Advancing health equity: evaluating AI translations of kidney donor information for Spanish speakers
Frontiers in Public Health,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
13
Published: Jan. 27, 2025
Background
Health
equity
and
access
to
essential
medical
information
remain
significant
challenges,
especially
for
the
Spanish-speaking
Hispanic
population,
which
faces
barriers
in
accessing
living
kidney
donation
opportunities.
ChatGPT,
an
AI
language
model
with
sophisticated
natural
processing
capabilities,
has
been
identified
as
a
promising
tool
translating
critical
health
into
Spanish.
This
study
aims
assess
ChatGPT’s
translation
efficacy
ensure
provided
is
accurate
culturally
relevant.
Methods
T
his
utilized
ChatGPT
versions
3.5
4.0
translate
27
frequently
asked
questions
(FAQs)
from
English
Spanish,
sourced
Donate
Life
America’s
website.
The
translated
content
was
reviewed
by
native
nephrologists
using
standard
rubric
scale
(1–5).
assessment
focused
on
linguistic
accuracy
cultural
sensitivity,
emphasizing
retention
of
original
message,
appropriate
vocabulary
grammar,
relevance.
Results
mean
scores
were
4.89
±
0.32
GPT-3.5
5.00
0.00
GPT-4.0
(
p
=
0.08).
percentage
excellent-quality
translations
(score
5)
89%
100%
0.24).
sensitivity
both
1.00).
Similarly,
achieved
cases
Conclusion
demonstrates
strong
potential
enhance
improving
patients’
LKD
through
sensitive
translations.
These
findings
highlight
role
mitigating
healthcare
disparities
underscore
need
integrating
AI-driven
tools
systems.
Future
efforts
should
focus
developing
accessible
platforms
establishing
guidelines
maximize
AI’s
impact
equitable
delivery
patient
education.
Language: Английский
Large language models for surgical informed consent: an ethical perspective on simulated empathy
Journal of Medical Ethics,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. jme - 110652
Published: March 12, 2025
Informed
consent
in
surgical
settings
requires
not
only
the
accurate
communication
of
medical
information
but
also
establishment
trust
through
empathic
engagement.
The
use
large
language
models
(LLMs)
offers
a
novel
opportunity
to
enhance
informed
process
by
combining
advanced
retrieval
capabilities
with
simulated
emotional
responsiveness.
However,
ethical
implications
empathy
raise
concerns
about
patient
autonomy,
and
transparency.
This
paper
examines
challenges
consent,
potential
benefits
limitations
digital
tools
such
as
LLMs
empathy.
We
distinguish
between
active
empathy,
which
carries
risk
creating
misleading
illusion
connection
passive
focuses
on
recognising
signalling
distress
cues,
fear
or
uncertainty,
rather
than
attempting
simulate
genuine
argue
that
should
be
limited
latter,
cues
alerting
healthcare
providers
anxiety.
approach
preserves
authenticity
human
while
leveraging
analytical
strengths
assist
surgeons
addressing
concerns.
highlights
how
can
ethically
without
undermining
relational
integrity
essential
patient-centred
care.
By
maintaining
transparency
respecting
irreplaceable
role
serve
valuable
support,
replace,
consent.
Language: Английский
Augmenting research consent: should large language models (LLMs) be used for informed consent to clinical research?
Research Ethics,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Dec. 8, 2024
The
integration
of
artificial
intelligence
(AI),
particularly
large
language
models
(LLMs)
like
OpenAI’s
ChatGPT,
into
clinical
research
could
significantly
enhance
the
informed
consent
process.
This
paper
critically
examines
ethical
implications
employing
LLMs
to
facilitate
in
research.
offer
considerable
benefits,
such
as
improving
participant
understanding
and
engagement,
broadening
participants’
access
relevant
information
for
increasing
efficiency
procedures.
However,
these
theoretical
advantages
are
accompanied
by
risks,
including
potential
misinformation,
coercion
challenges
accountability.
Given
complex
nature
research,
which
involves
both
written
documentation
(in
form
sheets
forms)
in-person
conversations
with
a
researcher,
use
raises
significant
concerns
about
adequacy
existing
regulatory
frameworks.
Institutional
Review
Boards
(IRBs)
will
need
consider
substantial
reforms
accommodate
LLM-based
processes.
We
explore
five
LLM
implementation,
ranging
from
supplementary
roles
complete
replacements
current
processes,
recommendations
researchers
IRBs
navigate
landscape.
Thus,
we
aim
provide
practical
introduction
settings
considering
factors
understanding,
accuracy,
human
oversight
types
applications
consent.
Language: Английский