 15, 2024
(1)
Background:
An
online
survey-based
observational
cross-sectional
study
aimed
at
elucidating
the
experience
and
attitudes
of
an
unstructured
population
regarding
diagnostic
imaging.
(2)
Methods:
Invitations
to
participate
were
distributed
using
mixed-mode
design
deidentified
residents
aged
18
years
older.
Main
outcome
measures
included
morbidity
structure
incidence
imaging
administrations.
(3)
Results:
Respondents
(n
=
1069)
44.3
±
14.4
years;
32.8%
suffered
from
cardiovascular
diseases
(CVD);
9.5%
had
chronic
respiratory
pathology;
28.9%
considered
themselves
healthy.
with
COVID-19
history
(49.7%)
reported
higher
rates
computed
tomography
(CT)
(p
<
0.0001),
magnetic
resonance
(MRI)
0.001),
ultrasound
0.05).
in
CVD
respondents
shifted
administrations
towards
CT
MRI
Every
tenth
respondent
received
MRI,
CT,
on
a
paid
basis;
29.0%
could
not
pay
for
procedures;
13.1%
unavailable
MRI.
Professional
status
significantly
affected
pattern
modalities
availability
differed
between
urban
rural
areas
0.0001).
History
technogenic
events
predisposed
responders
overestimate
value
fluorography
(4)
Conclusions:
Preparedness
future
pandemics
requires
development
community-based
outreach
programs
focusing
people’s
awareness
medical
safety
value.
Language: Английский
Clinical Significance and Patterns of Potential Drug–Drug Interactions in Cardiovascular Patients: Focus on Low-Dose Aspirin and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
Journal of Clinical Medicine,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
13(15), P. 4289 - 4289
Published: July 23, 2024
Objective:
This
study
assessed
the
patterns
and
clinical
significance
of
potential
drug–drug
interactions
(pDDIs)
in
patients
with
diseases
cardiovascular
system.
Methods:
Electronic
health
records
(EHRs),
established
2018–2023,
were
selected
using
probability
serial
nested
sampling
method
(n
=
1030).
Patients
aged
27
to
95
years
(65.0%
men).
Primary
diagnosis
COVID-19
was
present
17
EHRs
(1.7%).
Medscape
Drug
Interaction
Checker
used
characterize
pDDIs.
The
Mann–Whitney
U
test
chi-square
for
statistical
analysis.
Results:
numbers
per
record
ranged
from
1
23
T-List
20
P-List.
In
T-List,
567
drug
combinations
resulted
3781
P-List,
584
5185
Polypharmacy
detected
39.0%
versus
65.9%
P-List
(p-value
<
0.05).
rates
serious
monitor-closely
pDDIs
due
‘aspirin
+
captopril’
significantly
higher
than
enalapril’
lisinopril’
lower
compared
corresponding
Serious
administration
aspirin
fosinopril,
perindopril,
ramipril
less
frequently
Conclusions:
Obtained
data
may
suggest
better
patient
adherence
combinations,
which
are
potentially
superior
ramipril.
An
abundance
high-order
real-world
practice
warrants
development
a
decision
support
system
aimed
at
reducing
pharmacotherapy-associated
risks
while
integrating
pharmacokinetic,
pharmacodynamic,
pharmacogenetic
information.
Language: Английский