When Technology Meets Anxiety:The Moderating Role of AI Usage in the Relationship Between Social Anxiety, Learning Adaptability, and Behavioral Problems Among Chinese Primary School Students
GuangYuan Ma,
No information about this author
S S Tian,
No information about this author
Yang Song
No information about this author
et al.
Psychology Research and Behavior Management,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
Volume 18, P. 151 - 167
Published: Jan. 1, 2025
This
study
aims
to
examine
the
relationships
between
social
anxiety,
learning
adaptability,
AI
technology
usage,
and
behavioral
problems
among
primary
school
students,
with
a
focus
on
mediating
role
of
adaptability
moderating
usage.
A
cross-sectional
survey
was
conducted
1240
students
aged
8-15
in
Luzhou,
Sichuan
Province.
Social
anxiety
measured
using
Anxiety
Scale
for
Children
(SASC),
assessed
Children's
Learning
Adaptability
Questionnaire
(CSAQ),
were
evaluated
Child
Behavior
Checklist
(CBCL),
tool
usage
gauged
through
self-developed
questionnaire.
Data
analysis
involved
correlation
multiple
regression
analyses
SPSS,
moderated
mediation
effect
analyzed
Process
Model
59.
found
significantly
positively
predict
problems,
indicating
that
higher
levels
associated
more
problems.
partially
mediated
this
relationship,
suggesting
not
only
directly
impacts
but
also
indirectly
heightens
risk
by
reducing
adaptability.
Additionally,
relationship
stronger
observed
at
Specifically,
positive
influence
became
pronounced
as
increased,
frequent
use
can
amplify
impact
outcomes.
increases
diminishing
plays
its
effects
becoming
highlights
need
educators
improving
students'
judiciously
incorporate
technology,
consider
individual
differences,
particularly
mental
health,
foster
comprehensive
healthy
student
development.
Language: Английский
CONTRADICTORY ATTITUDES TOWARD ACADEMIC AI TOOLS: THE EFFECT OF AWE-PRONENESS AND CORRESPONDING SELF-REGULATION
Jiajin Tong,
No information about this author
Yangmingxi Zhang,
No information about this author
Yutong Li
No information about this author
et al.
Computers in Human Behavior Artificial Humans,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 100123 - 100123
Published: Jan. 1, 2025
Language: Английский
Research on influencing factors and mechanisms of college students’ use of artificial intelligence tools based on sor and rational behavior models
Linlin Bai
No information about this author
Current Psychology,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Jan. 2, 2025
Language: Английский
The Impact of AI on the Future of Education in Indonesia
Mohammad Fauziddin,
No information about this author
Twinda Rizki Adha,
No information about this author
Nurul Arifiyanti
No information about this author
et al.
Educative Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
3(1), P. 1 - 16
Published: Jan. 16, 2025
Artificial
Intelligence
(AI)
has
the
potential
to
revolutionize
education
in
Indonesia
by
improving
its
quality
and
accessibility.
The
current
study
employed
a
Systematics
Literature
Review
(SLR)
method
analyze
impact
of
AI
implementation
education.
findings
revealed
that
can
support
adaptive
learning,
provide
accurate
assessments,
personalize
students'
learning
experiences.
However,
limited
infrastructure,
data
privacy
concerns,
digital
divide
remain
significant
challenges.
Effective
utilization
requires
teacher
training
clear
ethical
policies
protect
student
privacy.
By
integrating
technology,
system
foster
more
innovative
responsive
environment,
equipping
students
face
challenges
era.
also
recommended
collaboration
among
government,
educational
institutions,
private
sectors
is
needed
maximize
Language: Английский
Modeling the influence of AI dependence to research productivity among STEM undergraduate students: case of a state university in the Philippines
John Manuel C. Buniel,
No information about this author
Juancho Intano,
No information about this author
Odinah Cuartero
No information about this author
et al.
Frontiers in Education,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
10
Published: April 16, 2025
STEM
fields—Science,
Technology,
Engineering,
and
Mathematics—play
crucial
roles
in
advancing
knowledge,
driving
innovation,
addressing
challenges
by
means
of
several
mechanisms
including
research.
Consequently,
curricula
higher
education
institutions
prepare
undergraduate
students
taking
these
fields
to
engage
produce
quality
research
outputs
preparation
for
their
future
careers
or
roles.
