Predictors of implant failure: A comprehensive analysis of risk factors in oral implant restoration for patients with partial defects of dentition
Dake Linghu,
No information about this author
Danna Zhang,
No information about this author
Min Liu
No information about this author
et al.
Biomolecules and Biomedicine,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Jan. 15, 2025
Implant
failure
remains
a
significant
challenge
in
oral
implantology,
necessitating
deeper
understanding
of
its
risk
factors
to
improve
treatment
outcomes.
This
study
aimed
enhance
the
clinical
outcomes
implant
restoration
by
investigating
contributing
patients
with
partial
dentition
defects
within
two
years
treatment.
Additionally,
sought
develop
an
early
prediction
model
for
failure.
A
retrospective
analysis
was
conducted
on
300
defects,
dividing
them
into
groups:
failed
group
and
successful
group,
based
occurrence
years.
General
data
condition-specific
information
were
compared
between
groups.
Multivariate
binary
logistic
regression
used
identify
influencing
factors,
while
predictive
effectiveness
assessed
using
receiver
operating
characteristic
(ROC)
curve.
The
revealed
that
such
as
gender,
post-implant
smoking,
hygiene
status
at
second-year
follow-up,
tooth
position,
number
implants,
timing
loading,
width
keratinized
mucosa,
bone
quantity
significantly
influenced
likelihood
(P
<
0.05).
Among
these,
smoking
position
identified
independent
factors.
area
under
curve
(AUC)
0.695,
indicating
low
performance.
Although
determined
be
factor
years,
performance
limited.
Language: Английский
Workflow for Maxilla/Mandible Individual [Mai®] Implant by Integra Implants—How Individual Implants Are Manufactured
Biomedicines,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
12(8), P. 1773 - 1773
Published: Aug. 6, 2024
The
newest
technology
allows
the
medical
industry
to
manufacture
innovative
products
such
as
milled
titanium
prosthodontic
parts
in
an
implant
for
a
screw-retained
suprastructure.
In
literature,
there
are
some
articles
on
clinical
usage
of
subperiosteal
implants,
but
none
these
publications,
either
PubMed
or
Google
Scholar,
thoroughly
describe
workflow
design
and
individual
implants
maxillofacial
surgery
with
threads
bridge.
aim
article
is
present
step-by-step
method
producing
personalized
from
first
steps
production
implantation
final
product.
includes
information
patient
qualification
surgery,
computational
preparation
skull
printing,
planning
Mai
Implants
Language: Английский
Peri-Implant Tissue Stability: A Series of Five Case Reports on an Innovative Implant Design
Applied Sciences,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
14(18), P. 8354 - 8354
Published: Sept. 17, 2024
Background/Aim:
The
stability
of
peri-implant
tissues
is
crucial
for
the
long-term
success
dental
implant
treatments.
A
new
cervical
design
has
been
developed
to
address
challenges
associated
with
tissue
stability,
featuring
a
concave
portion
increase
volume
in
this
area.
present
study
aimed
clinically
evaluate
effectiveness
maintaining
stability.
Materials
and
Methods:
Five
clinical
cases
involving
completely
edentulous
patients
were
selected,
which
25
implants
installed.
marginal
bone
level
around
each
was
assessed
at
three
different
time
points—T0:
immediately
after
prosthesis
installation,
T1:
6
months
post
T2:
last
control
visit,
up
38
later.
Measurements
taken
analyze
changes
levels
(MBLs)
keratinized
mucosa
(KM)
over
time.
Furthermore,
evaluated.
Results:
mean
standard
deviation
values
point
as
follows—T0:
0.59
±
0.55
mm;
1.41
1.76
0.69
mm.
Statistical
analysis
showed
significant
differences
across
points
(ANOVA
p
<
0.0001).
overall
KM
3.85
mm
T1
T2,
showing
soft
≥1-year
controls.
Conclusion:
Within
limitations
study,
results
that
Collo
presented
measured
MBL
increasing
within
range
analyzed
case
but
normal
cited
literature
these
types
rehabilitation
However,
presented,
all
cases,
an
average
above
referenced
minimum
health
tissues.
Language: Английский