Geometric Feature Characterization of Apple Trees from 3D LiDAR Point Cloud Data DOI Creative Commons
Md Rejaul Karim, Shahriar Ahmed, Md Nasim Reza

et al.

Journal of Imaging, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 11(1), P. 5 - 5

Published: Dec. 31, 2024

The geometric feature characterization of fruit trees plays a role in effective management orchards. LiDAR (light detection and ranging) technology for object enables the rapid precise evaluation features. This study aimed to quantify height, canopy volume, tree spacing, row spacing an apple orchard using three-dimensional (3D) sensor. A sensor was used collect 3D point cloud data from orchard. Six samples trees, representing variety shapes sizes, were selected collection validation. Commercial software python programming language utilized process collected data. processing steps involved conversion, radius outlier removal, voxel grid downsampling, denoising through filtering erroneous points, segmentation region interest (ROI), clustering density-based spatial (DBSCAN) algorithm, transformation, removal ground points. Accuracy assessed by comparing estimated outputs with corresponding measured values. sensor-estimated heights 3.05 ± 0.34 m 3.13 0.33 m, respectively, mean absolute error (MAE) 0.08 root squared (RMSE) 0.09 linear coefficient determination (r2) 0.98, confidence interval (CI) −0.14 −0.02 high concordance correlation (CCC) 0.96, indicating strong agreement accuracy. volumes 13.76 2.46 m3 14.09 2.10 m3, MAE 0.57 RMSE 0.61 r2 value 0.97, CI −0.92 0.26, demonstrating precision. For distances 3.04 0.17 3.18 0.24 3.35 3.40 0.05 values 0.12 0.92 0.07 0.94 respectively. −0.18 0.01, −0.1, 0.002 Although minor differences observed, estimates efficient, though specific measurements require further refinement. results are based on limited dataset six values, providing initial insights into performance. However, larger would offer more reliable accuracy assessment. small sample size (six trees) limits generalizability findings necessitates caution interpreting results. Future studies should incorporate broader diverse validate refine characterization, enhancing practices

Language: Английский

Techniques for Canopy to Organ Level Plant Feature Extraction via Remote and Proximal Sensing: A Survey and Experiments DOI Creative Commons
Prasad Nethala, Dugan Um,

Neha Vemula

et al.

Remote Sensing, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 16(23), P. 4370 - 4370

Published: Nov. 22, 2024

This paper presents an extensive review of techniques for plant feature extraction and segmentation, addressing the growing need efficient phenotyping, which is increasingly recognized as a critical application remote sensing in agriculture. As understanding quantifying structures become essential advancing precision agriculture crop management, this survey explores range methodologies, both traditional cutting-edge, extracting features from images point cloud data, well segmenting organs. The importance accurate phenotyping underscored, given its role improving monitoring, yield prediction, stress detection. highlights challenges posed by complex morphologies data noise, evaluating performance various emphasizing their strengths limitations. insights offer valuable guidance researchers practitioners fields science experimental section focuses on three key tasks: 3D generation, 2D image-based extraction, shape classification, segmentation. Comparative results are presented using collected several publicly available datasets, along with insightful observations inspiring directions future research.

Language: Английский

Citations

1

Crop Row Detection for Agricultural Autonomous Navigation based on GD-YOLOv10n-seg DOI Creative Commons
Tao Sun,

Cui Longfei,

Le Feixiang

et al.

Research Square (Research Square), Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Dec. 17, 2024

Abstract Accurate crop row detection is an important foundation for agricultural machinery to realize autonomous operation. In this paper, a real-time soybean-corn method based on GD-YOLOv10n-seg with PCA fitting proposed. Firstly, the dataset of was established, and image labeled by line label. Then, improved model constructed integrating GhostModule DynamicConv into YOLOv10n-segmentation model. The experimental results show that performs better in MPA MiOU, size reduced 18.3%. center segmentation fitted PCA, accuracy reaches 95.08%, angle deviation 1.75°, overall processing speed 57.32FPS. This study can provide efficient reliable solution navigation operations such as weeding pesticide application under compound planting mode.

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Geometric Feature Characterization of Apple Trees from 3D LiDAR Point Cloud Data DOI Creative Commons
Md Rejaul Karim, Shahriar Ahmed, Md Nasim Reza

et al.

Journal of Imaging, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 11(1), P. 5 - 5

Published: Dec. 31, 2024

The geometric feature characterization of fruit trees plays a role in effective management orchards. LiDAR (light detection and ranging) technology for object enables the rapid precise evaluation features. This study aimed to quantify height, canopy volume, tree spacing, row spacing an apple orchard using three-dimensional (3D) sensor. A sensor was used collect 3D point cloud data from orchard. Six samples trees, representing variety shapes sizes, were selected collection validation. Commercial software python programming language utilized process collected data. processing steps involved conversion, radius outlier removal, voxel grid downsampling, denoising through filtering erroneous points, segmentation region interest (ROI), clustering density-based spatial (DBSCAN) algorithm, transformation, removal ground points. Accuracy assessed by comparing estimated outputs with corresponding measured values. sensor-estimated heights 3.05 ± 0.34 m 3.13 0.33 m, respectively, mean absolute error (MAE) 0.08 root squared (RMSE) 0.09 linear coefficient determination (r2) 0.98, confidence interval (CI) −0.14 −0.02 high concordance correlation (CCC) 0.96, indicating strong agreement accuracy. volumes 13.76 2.46 m3 14.09 2.10 m3, MAE 0.57 RMSE 0.61 r2 value 0.97, CI −0.92 0.26, demonstrating precision. For distances 3.04 0.17 3.18 0.24 3.35 3.40 0.05 values 0.12 0.92 0.07 0.94 respectively. −0.18 0.01, −0.1, 0.002 Although minor differences observed, estimates efficient, though specific measurements require further refinement. results are based on limited dataset six values, providing initial insights into performance. However, larger would offer more reliable accuracy assessment. small sample size (six trees) limits generalizability findings necessitates caution interpreting results. Future studies should incorporate broader diverse validate refine characterization, enhancing practices

Language: Английский

Citations

0