The
advent
educational
resources
help
perform
research-related
tasks
artificial
intelligence.
Although
AI
use
is
viewed
as
inappropriate
doing
scholarly
works
due
concerns
about
academic
integrity
the
fear
losing
essential
cognitive
skills,
growing
dependence
among
inevitable.
In
this
regard,
present
study
seeks
empirically
investigate
influence
toward
students’
productivity,
mediating
disposition,
self-efficacy.
Through
literature
review,
a
structural
model
was
proposed
validated.
Initially,
instrument
developed
reflective
constructs
where
items
were
also
generated
using
review.
Eventually,
an
online
survey
conducted
recorded
834
valid
responses
from
students.
Results
revealed
that
seven
hypotheses
model,
six
are
supported
except
causal
path
between
productivity.
paths
dispositions,
self-efficacy
well
three
This
indicates
mediation
linking
findings
imply
strategic
integration
may
foster
not
only
skills
development
but
motivation
confidence,
which
together
could
enhance
overall
productivity
fields.
Language: Английский
Cyberpsychology: Validity of the AI Chatbots Usage Scale for University Students
Research Square (Research Square),
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: April 18, 2025
Abstract
This
study
developed
and
validated
the
AI
Chatbots
Usage
Scale
for
assessing
university
students'
engagement
with
artificial
intelligence
chatbots
in
higher
education.
The
research
employed
a
quantitative
methodology
374
male
undergraduate
students
from
Al-Azhar
university.
Through
rigorous
psychometric
analysis,
including
exploratory
confirmatory
factor
analyses,
four-factor
structure
emerged:
Ease
of
Use,
Perceived
Usefulness,
Trust,
Accessibility.
scale
demonstrated
excellent
reliability
(McDonald's
ω
=
.911,
Cronbach's
α
.911)
strong
construct
validity,
supported
by
good
model
fit
indices
(
CMIN/DF
1.622,
CFI
.940,
RMSEA
.041).
Factor
analysis
revealed
that
four
dimensions
collectively
explained
47.360%
total
variance,
loadings
ranging
.519
to
.729.
final
27-item
showed
robust
internal
consistency
across
all
factors,
highest
mean
scores
observed
Use
(
M
29.07,
SD
6.02)
strongest
correlation
between
Trust
Usefulness
(.899).
These
findings
provide
educators
researchers
instrument
measuring
chatbot
usage
academic
settings,
while
offering
insights
improving
implementation
strategies
scale's
properties
support
its
utility
evaluating
enhancing
integration
educational
contexts.
Language: Английский
Foundations of AI in Educational Assessment
Goran Trajkovski,
No information about this author
Heather Hayes
No information about this author
Digital education and learning,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 1 - 58
Published: Jan. 1, 2025
Language: Английский
Reimagining Tradition: A Comparative Study of Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality in Sustainable Architecture Education
Ying Cao,
No information about this author
Xuewen Gao,
No information about this author
Hongqiao Yin
No information about this author
et al.
Sustainability,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
16(24), P. 11135 - 11135
Published: Dec. 19, 2024
Artificial
intelligence
and
virtual
reality
technologies
have
significant
potential
in
traditional
architectural
education.
Historically
used
separately,
their
educational
impacts
are
not
fully
understood.
To
advance
sustainable
architecture
education,
this
study
incorporates
language
illustration
tools
of
artificial
intelligence,
along
with
immersive
painting
simulation
capabilities
reality,
into
the
curriculum
Jiangnan
architecture.
Through
a
randomized
controlled
trial,
60
students
were
divided
AI,
VR,
control
groups.
Based
on
establishment
an
adaptive
course
learning
assessment
system,
empirically
compares
effects
methods,
teaching
methods
across
four
dimensions:
knowledge,
design,
computation,
learning.
Independent
sample
t-tests
one-way
analysis
variance
to
validate
differences
effectiveness
these
technological
applications.
Findings
reveal
that
notably
enhances
design
outcomes,
whereas
shows
pronounced
bolstering
knowledge
acquisition
computational
tasks.
proves
particularly
suited
conceptualization
narrative-based
tasks,
while
aligns
closely
model
creation
post-design
refinement
activities.
These
findings
provide
new
perspectives
for
hybridizing
contributing
outcomes.
Language: Английский