Annals of Intensive Care,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
11(1)
Published: June 4, 2021
Abstract
Background
We
investigated
the
impact
of
COVID-19
crisis
on
mental
health
professionals
working
in
intensive
care
unit
(ICU)
according
to
intensity
epidemic
France.
Methods
This
cross-sectional
survey
was
conducted
77
French
hospitals
from
April
22
May
13
2020.
All
ICU
frontline
healthcare
workers
were
eligible.
The
primary
endpoint
health,
assessed
using
12-item
General
Health
Questionnaire.
Sources
stress
during
Perceived
Stressors
Intensive
Care
Units
(PS-ICU)
scale.
Epidemic
defined
as
high
or
low
for
each
region
based
publicly
available
data
Santé
Publique
Effects
linear
mixed
models,
moderation
and
mediation
analyses.
Results
In
total,
2643
participated;
64.36%
high-intensity
zones.
Professionals
areas
with
greater
at
higher
risk
issues
(
p
<
0.001),
levels
overall
perceived
compared
low-intensity
Factors
associated
female
sex
B
=
0.13;
95%
confidence
interval
[CI]
0.08–0.17),
having
a
relative
0.14;
95%-CI
0.09–0.18)
zones
0.11;
0.02–0.20).
mediated
context
0.23,
0.05,
0.41)
moderated
by
positive
thinking,
b
−
0.32,
CI
0.54,
0.11.
Conclusion
negatively
impacted
professionals.
where
significantly
more
affected,
stress.
study
is
supported
grant
Ministry
(PHRC-COVID
2020).
PLoS ONE,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
16(3), P. e0247997 - e0247997
Published: March 11, 2021
During
medical
pandemics,
protective
behaviors
need
to
be
motivated
by
effective
communication,
where
finding
predictors
of
fear
and
perceived
health
is
critical
importance.
The
varying
trajectories
the
COVID-19
pandemic
in
different
countries
afford
opportunity
assess
unique
influence
'macro-level'
environmental
factors
'micro-level'
psychological
variables
on
both
health.
Here,
we
investigate
using
machine
learning
as
lockdown
restrictions
response
were
introduced
Austria,
Spain,
Poland
Czech
Republic.
Over
a
seven-week
period,
533
participants
completed
weekly
self-report
surveys
which
measured
target
subjective
virus
health,
addition
potential
predictive
related
factors,
social
vulnerability
disease
(PVD),
economic
circumstances.
Viral
spread,
mortality
governmental
responses
further
included
analysis
predictors.
Results
revealed
that
our
models
could
accurately
predict
(accounting
for
approximately
23%
variance)
such
worrying
about
shortages
food
supplies
interestingly,
spread
did
not
contribute
this
prediction.
Furthermore,
results
predicted
PVD,
physical
exercise,
attachment
anxiety
age
input
features,
albeit
with
smaller
effect
sizes.
Taken
together,
emphasize
importance
opposed
when
predicting
offer
starting
point
more
extensive
research
influences
pathogen
threat
psychology
Journal of Medical Virology,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
94(1), P. 110 - 118
Published: Aug. 13, 2021
The
COVID-19
pandemic
has
had
a
strong
impact
on
healthcare
workers
(HCWs),
affecting
their
physical
and
mental
health.
In
Italy,
HCWs
have
been
among
the
first
exposed
to
unprecedented
pressure,
dealing
with
large
numbers
of
infections
during
wave.
However,
severe
psychological
consequences
find
little
evidence
in
literature,
especially
terms
comparison
status
quo
ante
pandemic.
aim
this
study
was
provide
an
assessment
health
burden
cohort
Italian
pandemic,
comparing
condition
that
before
emergency,
direct
promotion
well-being
worldwide.
retrospective
study,
we
included
physicians,
therapists,
nurses
working
Respiratory
Intensive
Care
Unit,
Neurology
Rehabilitation
Unit
from
Southern
Italy
University
Hospital.
All
participants
underwent
battery
tests,
aimed
at
verifying
state
emergency
it.
Depressive,
anxiety,
burnout
symptoms
were
assessed
using
following
questionnaires:
Maslach
Burnout
Inventory,
Patient
Health
Questionnaire-9
(PHQ-9),
General
Anxiety
Disorder-7.
clinical
relevance
present
more
than
those
emergency.
Fifty
percent
obtained
score
clinically
significant
Moreover,
depersonalization
factor
showed
statistically
increase
average
scores
(p
<
0.0001).
PHQ-9
scale
47.1%
operators
reported
depressive
presence.
number
scoring
above
cut-off
for
anxiety
tripled
female
gender
conferred
greater
risks
depression.
Taken
together,
findings
our
sample
risk
depression,
stress
These
data
might
be
starting
point
plan
monitoring
prevention
programs
HCWs,
thus
ensuring
patients
receive
best
possible
care
performances
even
crises
such
as
current
Annals of Intensive Care,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
11(1)
Published: June 4, 2021
Abstract
Background
We
investigated
the
impact
of
COVID-19
crisis
on
mental
health
professionals
working
in
intensive
care
unit
(ICU)
according
to
intensity
epidemic
France.
Methods
This
cross-sectional
survey
was
conducted
77
French
hospitals
from
April
22
May
13
2020.
All
ICU
frontline
healthcare
workers
were
eligible.
The
primary
endpoint
health,
assessed
using
12-item
General
Health
Questionnaire.
Sources
stress
during
Perceived
Stressors
Intensive
Care
Units
(PS-ICU)
scale.
Epidemic
defined
as
high
or
low
for
each
region
based
publicly
available
data
Santé
Publique
Effects
linear
mixed
models,
moderation
and
mediation
analyses.
Results
In
total,
2643
participated;
64.36%
high-intensity
zones.
Professionals
areas
with
greater
at
higher
risk
issues
(
p
<
0.001),
levels
overall
perceived
compared
low-intensity
Factors
associated
female
sex
B
=
0.13;
95%
confidence
interval
[CI]
0.08–0.17),
having
a
relative
0.14;
95%-CI
0.09–0.18)
zones
0.11;
0.02–0.20).
mediated
context
0.23,
0.05,
0.41)
moderated
by
positive
thinking,
b
−
0.32,
CI
0.54,
0.11.
Conclusion
negatively
impacted
professionals.
where
significantly
more
affected,
stress.
study
is
supported
grant
Ministry
(PHRC-COVID
2020).