Effects of Physical Training Programs on Healthy Athletes’ Vertical Jump Height: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis DOI
Shuzhen Ma,

Yanqi Xu,

Simao Xu

et al.

Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 236 - 257

Published: March 24, 2025

Various physical training programs are widely used to enhance vertical jump height, but their relative effectiveness remains debated. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate of four methods -weight resistance, plyometric, complex, routine training- on height. A comprehensive search six databases (PubMed, ERIC, Google Scholar, Web Science, EBSCOhost, Scopus) identified relevant studies coded based type, modality, outcome measures. Methodological quality statistical analysis were assessed using PEDro scale R (version 4.1.3) with the 'meta' package. Eight revealed that plyometric weight resistance exercise increased by 5.2 cm (95% CI: 2.6, 7.7 cm; I2 = 4.7%) 9.9 6.7, 13.5 0.0%), while improved squat 1.5 0.2, 2.6 0.0%) 3.1 16.9%) compared training. Fifteen indicated training, exercise, complex countermovement 2.0 1.4, 3.7 2.2 5.0 2.5, 7.6 Complex was more effective than (2.6 95% 5.5 cm) (2.9 5.8 cm), no significant difference between (0.2 -1.0, cm). Heterogeneity low for most comparisons (I2 0.0% 16.9%), indicating consistent results across different interventions. demonstrates significantly improve vertical, squat, performance. Weight is stationary jumps, jumps.

Language: Английский

Exercise Training and Cardiac Rehabilitation in Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Comprehensive Assessment and Prescription DOI Open Access
Cristina Andreea Adam,

John M. Erskine,

Buket Akıncı

et al.

Journal of Clinical Medicine, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 14(5), P. 1607 - 1607

Published: Feb. 27, 2025

Current guidelines on acute and chronic coronary syndromes recommend comprehensive multidisciplinary exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in Class I. Indeed, patients after a percutaneous intervention, this supervised structured program improves cardiovascular risk reduces adverse events mortality. After an initial assessment, including peak exercise capacity evaluation, follow tailored consisting of aerobic resistance training, factor management, dietary counselling, physical activity weight control psychosocial support, education. However, management prescription require careful assessment consideration several variables such as left ventricular dysfunction, comorbidities, aging, artery disease severity, capacity, type syndrome. The functional prognostic benefits have been widely demonstrated intervention; however, referral is still limited, although should be strongly recommended to these the context prevention. Therefore, aim our article provide updated, critical, state-of-the-art review training programs intervention. Furthermore, practical approaches with personalized intervention will provided.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Effects of Physical Training Programs on Healthy Athletes’ Vertical Jump Height: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis DOI
Shuzhen Ma,

Yanqi Xu,

Simao Xu

et al.

Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 236 - 257

Published: March 24, 2025

Various physical training programs are widely used to enhance vertical jump height, but their relative effectiveness remains debated. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate of four methods -weight resistance, plyometric, complex, routine training- on height. A comprehensive search six databases (PubMed, ERIC, Google Scholar, Web Science, EBSCOhost, Scopus) identified relevant studies coded based type, modality, outcome measures. Methodological quality statistical analysis were assessed using PEDro scale R (version 4.1.3) with the 'meta' package. Eight revealed that plyometric weight resistance exercise increased by 5.2 cm (95% CI: 2.6, 7.7 cm; I2 = 4.7%) 9.9 6.7, 13.5 0.0%), while improved squat 1.5 0.2, 2.6 0.0%) 3.1 16.9%) compared training. Fifteen indicated training, exercise, complex countermovement 2.0 1.4, 3.7 2.2 5.0 2.5, 7.6 Complex was more effective than (2.6 95% 5.5 cm) (2.9 5.8 cm), no significant difference between (0.2 -1.0, cm). Heterogeneity low for most comparisons (I2 0.0% 16.9%), indicating consistent results across different interventions. demonstrates significantly improve vertical, squat, performance. Weight is stationary jumps, jumps.

Language: Английский

Citations

0